Re: RFS: Bug#953403: ITP: golang-k8s-sigs-structured-merge-diff -- Test cases and implementation for "server-side apply"

2020-05-14 Thread Shengjing Zhu
On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 1:13 PM Tong Sun wrote: > > On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 1:03 AM Shengjing Zhu wrote: > > > > On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 1:00 PM Tong Sun > > wrote: > > > > > > On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 12:54 AM Tong Sun > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 12:51 AM Shengjing Zhu

Re: RFS: Bug#953403: ITP: golang-k8s-sigs-structured-merge-diff -- Test cases and implementation for "server-side apply"

2020-05-14 Thread Tong Sun
On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 1:03 AM Shengjing Zhu wrote: > > On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 1:00 PM Tong Sun > wrote: > > > > On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 12:54 AM Tong Sun > > wrote: > > > > > > On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 12:51 AM Shengjing Zhu wrote: > > > > > > > > On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 12:44 PM Tong Sun > >

Re: RFS: Bug#953403: ITP: golang-k8s-sigs-structured-merge-diff -- Test cases and implementation for "server-side apply"

2020-05-14 Thread Shengjing Zhu
On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 1:00 PM Tong Sun wrote: > > On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 12:54 AM Tong Sun > wrote: > > > > On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 12:51 AM Shengjing Zhu wrote: > > > > > > On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 12:44 PM Tong Sun > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > Please help review the foll

Re: RFS: Bug#953403: ITP: golang-k8s-sigs-structured-merge-diff -- Test cases and implementation for "server-side apply"

2020-05-14 Thread Tong Sun
On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 12:54 AM Tong Sun wrote: > > On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 12:51 AM Shengjing Zhu wrote: > > > > On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 12:44 PM Tong Sun > > wrote: > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > Please help review the following package: > > > > > > https://salsa.debian.org/go-team/packages/gola

Re: RFS: Bug#953403: ITP: golang-k8s-sigs-structured-merge-diff -- Test cases and implementation for "server-side apply"

2020-05-14 Thread Tong Sun
On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 12:51 AM Shengjing Zhu wrote: > > On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 12:44 PM Tong Sun > wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > Please help review the following package: > > > > https://salsa.debian.org/go-team/packages/golang-k8s-sigs-structured-merge-diff > > > > Could you package the latest v

Re: RFS: Bug#953403: ITP: golang-k8s-sigs-structured-merge-diff -- Test cases and implementation for "server-side apply"

2020-05-14 Thread Shengjing Zhu
On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 12:44 PM Tong Sun wrote: > > Hi, > > Please help review the following package: > > https://salsa.debian.org/go-team/packages/golang-k8s-sigs-structured-merge-diff > Could you package the latest version, aka v3.0.0? -- Shengjing Zhu

Re: cross building go packages?

2020-05-14 Thread Helmut Grohne
On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 08:34:48AM +1200, Michael Hudson-Doyle wrote: > On Fri, 15 May 2020 at 06:18, Helmut Grohne wrote: > > I did not propose "golang-any". > > golang-any is a package that already exists. It exists to allow packages to > build with "Google Go" (i.e. golang-go) on architectures

RFS: Bug#953403: ITP: golang-k8s-sigs-structured-merge-diff -- Test cases and implementation for "server-side apply"

2020-05-14 Thread Tong Sun
Hi, Please help review the following package: https://salsa.debian.org/go-team/packages/golang-k8s-sigs-structured-merge-diff Thanks -- Forwarded message - From: Tong Sun Date: Sun, Mar 8, 2020 at 11:42 PM Subject: Bug#953403: ITP: golang-k8s-sigs-structured-merge-diff -- Test

Re: cross building go packages?

2020-05-14 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
On Fri, 15 May 2020 at 06:18, Helmut Grohne wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 12:25:44AM +0800, Shengjing Zhu wrote: > > Since all packages (should) depends on golang-any, not golang-go. It's > > possible to archive the goal by changing the depends of golang-any? > > I did not propose "gol

Re: cross building go packages?

2020-05-14 Thread Helmut Grohne
Hi, On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 12:25:44AM +0800, Shengjing Zhu wrote: > Since all packages (should) depends on golang-any, not golang-go. It's > possible to archive the goal by changing the depends of golang-any? I did not propose "golang-any". The options were roughly: 1. golang-go (no cross compi

Re: cross building go packages?

2020-05-14 Thread Shengjing Zhu
On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 12:16 AM Helmut Grohne wrote: [...] > > * canid > * go-qrcode > * golang-bindata > * golang-github-benbjohnson-tmpl > * golang-github-calmh-xdr > * golang-github-eknkc-amber > * golang-github-odeke-em-ripper > * golang-github-rakyll-statik > * golang-gogoprotobuf >

Re: cross building go packages?

2020-05-14 Thread Shengjing Zhu
On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 12:16 AM Helmut Grohne wrote: [...] > > All options but 1 and 3 require changing almost all go-related source > packages. Are there any tools to mass-commit such changes to many go > packages? Since all packages (should) depends on golang-any, not golang-go. It's possible

cross building go packages?

2020-05-14 Thread Helmut Grohne
Hi go people, I've vaguely looked into cross compiling go packages since a while. The first steps were making dh-golang supply the correct environment (see #960255 and #945479). Thank you for applying these patches. Later on, I've started filing bugs about Multi-Arch metadata (mostly Multi-Arch: