Re: Bug#928227: unblock: golang-golang-x-net-dev/1:0.0+git20181201.351d144+dfsg-3

2019-06-08 Thread Paul Gevers
Hi On Thu, 6 Jun 2019 14:05:44 +0200 Paul Gevers wrote: > On 05-06-2019 21:49, Dr. Tobias Quathamer wrote: > > I think you could start with the binNMUs for the reverse dependencies of > > golang-golang-x-net-dev now, using unstable this time instead of testing. > > I started with abci. > > > Al

Re: Bug#928227: unblock: golang-golang-x-net-dev/1:0.0+git20181201.351d144+dfsg-3

2019-06-08 Thread Dr. Tobias Quathamer
Am 08.06.19 um 20:53 schrieb Paul Gevers: > This is nearly done. At the moment of writing, there are 6 packages in > testing that are not built-using the latest version of > golang-golang-x-net-dev: > mender-client -> FTBFS; I'll file a bug about that shortly Hi Paul, thanks for the update. I su

Re: Revert some Go packages in unstable to align with testing/buster

2019-06-08 Thread Thorsten Alteholz
Hi everybody, On Wed, 5 Jun 2019, Paul Gevers wrote: One other problem is that tools are lacking to schedule binNMUs on the right packages in an efficient manner and in the right order. I just added [1]. It contains one simple shell script to calculate the build order of golang packages, for