Hi Thomas,
Thomas Goirand (2023-06-27):
> Thanks, but I'm not taking it badly. I understand Zhu's point of view, I
> just do not agree.
It's hard to disagree with facts…
> Currently, I haven't seen it just yet, so I can't even have a clear
> point of view on what we're talking about. So yeah, i
On 6/26/23 15:09, Paul R. Tagliamonte wrote:
Y'all should take a break for a day and why don't we come back to this
with constructive ways forward? (Both of you :) )
Thanks, but I'm not taking it badly. I understand Zhu's point of view, I
just do not agree. Currently, I haven't seen it just ye
Packages will be removed from experimental if it contains a newer version
in unstable (a so called "NVIU" removal).
Which is to say if someone uploads to experimental with a fix, and someone
else uploads to unstable without that change but a huger version, the
experimental package will be removed.
Thanks for your comments. Please take a break for a few hours.
Paul
On Mon, Jun 26, 2023, 9:15 AM Shengjing Zhu wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 26, 2023 at 9:12 PM Shengjing Zhu wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 26, 2023 at 9:09 PM Paul R. Tagliamonte
> wrote:
> > >
> > > Packages will be removed from experime
On Mon, Jun 26, 2023 at 9:12 PM Shengjing Zhu wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jun 26, 2023 at 9:09 PM Paul R. Tagliamonte wrote:
> >
> > Packages will be removed from experimental if it contains a newer version
> > in unstable (a so called "NVIU" removal).
> >
>
> The problem with zigo's package is not NVIU.
On Mon, Jun 26, 2023 at 9:09 PM Paul R. Tagliamonte wrote:
>
> Packages will be removed from experimental if it contains a newer version in
> unstable (a so called "NVIU" removal).
>
The problem with zigo's package is not NVIU.
Nobody has uploaded any version newer than zigo's version in experim
On Mon, Jun 26, 2023 at 7:43 PM Thomas Goirand wrote:
>
> On 6/26/23 09:04, Shengjing Zhu wrote:
> > Why don't you work on the experimental suite until the major packages
> > have been ready to migrate?
>
> Because I tried to do that, and nobody cared doing the work to fix their
> packages. Last t
On 6/26/23 09:04, Shengjing Zhu wrote:
Why don't you work on the experimental suite until the major packages
have been ready to migrate?
Because I tried to do that, and nobody cared doing the work to fix their
packages. Last time I uploaded to Experimental, my packages got kicked,
and my work
On Mon, Jun 26, 2023 at 3:04 PM Shengjing Zhu wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jun 26, 2023 at 2:52 PM Thomas Goirand wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > On 6/25/23 11:54, Shengjing Zhu wrote:
> > > Hi zigo,
> > >
> > > You golang-google-grpc 1.38.0 to unstable, which was experimental
> > > previously.
> > > It's grea
On Mon, Jun 26, 2023 at 2:52 PM Thomas Goirand wrote:
> > Could you keep exploring this transition in experimental?
>
> No. I would like to see etcd in unstable ASAP, and it's not my intention
> to delay my uploads further. If we have problems to fix in other
> packages that aren't being addressed
On Mon, Jun 26, 2023 at 2:52 PM Thomas Goirand wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On 6/25/23 11:54, Shengjing Zhu wrote:
> > Hi zigo,
> >
> > You golang-google-grpc 1.38.0 to unstable, which was experimental
> > previously.
> > It's great to see you want to work on this transition. But I fail to
> > see the foll
Hi,
On 6/25/23 11:54, Shengjing Zhu wrote:
Hi zigo,
You golang-google-grpc 1.38.0 to unstable, which was experimental previously.
It's great to see you want to work on this transition. But I fail to
see the following work to make golang-google-grpc migrate to testing.
The page:
https://qa.deb
12 matches
Mail list logo
