rsions of packages libc6 depends on:
ii libgcc1 1:4.2.2-3 GCC support library
libc6 recommends no packages.
-- debconf information:
glibc/restart-failed:
glibc/restart-services:
--
Uwe Kleine-König, Software Engineer
Digi International GmbH Branch Breisach, Küf
Package: libc6
Version: 2.21-0experimental0
Severity: normal
Tags: upstream fixed-upstream
Forwarded: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18463
Hello,
the attached program fails with an error on ARM platforms. (I only tested
armhf, but I think armel is affected, too.)
The problem is
Package: libc6
Version: 2.7-18
Severity: normal
Hello,
I think http://bugs.debian.org/534352 is actually a libc problem,
because _tid in struct sigevent isn't available in the libc headers, but
is available on the kernel side.
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior provided patches for three of the four
affe
]
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?msg=10;filename=tid_fix_s390_ia64.patch;att=2;bug=534352
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König|
Industrial Linux Solutions| http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian
On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 10:59:40AM -0700, Josh Triplett wrote:
> Package: libc6
> Version: 2.19-15
> Severity: important
>
> I'm on a network that has somewhat broken DNS: attempts to resolve
> records for some hosts produce long timeouts.
>
> As I understand it, glibc is supposed to check w
Package: libc6
Version: 2.24-8
Severity: normal
Tags: upstream patch
Hello,
for ease of reproducibility I show my examples in Python, but I verified
that the problem is in glibc and not in Python:
On a machine without network access I get:
>>> import socket
>>> socket.getaddrinf
Package: libc6
Version: 2.24-8
Severity: normal
Tags: upstream
Hello,
quoting getaddrinfo(3):
According to POSIX.1-2001, specifying hints as NULL should cause
ai_flags to be assumed as 0. The GNU C library instead assumes a value
of (AI_V4MAPPED | AI_ADDRCONFIG) fo
Hello,
On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 08:03:00PM +, Niels Thykier wrote:
> armel/armhf:
>
>
> * Undesirable to keep the hardware running beyond 2020. armhf VM
>support uncertain. (DSA)
>- Source: [DSA Sprint report]
>
> [DSA Sprint report]:
> https://lists.debian.org/debian-p
Hello Julien,
On 06/29/2018 11:23 AM, Julien Cristau wrote:
>> If the concerns are mostly about the hardware not being rackable, there
>> is a rackable NAS by Netgear:
>>
>>
>> https://www.netgear.com/business/products/storage/readynas/RN2120.aspx#tab-techspecs
>>
>> with an armhf cpu. Not s
Hello Aurelien,
the problem described by Christoph happens for me, too.
On Thu, Dec 12, 2024 at 06:28:34PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> On 2024-12-12 00:19, Christoph Egger wrote:
> > Package: tzdata
> > Version: 2024a-0+deb12u1
> > Severity: important
> >
> > Hi!
> >
> > tzdata update fails
Hello Aurelien,
On Mon, Dec 30, 2024 at 09:48:11PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> On 2024-12-30 21:32, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > the problem described by Christoph happens for me, too.
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 12, 2024 at 06:28:34PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > >
11 matches
Mail list logo
