Re: Update of golang-github-gdamore-cell to 2.*

2021-01-24 Thread Daniel Milde
Hi Stephen, I have consulted with another dev (Ondrej Novy) and he told me that they all should be uploaded at once. Thanks Daniel Dne 25. 01. 21 v 1:37 Stephen Gelman napsal(a): OK, I uploaded golang-github-gdamore-tcell.v2. I think that might need to clear NEW before I can upload golang-gi

Re: Podman 3.0 and Debian bullseye

2021-01-24 Thread Dmitry Smirnov
On Monday, 25 January 2021 12:02:26 PM AEDT Reinhard Tartler wrote: > - Podman 3 drops the legacy varlink interface. To the best of my > knowledge, there are no packages in debian/testing that would require > varlink (please correct me if I'm wrong here). Not having to support > varlink in Debian

Podman 3.0 and Debian bullseye

2021-01-24 Thread Reinhard Tartler
Dear release-team, I'm proposing to have podman 3.0 in debian/bullseye. As maintainer of the package, I'm convinced this is a good step for Debian because: - podman 3.0 will be included in RHEL 8.4, which will be released in May 2021. I expect security support for podman in Debian to become sign

Re: Update of golang-github-gdamore-cell to 2.*

2021-01-24 Thread Stephen Gelman
Hmm, that one is super weird. I have never really looked at the CI pipeline before. Does anyone else have any ideas? Stephen > On Jan 24, 2021, at 4:04 PM, Daniel Milde wrote: > > Hi Stephen, > I have upgraded gdu to 4.3.0 and noticed that the pipeline is always failing > - https://salsa.debi

Re: Update of golang-github-gdamore-cell to 2.*

2021-01-24 Thread Stephen Gelman
OK, I uploaded golang-github-gdamore-tcell.v2. I think that might need to clear NEW before I can upload golang-github-rivo-tview and therefore gdu. If this is wrong, please, someone correct me and I’ll upload the others now! Stephen > On Jan 24, 2021, at 1:32 PM, Daniel Milde wrote: > > Hi St

Re: Update of golang-github-gdamore-cell to 2.*

2021-01-24 Thread Daniel Milde
Hi Stephen, I have upgraded gdu to 4.3.0 and noticed that the pipeline is always failing - https://salsa.debian.org/go-team/packages/gdu/-/jobs/1377762 Looks like some conflicting config. Does it need some ENV variable to be set for the project? Thanks Daniel Dne 24. 01. 21 v 8:08 Stephen Gel

Re: Bug#978650: podman: please provide a default container registry for looking up short image names

2021-01-24 Thread Reinhard Tartler
On Sun, Jan 24, 2021 at 9:12 AM Reinhard Tartler wrote: > > > On Sun, Jan 24, 2021 at 7:54 AM Shengjing Zhu wrote: > >> On Sun, Jan 24, 2021 at 8:44 PM Reinhard Tartler >> wrote: >> > >> > Context is what version of podman to ship in Debian bullseye >> [...] >> > >> > One could be to let's go s

Re: Update of golang-github-gdamore-cell to 2.*

2021-01-24 Thread Daniel Milde
Hi Stephen, my bad. I was testing it only with gbp and hadn't have clean environment. Fixed now. Thanks Daniel Dne 24. 01. 21 v 8:08 Stephen Gelman napsal(a): Daniel, I am unable to build golang-github-gdamore-tcell.v2 in a clean pbuilder. I get a long list of errors such as: src/gopkg.in/

Re: Bug#978650: podman: please provide a default container registry for looking up short image names

2021-01-24 Thread Antoine Beaupré
On 2021-01-24 13:57:48, Reinhard Tartler wrote: > On Sun, Jan 24, 2021 at 1:44 PM Antoine Beaupré wrote: > >> >> Could we still upload 2.1 or 2.2 to unstable in the meantime to have at >> least an update on that front that's solid? >> >> > Debian testing (bullseye)/unstable currently ship with ver

Re: Bug#978650: podman: please provide a default container registry for looking up short image names

2021-01-24 Thread Reinhard Tartler
On Sun, Jan 24, 2021 at 1:44 PM Antoine Beaupré wrote: > > Could we still upload 2.1 or 2.2 to unstable in the meantime to have at > least an update on that front that's solid? > > Debian testing (bullseye)/unstable currently ship with version 2.1.1. cf. https://packages.qa.debian.org/libp/libpod

Re: Bug#978650: podman: please provide a default container registry for looking up short image names

2021-01-24 Thread Antoine Beaupré
On 2021-01-24 09:12:13, Reinhard Tartler wrote: > On Sun, Jan 24, 2021 at 7:54 AM Shengjing Zhu wrote: > >> On Sun, Jan 24, 2021 at 8:44 PM Reinhard Tartler >> wrote: >> > >> > Context is what version of podman to ship in Debian bullseye >> [...] >> > >> > One could be to let's go straight for po

Re: Bug#978650: podman: please provide a default container registry for looking up short image names

2021-01-24 Thread Reinhard Tartler
On Sun, Jan 24, 2021 at 7:54 AM Shengjing Zhu wrote: > On Sun, Jan 24, 2021 at 8:44 PM Reinhard Tartler > wrote: > > > > Context is what version of podman to ship in Debian bullseye > [...] > > > > One could be to let's go straight for podman 3.0. Since Debian is going > to have a > > hard-freez

Re: Bug#978650: podman: please provide a default container registry for looking up short image names

2021-01-24 Thread Shengjing Zhu
On Sun, Jan 24, 2021 at 8:44 PM Reinhard Tartler wrote: > > Context is what version of podman to ship in Debian bullseye [...] > > One could be to let's go straight for podman 3.0. Since Debian is going to > have a > hard-freeze on 2021-03-12, that's kind of tight, but if doable if we > collabor

Re: Bug#978650: podman: please provide a default container registry for looking up short image names

2021-01-24 Thread Reinhard Tartler
Context is what version of podman to ship in Debian bullseye On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 11:29 AM Antonio Terceiro wrote: > On Sat, Jan 09, 2021 at 12:58:05PM +0200, Faidon Liambotis wrote: > > Hi there, > > > > On Thu, Dec 31, 2020 at 01:39:52PM -0500, Reinhard Tartler wrote: > > > As I thought. Ex