Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Loren M. Lang
* Package name: golang-github-go-quicktest-qt
Version : 1.101.0-1
Upstream Author :
* URL : https://github.com/go-quicktest/qt
* License : Expat
Programming Lang: Go
Description : Quick helpers for
On Wed, 2024-02-14 at 18:44 +0100, Simon Josefsson wrote:
> This problem happens for others:
>
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1063746
>
> Interestingly the failure seems arch-specific:
>
> https://ci.debian.net/packages/g/golang-github-katalix-go-l2tp/
>
> It could still we
On Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 18:44:54 +0100, Simon Josefsson wrote:
> Tom Parkin writes:
>
> > On Tue, Jan 23, 2024 at 18:05:23 +0100, Simon Josefsson wrote:
> >> Tom Parkin writes:
> >>
> >> > Hi Simon,
> >> >
> >> > On Mon, Jan 22, 2024 at 20:15:11 +0100, Simon Josefsson wrote:
> >> >> golang-g
FYI, I have uploaded golang-github-asaskevich-govalidator to unstable,
version >=11 is needed by rekor. Rekor target targets experimental but
we might as well try to get each reverse dependency into unstable when
that is possible.
/Simon
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Tom Parkin writes:
> On Tue, Jan 23, 2024 at 18:05:23 +0100, Simon Josefsson wrote:
>> Tom Parkin writes:
>>
>> > Hi Simon,
>> >
>> > On Mon, Jan 22, 2024 at 20:15:11 +0100, Simon Josefsson wrote:
>> >> golang-github-katalix-go-l2tp
>> >> https://salsa.debian.org/jas/golang-google-grpc/-/jobs
Praveen Arimbrathodiyil writes:
> On 14/2/24 8:03 AM, Mathias Gibbens wrote:
>> On Mon, 2024-02-12 at 19:08 +0530, Praveen Arimbrathodiyil wrote:
>>> Do we assume SemVer.org compliance for modules with >= 1.0 versions?
>>>
>>> ie, should we assume things will break for every minor updates as
>>>
On 14/2/24 8:03 AM, Mathias Gibbens wrote:
On Mon, 2024-02-12 at 19:08 +0530, Praveen Arimbrathodiyil wrote:
Do we assume SemVer.org compliance for modules with >= 1.0 versions?
ie, should we assume things will break for every minor updates as
well?
I've personally found it to be a very
