Go teams stance on tag2upload

2025-06-19 Thread Martin Dosch
Dear all, how's the go teams stance on tag2upload? As go packages are team maintained it would be nice if we have a consensus on this although there are many packages which are effectively maintained by one person. Best regards, Martin Ursprüngliche Nachricht Von: Ian Jack

Re: RFS: CVE-2023-29401 fix for golang-github-gin-gonic-gin

2025-04-22 Thread Martin Dosch
Dear Mathias, Am 22.04.2025 18:41, schrieb Mathias Gibbens: Thanks for taking a look. Would it be possible to also fix #1035498/CVE-2023-26125 as well? thanks for pointing that out. Fix applied. :) I was going to take a look later today, and if no one beats me to it I'd be happy to upload

RFS: CVE-2023-29401 fix for golang-github-gin-gonic-gin

2025-04-22 Thread Martin Dosch
Dear all, I would appreciate if someone could review the fix for CVE-2023-29401 in golang-github-gin-gonic-gin and upload it to unstable if everything looks good: https://salsa.debian.org/go-team/packages/golang-github-gin-gonic-gin Ratt is currently running, but even if it breaks something:

Re: Not enough space to build gitaly

2025-04-12 Thread Martin Dosch
Dear Otto, mail in that thread).Am 12.04.2025 12:22, schrieb Otto Kekäläinen: I: Unpacked source needs 1612020 KiB (according to du -k) and you have 2034956 KiB free (according to df -k). If you run these commands manually in the build directory inside the build container, what do they print?

Re: Not enough space to build gitaly

2025-04-12 Thread Martin Dosch
Dear all, josch helped me in #debian-mentors. I have to set `$unshare_tmpdir_template` as per default it uses `/tmp` which is a tmpdir. Best regards, Martin signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Not enough space to build gitaly

2025-04-11 Thread Martin Dosch
Dear all, I prepared the update of golang-github-protonmail-go-crypto and ran ratt. It build everything successfully except gitaly. I don't know what's wrong with my build set up as I should have enough of space: ``` E: Disk space is probably not sufficient for building. I: Unpacked source

Re: RFS: sptlrx v1.2.3

2025-04-10 Thread Martin Dosch
Dear all, or maybe someone adds me as maintainer for sptlrx. Actually I wanted to upload sptlrx and lyricsapi together but got caught by surprise that I had no upload rights for sptlrx. 😁 Best regards, Martin

Re: RFS: sptlrx v1.2.3

2025-04-09 Thread Martin Dosch
Dear Shengjing, Am 09.04.2025 20:54, schrieb Shengjing Zhu: $ dcut dm --uid "Martin Dosch" --allow sptlrx Uploading commands file to ssh.upload.debian.org (incoming: /srv/upload.debian.org/UploadQueue/) Picking DM Martin Dosch with fingerprint FD5A92F4208137A4B6680B3D52A57CFCE13D65

RFS: sptlrx v1.2.3

2025-04-07 Thread Martin Dosch
Dear all, I'd like to ask whether someone would sponsor the upload of sptlrx v1.2.3 [1]? It requires the latest lyricsapi [2] (0.0~git20250321.2e8c45d-1) which I just uploaded. Best regards, Martin [1]: https://salsa.debian.org/go-team/packages/sptlrx [2]: https://salsa.debian.org/go-team/p

Re: Bug#1101076: ITP: rsync -- rsync in Go! implements client and server, which can send or receive files (upload, download, all directions supported)

2025-03-25 Thread Martin Dosch
Dear Samuel, Am 22.03.2025 21:50, schrieb Samuel Henrique: Given the current status of the maintenance on rsync upstream, it's going to be handy to have an alternative packaged in the repository just in case. is there some issue with rsync maintanence? I was not aware of issues, also it seems

Re: Crowdsec

2025-03-18 Thread Martin Dosch
Dear Mathias, thanks for your input. I realize that fixing this package is beyond what I can contribute right now. I was hoping it's easier to add that file that fixes it. :( Best regards, Martin signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Crowdsec

2025-03-12 Thread Martin Dosch
Dear all, I'd like to see crowdsec in trixie, as I am using it myself. Is there any chance to get [1081196] fixed by delivering upstreams sshd-logs.yaml? This file is not in the repo and I failed to figure out how it is created. Best regards, Martin [1081196]: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin

Re: Failing tests for golang-github-sylabs-sif

2025-02-15 Thread Martin Dosch
Dear Nilesh, Am 15.02.2025 23:34, schrieb Nilesh Patra: The autopkgtests fail with several "No space left on device" errors, despite there is still a lot of free space, so this seems to be a false postive or something broke my test set up (gbp build-package using sbuild). Can someone checkout t

Failing tests for golang-github-sylabs-sif

2025-02-15 Thread Martin Dosch
Dear all, I prepared an update for golang-github-sylabs-sif and all looks good except the autopkgtests. The package builds fine and ratt also builds all depending packages (except singularity-container) successfully. As singularity-container is a package that has not entered testing for a long

Re: RFS: Privatebin and build dpendency golang-go.gearno-encoding-base58

2024-12-17 Thread Martin Dosch
Dear Simon, Am 17.12.2024 18:00, schrieb Simon Josefsson: Thanks for ping - Uploaded! I got side-tracked by the namespace issue. thank you very much! Best regards, Martin signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: RFS: Privatebin and build dpendency golang-go.gearno-encoding-base58

2024-12-17 Thread Martin Dosch
Dear Simon, are you still willing to sponsor these packages? Is there something I have to prepare for you to be able to upload them (e.g. regarding renaming)? Somehow I am a bit lost right now. :) Best regards, Martin signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: RFS: Privatebin and build dpendency golang-go.gearno-encoding-base58

2024-12-13 Thread Martin Dosch
Dear all, i have no strong feelings according the canonical name of the library package, so either will do. Best regards, Martin Am 12. Dezember 2024 21:36:08 UTC schrieb Shengjing Zhu : >On Fri, Dec 13, 2024 at 4:12 AM Simon Josefsson wrote: >> >> Shengjing Zhu writes: >> >> > https://github

Re: RFS: Privatebin and build dpendency golang-go.gearno-encoding-base58

2024-12-11 Thread Martin Dosch
Dear Simon, Am 11.12.2024 20:59, schrieb Simon Josefsson: The naming of golang-go.gearno-encoding-base58 is a bit weird, how about golang-github-gearnode-base58 and golang-github-gearnode-base58-dev instead? What is the Go team policy on this? as this name was created by dh-make-golang I ass

Re: RFS: Privatebin and build dpendency golang-go.gearno-encoding-base58

2024-12-11 Thread Martin Dosch
Dear Simon, thank you very much. Am 11.12.2024 20:52, schrieb Simon Josefsson: I renamed it now, and will review them next - did you try to rebuild all reverse dependencies and see if things worked? Privatebin-cli as well as golang-go.gearno-encoding-base58 are new packages, so there are no

Re: RFS: Privatebin and build dpendency golang-go.gearno-encoding-base58

2024-12-11 Thread Martin Dosch
Dear all, I am still looking for someone changing the repo name from privatebin to privatebin-cli and to sponsor privatebin-cli [1] and it's dependency golang-go.gearno-encoding-base58 [2]. Sorry for bringing it up again, but as I think the freeze will come soon and I'd like to have it in Tr

RFS: Privatebin and build dpendency golang-go.gearno-encoding-base58

2024-11-16 Thread Martin Dosch
Dear all, I'd like to package privatebin [1][2] and it's build dependency golang-go.gearno-encoding-base58 [3][4]. I'd appreciate if someone would review those packages and uploads them if all looks good. Best regards, Martin [1] https://mentors.debian.net/package/privatebin/ [2] https://s

Re: RFS: Privatebin and build dpendency golang-go.gearno-encoding-base58

2024-11-16 Thread Martin Dosch
Dear all, as suggested in [1087620] I renamed the package from privatebin to privatebin-cli. It would be awesome if someone who as the needed permissions could also rename the repository on salsa from privatebin to privatebin-cli. Best regards, Martin [1087620] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-

Bug#1087620: ITP: privatebin -- A powerful CLI for creating and managing PrivateBin pastes with ease

2024-11-16 Thread Martin Dosch
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Martin Dosch * Package name: privatebin Version : 2.0.2-1 Upstream Author : Bryan Frimin * URL : https://github.com/gearnode/privatebin * License : ISC Programming Lang: Go Description : A powerful CLI for

Bug#1087617: ITP: golang-go.gearno-encoding-base58 --

2024-11-16 Thread Martin Dosch
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Martin Dosch * Package name: golang-go.gearno-encoding-base58 Version : 0.1.0-1 Upstream Author : Bryan Frimin * URL : https://github.com/gearnode/base58 * License : ISC Programming Lang: Go Description : Base58

Re: Regression test against version that is known to break

2024-11-15 Thread Martin Dosch
Dear Taavi, Am 15.11.2024 13:54, schrieb Taavi Väänänen: The break applies to versions less or equal 2.7.5~ and the package is tested against version 2.7.5-1 which is higher than that. thank you very much. I wasn't aware of that, I will fix it. Best regards, Martin signature.asc Description

Regression test against version that is known to break

2024-11-15 Thread Martin Dosch
Dear all, does anyone understand why the build system tests gopenpgp v2.7.5 [1] when this line [2] is present? Best regards, Martin [1] https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/golang-github-protonmail-go-crypto [2] https://salsa.debian.org/go-team/packages/golang-github-protonmail-go-crypto/-/blob/deb

Re: Bug#1087183: RFS: golang-github-protonmail-gopenpgp-v3/3.0.0-1 [ITP] -- high-level OpenPGP library built on top of golang crypto library

2024-11-12 Thread Martin Dosch
Dear Simon, thank you very mucht. Am 12.11.2024 08:23, schrieb Simon Josefsson: Can you file upstream bugs for all projects in Debian that still uses v2, asking them to move to v3? It is nice to have some official wishlist report to refer to. Sometimes good discussions happen, or new informat

Bug#1087183: RFS: golang-github-protonmail-gopenpgp-v3/3.0.0-1 [ITP] -- high-level OpenPGP library built on top of golang crypto library

2024-11-09 Thread Martin Dosch
dium . * Initial release (Closes: #1087133) Best regards, Martin Dosch signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#1087133: ITP: golang-github-protonmail-gopenpgp-v3 -- A high-level OpenPGP library

2024-11-08 Thread Martin Dosch
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Martin Dosch * Package name: golang-github-protonmail-gopenpgp-v3 Version : 3.0.0-1 Upstream Author : ProtonMail * URL : https://github.com/ProtonMail/gopenpgp * License : Expat Programming Lang: Go Description

Question regarding two teams maintaining packages together

2024-10-26 Thread Martin Dosch
Dear all, I am currently taking care of several xmpp related packages that are maintained under the umbrella of the go-team. Those are: - go-sendxmpp [1] - xmpp-dns [2] - xmppsrv [3] - go-xmpp [4] No I wonder whether it would be a good idea to also add xmpp-team as maintainer, so that the

Re: RFS: sptlrx and it's dependencies

2024-10-26 Thread Martin Dosch
Dear Nilesh, Am 26.10.2024 18:55, schrieb Nilesh Patra: Uploaded with minor changes - thanks! thank you very much! The easiest way to test sptlrx is using a player which supports MPRIS (e.g. cmus) and creating a config `~/.config/sptlrx/config.yaml` with the following content: I used my sp

RFS: sptlrx and it's dependencies

2024-10-26 Thread Martin Dosch
Dear all, I am looking for a sponsor for three packages: sptlrx [1] and it's build-dependencies golang-github-raitonoberu-lyricsapi [2] and golang-github-pauloo27-go-mpris [3]. I would appreciate if someone could review those packages and sponsor them if they look good. The easiest way to

Re: Problems with initial packaging of sptlrx

2024-10-25 Thread Martin Dosch
Dear Nilesh, Am 25.10.2024 02:14, schrieb Nilesh Patra: PS: Please consider to specify in future mails that this has an un-uploaded deps. I tried to clone https://salsa.debian.org/go-team/packages/golang-github-raitonoberu-lyricsapi and it has debian/sid itself missing and I had to prepare som

Re: Problems with initial packaging of sptlrx

2024-10-25 Thread Martin Dosch
Dear Nilesh, Am 26.10.2024 00:06, schrieb Nilesh Patra: I submitted this patch upstream and it got merged. https://github.com/raitonoberu/sptlrx/pull/59 Seems you fixed the import path as well in https://github.com/raitonoberu/sptlrx/pull/61 and things are now good to go. thank you very mu

Re: Problems with initial packaging of sptlrx

2024-10-25 Thread Martin Dosch
Dear Shengjing, Am 25.10.2024 04:52, schrieb Shengjing Zhu: That's because the go.mod file[1] says its name is "sptlrx", not "github.com/raitonoberu/sptlrx", which is set in XS-Go-Import-Path in d/control. It is bad practice for upstream to use that name. It may work if you change XS-Go-Import-

Re: Problems with initial packaging of sptlrx

2024-10-25 Thread Martin Dosch
Dear Nilesh, Am 25.10.2024 02:49, schrieb Nilesh Patra: Instead of reverting [4] the below patch at the end of the mail works as well. (But please test it works :)) thank you, I will check this out. Best regards, Martin signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: Problems with initial packaging of sptlrx

2024-10-25 Thread Martin Dosch
Dear Nilesh, Am 25.10.2024 02:14, schrieb Nilesh Patra: I think the error here is with the import path? The import paths used in the package are not canonicalized github paths, and the import path that you -or rather- dh-make-golang specified in XS-Go-Import-path is canonicalized github.com p

Re: Problems with initial packaging of sptlrx

2024-10-24 Thread Martin Dosch
Dear all, seems I am one step further with adding the following in d/rules: ``` override_dh_auto_build: cd _build && go install -trimpath -v -p 7 github.com/raitonoberu/sptlrx ``` Now I have only one weird build failure: ``` cd _build && go install -trimpath -v -p 7 github.com/raitonob

Problems with initial packaging of sptlrx

2024-10-24 Thread Martin Dosch
Dear all, I am trying to package sptlrx [1] and it's dependencies lyricsapi [2] and go-mpris [3]. When building sptlrx it fails like this: ``` dh binary --builddirectory=_build --buildsystem=golang --with=golang dh_update_autotools_config -O--builddirectory=_build -O--buildsystem=golang

Bug#1086009: ITP: golang-github-raitonoberu-lyricsapi -- Go package and server app for retrieving time-stamped lyrics from Spotify.

2024-10-24 Thread Martin Dosch
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Martin Dosch * Package name: golang-github-raitonoberu-lyricsapi Version : 0.0~git20240719.d597358-1 Upstream Author : Denis * URL : https://github.com/raitonoberu/lyricsapi * License : Unlicense Programming Lang: Go

Bug#1086008: ITP: golang-github-pauloo27-go-mpris -- Go library for MPRIS

2024-10-24 Thread Martin Dosch
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Martin Dosch * Package name: golang-github-pauloo27-go-mpris Version : 1.4.0-1 Upstream Author : Paulo * URL : https://github.com/Pauloo27/go-mpris * License : Expat Programming Lang: Go Description : Go library

Re: RFS: filippo.io-edwards25519

2024-05-30 Thread Martin Dosch
Dear Simon, On 30.05.2024 21:42, Simon Josefsson wrote: Thanks for looking into this. The word_by_word_montgomery tool doesn't have to be packaged, instead it could be included in debian/local in this package and used during the build. Is this tool available from upstream, and are there instru

Re: RFS: filippo.io-edwards25519

2024-05-30 Thread Martin Dosch
Dear Simon, sorry for the late reply. On 11.05.2024 18:48, Simon Josefsson wrote: So I believe debian/copyright should mention that file, since that's where the copyright claim is made. I understood that the claim is in scalar.go but is about scalar_fiat.go Now that you mentioned scalar_fia

Re: RFS: filippo.io-edwards25519

2024-05-11 Thread Martin Dosch
Dear Nilesh, Using pristine-tar is against go team packaging workflow. Please don't. https://go-team.pages.debian.net/workflow-changes.html#wf-2017-11-pristine-tar thanks for the info. I tried to delete the branch but seems I have insufficient privileges: LC_ALL=C git push origin

Re: RFS: filippo.io-edwards25519

2024-05-11 Thread Martin Dosch
Dear Simon, Running 'lrc' catches a licensing problem: BSD-3-clause| BSD-1-Clause scalar.go It seems correct. Can you add the license block further down in scalar.go to debian/copyright? I'm thinking of this: Funny that this is in scalar.go while the affected code is in scalar_fia

Re: RFS: filippo.io-edwards25519

2024-05-11 Thread Martin Dosch
Dear Simon, On 10.05.2024 19:20, Simon Josefsson wrote: I reviewed the debian/sid changes and they look fine. Could you push the upstream & pristine-tar branches and the upstream/1.1.0 tag? I wasn't able to build it. thank you for reviewing. I pushed upstream/1.1.0 now. Maybe it was one of

RFS: filippo.io-edwards25519

2024-05-10 Thread Martin Dosch
Dear all, I prepared the packaging for a new release of filippo.io-edwards25519: https://salsa.debian.org/go-team/packages/filippo.io-edwards25519 I successfully ran ratt and would appreciate if someone would upload it to unstable. Best regards, Martin signature.asc Description: PGP signat

Re: RFS: Go-sendxmpp and dependency golang-github-mattn-go-xmpp rebuild for bookworm-backports

2024-01-24 Thread Martin Dosch
Dear all, after building the backport I accidentally signed and uploaded it as I am so used to it and it got accepted. So, it seems that my second request to rt.debian.org was already processed and either I missed the email or didn't receive it. :) Anyway, the package was uploaded and accepte

Re: RFS: Go-sendxmpp and dependency golang-github-mattn-go-xmpp rebuild for bookworm-backports

2024-01-20 Thread Martin Dosch
Dear Nilesh, thank you very much. :) Best regards, Martin signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: RFS: Go-sendxmpp and dependency golang-github-mattn-go-xmpp rebuild for bookworm-backports

2024-01-19 Thread Martin Dosch
I just received an bug report for an issue existing in go-sendxmpp since v0.5.2 and I plan to release v0.8.2 including the fix this weekend, so please don't upload go-sendxmpp v0.8.1 yet as there will be an update. The golang-github-mattn-go-xmpp library is not affected so it could be uploaded

RFS: Go-sendxmpp and dependency golang-github-mattn-go-xmpp rebuild for bookworm-backports

2024-01-18 Thread Martin Dosch
Dear all, unfortunately my RT request for upload permissions to bookworm-backports for these two packages is not yet processed, therefore I kindly ask a sponsor to upload go-sendxmpp [1] and the required update of its dependency golang-github-mattn-go-xmpp [2] to bookworm-backports. Best regar

Re: RFS: golang-github-emersion-go-pgpmail

2024-01-04 Thread Martin Dosch
Dear Nilesh, thank you very much. Best regards, Martin

RFS: golang-github-emersion-go-pgpmail

2024-01-04 Thread Martin Dosch
Dear all, I'd like to ask if someone is willing to review the packaging of the new upstream version and upload it if no changes are necessary: https://salsa.debian.org/go-team/packages/golang-github-emersion-go-pgpmail I successfully ran ratt. Best regards, Martin signature.asc Description:

Re: RFS: go-sendxmpp backport for bookworm

2023-11-18 Thread Martin Dosch
Dear Nilesh, On 17.11.2023 14:24, Nilesh Patra wrote: On Tue, Nov 14, 2023 at 07:18:36PM +0100, Martin Dosch wrote: I have prepared bookworm backports for go-sendxmpp [1] and two build-dependencies which need to updated for building the new go-sendxmpp version: golang-github-mattn-go-xmpp [2

Re: RFS: go-sendxmpp backport for bookworm

2023-11-18 Thread Martin Dosch
Dear Nilesh, On 17.11.2023 14:24, Nilesh Patra wrote: Done. Thank you very much. I would appreciate if someone would check that all is alright and upload the backports if all looks good. Once the packages are uploaded I'll request upload rights on backports RT. Unless I am mistaken, a DD w

RFS: go-sendxmpp backport for bookworm

2023-11-14 Thread Martin Dosch
Dear all, I have prepared bookworm backports for go-sendxmpp [1] and two build-dependencies which need to updated for building the new go-sendxmpp version: golang-github-mattn-go-xmpp [2] and golang-github-beevik-etree [3]. I would appreciate if someone would check that all is alright and up

Re: RFS: xmpp-dns and golang-debian-mdosch-xmppsrv for bookworm-backports

2023-10-04 Thread Martin Dosch
Dear Nilesh, On 01.10.2023 15:59, Nilesh Patra wrote: It can take time though. I think it took 4-6 months for me. ok, then I'll be a bit more patient if it is not uncommon to take months. :) Best regards, Martin signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: RFS: xmpp-dns and golang-debian-mdosch-xmppsrv for bookworm-backports

2023-10-01 Thread Martin Dosch
Dear all, I never got feedback from the backports rt. Is this expected? Where can I check whether it was processed? Best regards, Martin

Re: RFS: xmpp-dns and golang-debian-mdosch-xmppsrv for bookworm-backports

2023-08-26 Thread Martin Dosch
Dear Nilesh, On 26.08.2023 13:13, Nilesh Patra wrote: I've uploaded to bookworm backports. Hopefully my ACL should work fine. Thank you very much. If someone is willing to sponsor those uploads please tell me whether I need to apply for the ACL in RT as described in [3]. You do. Please ap

RFS: xmpp-dns and golang-debian-mdosch-xmppsrv for bookworm-backports

2023-08-25 Thread Martin Dosch
Dear all, I would appreciate if someone could have a look at the prepared backport for xmpp-dns [1] and the required update of its dependency golang-debian-mdosch-xmppsrv [2]. If someone is willing to sponsor those uploads please tell me whether I need to apply for the ACL in RT as described

Re: Packaging of proton-bridge

2023-08-07 Thread Martin Dosch
Hi Julian, I just skimmed through the mail and for the build failure of gherking it looks like it's missing github.com/cucumber/messages. If you used `gbp buildpackage` it probably fails because it is not yet in the sid repos. If you built it locally you might have forgotten to install the dep

Re: RFS: golang-github-sylabs-sif

2023-06-30 Thread Martin Dosch
Dear Nilesh, On 01.07.2023 09:21, Nilesh Patra wrote: On Sat, Jul 01, 2023 at 01:16:58AM +0300, Martin Dosch wrote: Nice. Please help yourself. Nilesh thank you very much. :) Best regards, Martin signature.asc Description: PGP signature

RFS: golang-github-sylabs-sif

2023-06-30 Thread Martin Dosch
Dear all, I added to patches to make golang-github-sylabs-sif build against newer go-crypto versions again (fixes #1037408). I successfully built it with go-crypto 0.0~git20230619.3fbb1f1-1 in experimental and ran ratt with current unstable. golang-github-containers-buildah failed when runni

Re: RFS: golang-github-gabriel-vasile-mimetype 1.4.2

2023-06-20 Thread Martin Dosch
Dear Nilesh, thank you very much. Best regards, Martin

RFS: golang-github-gabriel-vasile-mimetype 1.4.2

2023-06-20 Thread Martin Dosch
Dear all, I prepared an update for golang-github-gabriel-vasile-mimetype to version 1.4.2 and would appreciate it if someone checks it and uploads it to unstable if everything looks good: https://salsa.debian.org/go-team/packages/golang-github-gabriel-vasile-mimetype I successfully ran ratt.

Re: RFS: golang-github-beevik-etree 1.2.0

2023-06-12 Thread Martin Dosch
Dear Nilesh, On 13.06.2023 00:46, Nilesh Patra wrote: Long time! :) Hehe :) Please help yourself: Thank you very much. Best regards, Martin signature.asc Description: PGP signature

RFS: golang-github-beevik-etree 1.2.0

2023-06-12 Thread Martin Dosch
Dear all, I updated golang-github-beevik-etree to 1.2.0 and pushed the changes to salsa [1]. I would appreciate if someone could check it and upload it to unstable if all looks good. I successfully tested it with ratt. Best regards, Martin [1] https://salsa.debian.org/go-team/packages/golang

Re: RFS: golang-github-protonmail-go-crypto 0.0~git20230109.7efeeb0-1

2023-01-12 Thread Martin Dosch
Dear Nilesh, thank you very much. I even had a look but came to the conclusion I have no upload permission on this one. Don't know what I mixed up. 😂 Best regards, Martin Am 11. Januar 2023 20:02:32 UTC schrieb Nilesh Patra : >On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 06:08:44AM +0100, Martin Dos

RFS: golang-github-protonmail-go-crypto 0.0~git20230109.7efeeb0-1

2023-01-10 Thread Martin Dosch
Dear all, I prepared 0.0~git20230109.7efeeb0-1 of golang-github-protonmail-go-crypto and would appreciate if someone could upload the package. I successfully ran ratt and didn't see any issue. Best regards, Martin ratt.tar.gz Description: application/gzip signature.asc Description: PGP s

Re: RFS: golang-github-cloudflare-circl 1.3.1

2022-12-22 Thread Martin Dosch
Dear Nilesh On 21.12.2022 23:03, Nilesh Patra wrote: Please help yourself with an upload. Thank you very much, I will do so. Best regards, Martin signature.asc Description: PGP signature

RFS: golang-github-cloudflare-circl 1.3.1

2022-12-19 Thread Martin Dosch
Dear all, I prepared an update for golang-github-cloudflare-circl [0] and would appreciate if someone has a look at it and uploads it. I successfully ran ratt. Best regards, Martin [0] https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/golang-github-cloudflare-circl signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: RFS: golang-github-cloudflare-circl version 1.3.0

2022-11-12 Thread Martin Dosch
Dear Nilesh, thank you very much. Best regards, Martin

RFS: golang-github-cloudflare-circl version 1.3.0

2022-11-11 Thread Martin Dosch
Dear all, I packaged a new version of golang-github-cloudflare-circl and would appreciate if someone would review it and upload it if all looks good. I ran ratt and didn't see any breakage. https://salsa.debian.org/go-team/packages/golang-github-cloudflare-circl Best regards, Martin signat

Re: RFS: golang-github-caarlos0-sshmarshal

2022-11-01 Thread Martin Dosch
Dear Nilesh, On 02.11.2022 01:08, Nilesh Patra wrote: If this is SUPER-urgent/important, embed that package into the target package with a vendor/ directory. You will need to use a multi-orig tarball for this, here is how to do so[1] and I wrote a smaller version it sometime back here[2], and

Re: RFS: golang-github-caarlos0-sshmarshal

2022-11-01 Thread Martin Dosch
Dear Nilesh, When I said integrate the patch, I meant it needs to be integrated "upstream" In general, changes that can be applied upstream, should be applied upstream. Sorry, seems I got this wrong. Meanwhile you could consider to embed this package if you are in some hurry, but given that

Re: RFS: golang-github-caarlos0-sshmarshal

2022-11-01 Thread Martin Dosch
Dear Shengjing, On 02.11.2022 03:12, Shengjing Zhu wrote: Let's not carry a local patch in golang-go.crypto. Please work with upstream to include that. There is already someone working to bring it upstream: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/crypto/+/218620 As you can see the latest changes

Re: RFS: golang-github-caarlos0-sshmarshal

2022-11-01 Thread Martin Dosch
Dear Nilesh, On 31.10.2022 19:57, Nilesh Patra wrote: Since this has just one patch applied, it'd be better to try to integrate that patch into x-crypto. I applied the patch to golang-go.crypto but I am reluctant to push it as it fails to build and therefore I can't run ratt. But this might

Re: RFS: golang-github-muesli-cancelreader and golang-github-mattn-go-localereader

2022-11-01 Thread Martin Dosch
Dear all, I managed to get this patched into bubbletea [0] and once cancelreader [1] hits sid bubbletea could be uploaded if the patching is alright. [0] https://salsa.debian.org/go-team/packages/golang-github-charmbracelet-bubbletea [1] https://salsa.debian.org/go-team/packages/golang-githu

Re: RFS: golang-github-muesli-cancelreader and golang-github-mattn-go-localereader

2022-11-01 Thread Martin Dosch
Dear Nilesh, thank you for your feedback. On 31.10.2022 19:42, Nilesh Patra wrote: Is it worth inclduign in debian? Or could target package simply be patched for the functionalities? I wanted to include it, as it is a build dependency of newer golang-github-charmbracelet-bubbletea versions.

RFS: golang-github-caarlos0-sshmarshal

2022-10-31 Thread Martin Dosch
Dear all, I would appreciate if someone reviews golang-github-caarlos0-sshmarshal [0] and sponsors the upload to the NEW queue if all is ok. It is a build-dependency for newer versions of golang-github-charmbracelet-wish. Best regards, Martin [0] https://salsa.debian.org/go-team/packages/

Bug#1023102: ITP: golang-github-caarlos0-sshmarshal -- easily marshal SSH private keys

2022-10-30 Thread Martin Dosch
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Martin Dosch * Package name: golang-github-caarlos0-sshmarshal Version : 0.1.0-1 Upstream Author : The Go Authors * URL : https://github.com/caarlos0/sshmarshal * License : BSD-3-Clause Programming Lang: Go

RFS: golang-github-muesli-cancelreader and golang-github-mattn-go-localereader

2022-10-30 Thread Martin Dosch
Dear all, I want to update golang-github-charmbracelet-bubbletea and therefore need to add two new build dependencies: golang-github-mattn-go-localereader [0] and golang-github-muesli-cancelreader [1]. I would appreciate if someone would check the packages and uploads them to the NEW queue

Bug#1023100: ITP: cancelreader -- A cancelable reader for Go

2022-10-30 Thread Martin Dosch
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Martin Dosch * Package name: cancelreader Version : 0.2.2-1 Upstream Author : Christian Muehlhaeuser * URL : https://github.com/muesli/cancelreader * License : Expat Programming Lang: Go Description : A

Bug#1023099: ITP: golang-github-mattn-go-localereader -- CodePage decoder for Windows

2022-10-30 Thread Martin Dosch
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Martin Dosch * Package name: golang-github-mattn-go-localereader Version : 0.0.1-1 Upstream Author : mattn * URL : https://github.com/mattn/go-localereader * License : Expat Programming Lang: Go Description

Re: Version and date shown in the application (ymuse)

2022-10-22 Thread Martin Dosch
Dear all, I had a talk with a DD and he told me that I can't assume that the package is built in a VCS. He also told me my proposal of the version number shown in the about dialogue is OK, so I'll go for that for now. Best regards, Martin signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: Version and date shown in the application (ymuse)

2022-10-22 Thread Martin Dosch
Dear Daniel, thank you for your feedback. On 22.10.2022 14:48, Daniel Swarbrick wrote: I guess if you want the _Debian_ package release date, you can read that into a variable with something like $(shell dpkg-parsechangelog -S date) in debian/rules, and then do whatever is necessary to poke th

Version and date shown in the application (ymuse)

2022-10-22 Thread Martin Dosch
Dear all, ymuse [0] shows the application version and release date in the about dialogue. So far I used the upstream version there and set the date to the latest debian/changelog entry as afaik I can't access the upstream release date during the build. Now I found it a bit weird to show the

Re: RFS: ymuse 0.21-1

2022-10-16 Thread Martin Dosch
Dear Nilesh, thank you very much! Best regards, Martin

Re: RFS: ymuse 0.21-1

2022-10-09 Thread Martin Dosch
Dear Nilesh, On 10.10.2022 00:54, Nilesh Patra wrote: I pushed a few minor cleanup commits. But a couple of questions: thank you very much for checking the packaging, doing the clean up (I was surprised that so many little things slipped through) and for your valuable input. - Since the very

Re: RFS: ymuse 0.21-1

2022-10-09 Thread Martin Dosch
Dear all, sorry, seems I added a wrong link earlier. Here is the correct one: https://salsa.debian.org/go-team/packages/ymuse Best regards, Martin

RFS: ymuse 0.21-1

2022-10-09 Thread Martin Dosch
Dear all, I prepared the initial packaging for ymuse [0] and would appreciate if someone would review it and upload it to the NEW queue if it looks good. Best regards, Martin [0] https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/golang-github-fhs-gompd signature.asc Description: PGP signature

RFS: golang-github-fhs-gompd 2.2.0-1

2022-10-07 Thread Martin Dosch
Dear all, as I am planning to package ymuse, I need a newer version of gompd. Actually I need a current git snapshot but I thought it would be cleaner to package version 2.2.0 first and update to the latest git snapshot later. If you agree and the packaging looks good to you I'd appreciate if

Re: Gitlab CI is failing

2022-09-24 Thread Martin Dosch
Dear Nilesh, On 25.09.2022 00:53, Nilesh Patra wrote: There is a similar bug filed against singularity-container, #1020208. singularity-container uses umoci as B-D and does not vendor it, and this seems a bit odd as it does not have much to do with umoci at all. As far as I can see, a new versi

Gitlab CI is failing

2022-09-24 Thread Martin Dosch
Dear all, for a package the Gitlab CI is failing [1] but I have no idea what is going wrong. I just updated the changelog (`dch -r`) und pushed the tag as I want to upload the package. Otherwise I didn't (knowingly) changed anything compared to three weeks ago when the CI ran successfully. D

Re: How to version the current development version?

2022-09-09 Thread Martin Dosch
Dear Nilesh, thank you for your input. On 09.09.2022 16:31, Nilesh Patra wrote: On Fri, Sep 09, 2022 at 12:53:53PM +0200, Martin Dosch wrote: - Have you checked if ymuse can build with 2.2.0 itself? Yes, that's why I came up with this question. - If not, are the needed changes sma

How to version the current development version?

2022-09-09 Thread Martin Dosch
Dear all, as I intent to package ymuse I need a version of golang-github-fhs-gompd newer than the latest release (2.2.0), therefore I'd like to package the current development state. How should the version look like? Locally I just use `2.2.0+git20220620.bbf8359` for now. Best regards, Mar

Re: RFS: golang-github-protonmail-gopenpgp (2.4.9-1)

2022-09-03 Thread Martin Dosch
Dear Nilesh, On 19.08.2022 21:19, Nilesh Patra wrote: But now that you pointed it out, it should probably have been (>= 0.0~git20220819.33af46d-1~) instead. I adjusted it as there is a new upstream version of gopenpgp available. :) Best regards, Martin signature.asc Description: PGP signa

Re: RFS: golang-github-protonmail-go-crypto 0.0~git20220824.4b6e5c5

2022-09-01 Thread Martin Dosch
On 01.09.2022 22:16, Nilesh Patra wrote: Done. Thank you very much! signature.asc Description: PGP signature

RFS: golang-github-protonmail-go-crypto 0.0~git20220824.4b6e5c5

2022-09-01 Thread Martin Dosch
Dear all, I prepared the packaging of a new upstream version of go-crypto: https://salsa.debian.org/go-team/packages/golang-github-protonmail-go-crypto https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/golang-github-protonmail-go-crypto I would appreciate if someone would check it and upload it if all is alright

Re: On license check in the light of the godiff issue.

2022-08-28 Thread Martin Dosch
Hey Abraham, On 29.08.2022 01:05, Abraham Raji wrote: What can we possibly do to make the situation better? I am pretty new to debian packaging and I am by no means an expert in licensing issues, but from my understanding it should not happen that a package with a dependency on package that

  1   2   >