Hi
On Wed, Nov 23, 2022 at 12:58:29PM +0530, Praveen Arimbrathodiyil wrote:
>
>
> On 23/11/22 4:34 am, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> > On 11/22/22 17:17, Pirate Praveen wrote:
> > > Hi zigo,
> > >
> > > I can see you have tagged a new version of
> > > golang-github-grpc-ecosystem-go-grpc-middleware i
On Wed, Nov 23, 2022 at 12:58:29PM +0530, Praveen Arimbrathodiyil wrote:
>
>
> On 23/11/22 4:34 am, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> > On 11/22/22 17:17, Pirate Praveen wrote:
> > > Hi zigo,
> > >
> > > I can see you have tagged a new version of
> > > golang-github-grpc-ecosystem-go-grpc-middleware in sa
On 23/11/22 4:34 am, Thomas Goirand wrote:
On 11/22/22 17:17, Pirate Praveen wrote:
Hi zigo,
I can see you have tagged a new version of
golang-github-grpc-ecosystem-go-grpc-middleware in salsa, but it is
not in the archive, did you forget to upload it?
commit c59dc047bfb4e28f58d1bd7b4ded0
On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 02:49:28PM -0500, Nicholas D Steeves wrote:
> Control: retitle -1 RFP: golang-github-pierrec-lz4.v4 -- LZ4 compression and
> decompression in pure Go (v4)
> Control: noowner -1
>
> TLDR: this missing package is blocking updates for syncthing as well as
> golang-github-gocq
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear go maintainers,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package
"golang-github-monochromegane-go-gitignore":
* Package name : golang-github-monochromegane-go-gitignore
Version : 0.0~git20200626.205db1a-1
Upstream contact : NA
*
On 11/22/22 17:17, Pirate Praveen wrote:
Hi zigo,
I can see you have tagged a new version of
golang-github-grpc-ecosystem-go-grpc-middleware in salsa, but it is not
in the archive, did you forget to upload it?
commit c59dc047bfb4e28f58d1bd7b4ded0ddbf7416cf2 (HEAD -> master, tag:
debian/1.3.
Hi zigo,
I can see you have tagged a new version of
golang-github-grpc-ecosystem-go-grpc-middleware in salsa, but it is not
in the archive, did you forget to upload it?
commit c59dc047bfb4e28f58d1bd7b4ded0ddbf7416cf2 (HEAD -> master, tag:
debian/1.3.0-1, origin/master, origin/HEAD)
Also th
[ Adding 837...@bugs.debian.org and the submitter to Cc for the reasons
explained below ].
El 22/11/22 a las 13:09, Guillem Jover escribió:
So it seems to me we have a bunch of packages that are prio:required
but not Essential (some have switched to Protected:yes), that should
get their priori
On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 21:32:37 +0800, Shengjing Zhu wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 9:07 PM Santiago Vila wrote:
> > El 21/11/22 a las 3:19, Shengjing Zhu escribió:
> > > tzdata's priority is required. Is this an effort to make tzdata optional?
> >
> > Being "priority: required", being "essenti
El 21/11/22 a las 14:32, Shengjing Zhu escribió:
On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 9:07 PM Santiago Vila wrote:
Being "priority: required", being "essential: yes", and being
build-essential are all three different things.
My intent is to keep stable free from FTBFS bugs, i.e. packages which do
not follo
10 matches
Mail list logo
