Bug#258647: libc6-sparc64 has no reason to depend on lib64gcc1

2004-07-10 Thread Nikita V. Youshchenko
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Package: libc6-sparc64 Version: 2.3.2.ds1-13 Package libc6-sparc64 has no reason to depend on lib64gcc1. None of libraries provided by libc6-sparc64 are linked agains this library. With the current situation, I'm getting checken-and-egg problem whil

Bug#258647: libc6-sparc64 has no reason to depend on lib64gcc1

2004-07-12 Thread Nikita V. Youshchenko
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 > At Sun, 11 Jul 2004 00:51:14 +0400, > > Nikita V. Youshchenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Package: libc6-sparc64 > > Version: 2.3.2.ds1-13 > > > > Package libc6-sparc64 has no reason to depend on lib64

Re: Bug#317501: amd64-libs-dev conflicts with linux-kernel-headers

2005-07-11 Thread Nikita V. Youshchenko
> so we can start converting the packages you > mentioned to biarch. Oh, please do! This at last will make it possible to build biarch gcc cross compiler package for x86 target in the debian way (i.e. using current dpkg-cross-based approach). -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a

Re: Bug#317082: libc6-s390x: missing depends on lib64gcc1

2005-07-25 Thread Nikita V. Youshchenko
> BTW, Nikita, dpkg-shlibdeps in dpkg-cross should have additional elf64 > entries for ppc64 and amd64 like: > > @crosslib64formats = ("elf64-sparc", "elf64-s390", "elf64-x86-64", > "elf64-powerpc"); Thank you for mentioning that. I've committed this change. However, before new upload of dpk

Re: Bug#317082: Not just a dpkg bug

2005-08-21 Thread Nikita V. Youshchenko
> objdump isn't a solution either, while it sometimes can read the other > shared library, it doesn't provide the linker search patch which is of > critical importance to get this stuff right. Hmm... But what for is that search path? As far as I understand, dpkg-shlibdeps should just get NEEDED so

Bug#329126: please add conflict with sarge gawk to post-sarge libc6

2005-09-19 Thread Nikita V. Youshchenko
Package: libc6 Version: 2.3.5-6 Severity: normal [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~> echo -n | fakeroot awk '{print}' awk: relocation error: awk: symbol _dl_catch_error, version GLIBC_PRIVATE not defined in file ld-linux.so.2 with link time reference This is fixed in post-sarge gawk 3.1.4-2.0.1. This may affe

Bug#317082: Not just a dpkg bug

2006-01-20 Thread Nikita V. Youshchenko
Hello people. > > > objdump isn't a solution either, while it sometimes can read the > > > other shared library, it doesn't provide the linker search patch > > > which is of critical importance to get this stuff right. > > > > Hmm... > > But what for is that search path? > > As far as I understand

Bug#317082: Not just a dpkg bug

2006-01-24 Thread Nikita V. Youshchenko
> On Sun, Jan 22, 2006 at 10:14:16PM +0100, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > > I've implemented this option. Patch and new script (since the patch is > > garbled with a little code clean-up I did while going through the > > script) are attached. > > > > Comments and/or testing welcome. > > Comment to my

Bug#317082: Not just a dpkg bug

2006-01-24 Thread Nikita V. Youshchenko
> On Tue, Jan 24, 2006 at 06:43:02PM +0300, Nikita V. Youshchenko wrote: > > dpkg-shlibdeps calls ldd, which will just fail if LD_LIBRARY_PATH > > won't point to directories with local libraries. > > That's not true. ldd will just happily print "libfoo.so.1 =&g

Bug#317082: Not just a dpkg bug

2006-01-24 Thread Nikita V. Youshchenko
> On Tue, Jan 24, 2006 at 06:05:43PM +0300, Nikita V. Youshchenko wrote: > > > On Sun, Jan 22, 2006 at 10:14:16PM +0100, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > > > Comment to myself: The current patch probably breaks dh_shlibdeps > > > -l option because it doesn't

Bug#351629: Recent libc6-dev broke compatibility with sarge binutils and gcc-3.3

2006-02-06 Thread Nikita V. Youshchenko
Package: libc6-dev Version: 2.3.5-12.1 Severity: important After upgrade libc6 to 2.3.5-12.1 our locat projects failed to build. Minimal test that reproduces the problem: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/adm/libc> cat t.c #include void at() {} int f(void) { atexit(&at); return 0; } [EMAIL

Bug#344563: Easy fix ?

2006-04-27 Thread Nikita V. Youshchenko
> Removing the databases in /var/db/nscd/ resolved the problem. So why not just remove old files on nscd package upgrade?.. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#351629: Again this thing :(

2006-04-27 Thread Nikita V. Youshchenko
found 351629 2.3.6-7 thanks Again this bug. Have to downgrade libc6 from snapshots.debian.net ... :( -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#395288: upgrade of linux-kernel-headers broke #include from user-space

2006-10-26 Thread Nikita V. Youshchenko
Package: linux-kernel-headers Version: 2.6.18-3 Severity: normal /usr/include/asm/system.h file used to provide access to useful low-level x86 facilities, such as cmpxchg CPU instruction. Only add #include to program and then use it. However, this stopped working after recent upgrade of linux-k

Bug#215247: libc6: iconv seems not to handle utf-8 as specified in rfc2279

2003-10-11 Thread Nikita V. Youshchenko
Package: libc6 Version: 2.3.2-8 Severity: normal UTF-8 encoding is specified in RFC2279 as follows: UCS-4 range (hex.) UTF-8 octet sequence (binary) - 007F 0xxx 0080- 07FF 110x 10xx 0800- 1110 10xx 10xx 00

Bug#216244: [libc6] Incomplete interaction with nscd

2003-10-17 Thread Nikita V. Youshchenko
Package: libc6 Version: 2.3.2-8 Severity: normal Several time ago, what I was migrating my systems to LDAP, I noticed some nss-related trouble (e.g. finger was unable to show information about LDAP users, although /etc/nsswitch was set correctly, and other tools worked). I even reported several bu

Bug#215337: This seems to be rather bad, and probably should be fixed

2003-11-15 Thread Nikita V. Youshchenko
First, this bug is still there in current libc6 from unstable: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~> cat t.c #include [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~> gcc-2.95 -c -Wall t.c In file included from /usr/include/asm/sigcontext.h:4, from /usr/include/bits/sigcontext.h:28, from /usr/include/signa

Bug#48705: timezones and libc5 compatability

1999-10-30 Thread Nikita V. Youshchenko
Package: libc6 Version 2.1.2-5 Timezones that are provided with libc6 do not have a symlink /usr/share/zoneinfo/localtime -> /etc/localtime But this symlink is required for libc5 compatability. Without it, e.g. libc5 netscape shows incorrect date and time in mail windows. I have reported this

jdk 1.3.1 ?

2002-10-29 Thread Nikita V. Youshchenko
Hello Is there any way to make jdk 1.3.1 to work with the new libc? Maybe some hack? Currently, it fails with the following message: Error occurred during initialization of VM Unable to load native library: /usr/opt/sun-jdk-1.3.1/jre/lib/i386/libjava.so: symbol __libc_wait, version GLIBC_2.0

Re: jdk 1.3.1 ?

2002-10-29 Thread Nikita V. Youshchenko
> On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 06:14:29PM +0300, Nikita V. Youshchenko wrote: > > Is there any way to make jdk 1.3.1 to work with the new libc? Maybe > > some hack? > > Not in any sort of supported way. If you need 1.3.1, perhaps try the > blackdown jvm - It still works. Thank you. It really works.

Re: Bug#167256: libc6: LIBC6 forgets to restart XDM

2002-11-01 Thread Nikita V. Youshchenko
> > When libc6 installs it forgets to restart XDM. On my server, I had to > restart it manually because none of my users who access the system via > XDM where able to login It is not safe to restart xdm. It may cause running sessions to fail immidiatly. In general, seems that libc 2.2 -> glibc

Bug#171851: libc6-dev: math.h does not declare trunc();

2002-12-05 Thread Nikita V. Youshchenko
Package: libc6-dev Version: 2.3.1-5 Severity: normal Libc documentation states that trunc() function is declared in math.h. However, math.h provided by current libc6-dev does not declared in math.h or any header included from math.h > cat x.cpp #include int main() { double d = trunc(3.5)

jdk 1.3.1 ?

2002-10-29 Thread Nikita V. Youshchenko
Hello Is there any way to make jdk 1.3.1 to work with the new libc? Maybe some hack? Currently, it fails with the following message: Error occurred during initialization of VM Unable to load native library: /usr/opt/sun-jdk-1.3.1/jre/lib/i386/libjava.so: symbol __libc_wait, version GLIBC_2.0

Re: jdk 1.3.1 ?

2002-10-29 Thread Nikita V. Youshchenko
> On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 06:14:29PM +0300, Nikita V. Youshchenko wrote: > > Is there any way to make jdk 1.3.1 to work with the new libc? Maybe > > some hack? > > Not in any sort of supported way. If you need 1.3.1, perhaps try the > blackdown jvm - It still works. Th

Re: Bug#167256: libc6: LIBC6 forgets to restart XDM

2002-11-01 Thread Nikita V. Youshchenko
> > When libc6 installs it forgets to restart XDM. On my server, I had to > restart it manually because none of my users who access the system via > XDM where able to login It is not safe to restart xdm. It may cause running sessions to fail immidiatly. In general, seems that libc 2.2 -> glibc

Bug#171851: libc6-dev: math.h does not declare trunc();

2002-12-05 Thread Nikita V. Youshchenko
Package: libc6-dev Version: 2.3.1-5 Severity: normal Libc documentation states that trunc() function is declared in math.h. However, math.h provided by current libc6-dev does not declared in math.h or any header included from math.h > cat x.cpp #include int main() { double d = trunc(3.5)

Bug#215247: libc6: iconv seems not to handle utf-8 as specified in rfc2279

2003-10-11 Thread Nikita V. Youshchenko
Package: libc6 Version: 2.3.2-8 Severity: normal UTF-8 encoding is specified in RFC2279 as follows: UCS-4 range (hex.) UTF-8 octet sequence (binary) - 007F 0xxx 0080- 07FF 110x 10xx 0800- 1110 10xx 10xx 00

Bug#216244: [libc6] Incomplete interaction with nscd

2003-10-17 Thread Nikita V. Youshchenko
Package: libc6 Version: 2.3.2-8 Severity: normal Several time ago, what I was migrating my systems to LDAP, I noticed some nss-related trouble (e.g. finger was unable to show information about LDAP users, although /etc/nsswitch was set correctly, and other tools worked). I even reported several bu

Bug#215337: This seems to be rather bad, and probably should be fixed

2003-11-15 Thread Nikita V. Youshchenko
First, this bug is still there in current libc6 from unstable: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~> cat t.c #include [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~> gcc-2.95 -c -Wall t.c In file included from /usr/include/asm/sigcontext.h:4, from /usr/include/bits/sigcontext.h:28, from /usr/include/signa

Is it possible to make ld.so not to use oprimized libraries?

2004-05-20 Thread Nikita V. Youshchenko
Hello. I have libc6-686 package installed, and most programs work correctly with optimized libraries. However, there are at least two examples of program crashes when optimized libraries are used (one is mencoder, another is crossopver office running word). It is possible to make individual p

Is it possible to make ld.so not to use oprimized libraries?

2004-05-20 Thread Nikita V. Youshchenko
Hello. I have libc6-686 package installed, and most programs work correctly with optimized libraries. However, there are at least two examples of program crashes when optimized libraries are used (one is mencoder, another is crossopver office running word). It is possible to make individual p

Bug#258647: libc6-sparc64 has no reason to depend on lib64gcc1

2004-07-10 Thread Nikita V. Youshchenko
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Package: libc6-sparc64 Version: 2.3.2.ds1-13 Package libc6-sparc64 has no reason to depend on lib64gcc1. None of libraries provided by libc6-sparc64 are linked agains this library. With the current situation, I'm getting checken-and-egg problem whil

Bug#258647: libc6-sparc64 has no reason to depend on lib64gcc1

2004-07-11 Thread Nikita V. Youshchenko
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 > At Sun, 11 Jul 2004 00:51:14 +0400, > > Nikita V. Youshchenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Package: libc6-sparc64 > > Version: 2.3.2.ds1-13 > > > > Package libc6-sparc64 has no reason to depend on lib64

Re: NSCD doesn't support services?

2004-10-13 Thread Nikita V. Youshchenko
> My libnss-ldap.conf isn't world readable, to protect my LDAP password. Does 'finger user' work under non-root with such configuration? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]