Bug#279722: libc6: application sometimes crashes, valgrind shows error in gconv_db.c

2005-02-17 Thread Bill Allombert
On Thu, Feb 03, 2005 at 05:36:44PM +0100, Loïc Minier wrote: > Hi, > > This is a followup for Debian bug . > > I already tried in the past to build glibc on my system, and this was > too long a task for my laptop, could someone try swapping the free > af

Re: Bug#522776: debian-policy: mandate existence of a standardised UTF-8 locale

2010-09-04 Thread Bill Allombert
On Sat, Sep 04, 2010 at 12:37:07AM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Aurelien Jarno, le Fri 03 Sep 2010 19:16:40 +0200, a écrit : > > On Fri, Sep 03, 2010 at 04:20:27PM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > > Roger Leigh, le Fri 03 Sep 2010 14:52:39 +0100, a écrit : > > > > There were no objections to ha

Bug#521863: popen broken on some systems

2009-03-30 Thread Bill Allombert
Package: libc6 Version: 2.9-6 Severity: important Hello Debian GLIBC maintainers, popen is broken on some systems, though details are scare, it seems it affect some amd64 with libc6 version 2.9-6 and kernel 2.6.26-1-amd64. The following menu bugs are related to this problem: #520989 #520916 #511

Bug#521863: popen broken on some systems

2009-03-30 Thread Bill Allombert
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 05:36:36PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote: > Package: libc6 > Version: 2.9-6 > Severity: important > > Hello Debian GLIBC maintainers, > > popen is broken on some systems, though details are scare, > it seems it affect some amd64 with libc6 version 2

Bug#521863: popen broken on some systems

2009-03-30 Thread Bill Allombert
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 06:41:26PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote: > On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 05:36:36PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote: > > Package: libc6 > > Version: 2.9-6 > > Severity: important > > > > Hello Debian GLIBC maintainers, > > > > popen

Bug#563724: libc6 use syscall utimensat unimplemented by etch kernel

2010-01-04 Thread Bill Allombert
Package: libc6 Version: 2.10.2-3 Hello Debian libc maintainers, I run a sid chroot on top of etch, using the etch kernel linux 2.6.18-6-686, and dpkg started to fail with tar: ./preinst: Cannot utime: Bad file descriptor touch also fails: %mkdir /tmp/bar %touch /tmp/bar touch: setting times of

Bug#570674: libc6-dev: gcc-2.95: bits/pthreadtypes.h: unnamed struct/union warning

2010-02-20 Thread Bill Allombert
Package: libc6-dev Version: 2.10.2-6 Severity: minor Tags: patch Hello GNU Libc Maintainers, When using gcc 2.95, gcc report a warning: %gcc-2.95 -Wno-main foo.c -c In file included from /usr/include/sys/types.h:270, from /usr/include/stdlib.h:320, from foo.c:1:

Bug#581835: libc6: circular Pre-Depends loop caused by Depends: debconf

2010-05-16 Thread Bill Allombert
Package: libc6 Version: 2.10.2-8 Severity: serious Hello GNU Libc Maintainers, libc6 now Depends on debconf. This creates a circular (pre)-dependency hell. You can see it at Specifically: (->: Depends, =>: Pre-Depends) libc6 -> debconf => pe

Bug#707813: libc6/debconf: circular predependency hell

2013-05-11 Thread Bill Allombert
Package: libc6 Version: 1.5.50 Severity: important Hello libc6 maintainers, There is a circular Pre-Depends loop between debconf, dpkg, libbz2-1.0, libc6, libgcc1, liblzma5, libpcre3, libselinux1, multiarch-support, perl-base, tar and zlib1g: One is due to the dependency on debconf and the other

Bug#707813: libc6/debconf: circular predependency hell

2013-05-12 Thread Bill Allombert
On Sat, May 11, 2013 at 04:50:22PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > On Sat, May 11, 2013 at 02:34:04PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote: > > Package: libc6 > > Version: 1.5.50 > > Severity: important > > > > Hello libc6 maintainers, > > > > There is a ci

Bug#975077: libc6: circular dependencies

2020-11-18 Thread Bill Allombert
Package: libc6 Version: 2.31-4 Severity: important Hello GNU libc maintainers, There is a circular dependency between libc6, debconf, dpkg, libacl1, libbz2-1.0, libcom-err2, libcrypt1, libgcc-s1, libgssapi-krb5-2, libk5crypto3, libkeyutils1, libkrb5-3, libkrb5support0, liblzma5, libnsl2, libnss-n

Bug#410581: linux-kernel-headers: file conflict with amd64-libs-dev

2007-02-11 Thread Bill Allombert
Package: linux-kernel-headers Version: 2.6.18-6 Severity: serious Justification: Break sarge to etch upgrade Hello GLibc maintainers, There is an error when upgrading the package from sarge to etch, it should Replaces amd64-libs-dev: Preparing to replace linux-kernel-headers 2.5.999-test7-bk-17

Bug#378191: locales-all still ship README.Debian

2007-04-19 Thread Bill Allombert
found 378191 2.5-3 quit Hello GNU Libc Maintainers, locales-all still include the file /usr/share/doc/locales-all/README.Debian which was supposed to be removed in version 2.3.6-16 Cheers, -- Bill. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Imagine a large red swirl here. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROT

Bug#357676: ld.so documentation is outdated

2006-03-18 Thread Bill Allombert
Package: libc6 Version: 2.3.6-3 Severity: normal Dear Debian GLibc maintainers, info libc does not seem to document the behaviour of ld.so. man ld.so is old and does not mention new files like /etc/ld.so.conf and /etc/ld.so.nohwcap. Cheers, -- Bill. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Imagine a large red swi

Bug#219664: linux/compiler.h give warning with gcc -Wall

2003-11-07 Thread Bill Allombert
Package: linux-kernel-headers Version: 2.5.999-test7-bk-8 Severity: normal Dear Glibc maintainers, Since a few days, the following program ---test.c #include - give: $ gcc-2.95 -c -Wall test.c 2>&1 In file included from /usr/include/asm/sigcontext.h:4, f

Bug#224665: misleading error text `FATAL: cannot determine library version'

2003-12-20 Thread Bill Allombert
Package: libc6 Version: 2.3.2.ds1-10 Severity: minor Hello, Debian GLibc maintainers, sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/dl-osinfo.h read: #define DL_SYSDEP_OSCHECK(FATAL) \ do {\ /* Test whether the kernel is new enough. Th

Bug#193904: [reopen #174253] locales.alias even lines are not considered

2003-05-19 Thread Bill Allombert
Package: locales Version: 2.3.1-17 Severity: important Hello Debian glibc maintainers, This bug is basically a reopen of #174253 which has been closed a bit hastily and is archived now. --- How to reproduce the problem: Set up fr_FR ISO-8859-1 in locales.gen Use the Debian provided locale.alias

Bug#219664: linux/compiler.h give warning with gcc -Wall

2003-11-07 Thread Bill Allombert
Package: linux-kernel-headers Version: 2.5.999-test7-bk-8 Severity: normal Dear Glibc maintainers, Since a few days, the following program ---test.c #include - give: $ gcc-2.95 -c -Wall test.c 2>&1 In file included from /usr/include/asm/sigcontext.h:4, f

Bug#224665: misleading error text `FATAL: cannot determine library version'

2003-12-20 Thread Bill Allombert
Package: libc6 Version: 2.3.2.ds1-10 Severity: minor Hello, Debian GLibc maintainers, sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/dl-osinfo.h read: #define DL_SYSDEP_OSCHECK(FATAL) \ do {\ /* Test whether the kernel is new enough. Th

Re: fenris: FTBFS: Cannot execute /lib/libc.so.6

2004-02-13 Thread Bill Allombert
On Sat, Jan 31, 2004 at 08:37:21AM -0800, Daniel Schepler wrote: > Package: fenris > Severity: serious > Version: 1:0.07build3244-2.1 > > >From my build log: > > ... > [+] Version (build): 0.07-m (3244) > [*] Overriding sanity checks! Yuppi! > [+] Operating system check: Linux (supported) > [+] P

Re: fenris: FTBFS: Cannot execute /lib/libc.so.6

2004-02-13 Thread Bill Allombert
On Sat, Jan 31, 2004 at 08:37:21AM -0800, Daniel Schepler wrote: > Package: fenris > Severity: serious > Version: 1:0.07build3244-2.1 > > >From my build log: > > ... > [+] Version (build): 0.07-m (3244) > [*] Overriding sanity checks! Yuppi! > [+] Operating system check: Linux (supported) > [+] P

Bug#277972: glibc: Please change the remaining instances of 'lib64' to 'lib' on amd64

2004-10-30 Thread Bill Allombert
On Mon, Oct 25, 2004 at 08:18:40AM +0200, Andreas Jochens wrote: > On 04-Oct-24 23:24, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > > On Sun, Oct 24, 2004 at 10:18:15PM +0200, Andreas Jochens wrote: > > > > > > This patch is harmless with respect to any LSB requirement. > > > The name of the dynamic loader, which is code

Bug#277972: glibc: Please change the remaining instances of 'lib64' to 'lib' on amd64

2004-10-30 Thread Bill Allombert
On Sat, Oct 30, 2004 at 04:12:01PM +0200, Andreas Jochens wrote: > > Does your binaries run on other x86-64 distributions without any compat > > symlinks ? I think this is an absolute requirement for pure64. > > The binaries will run on all distributions which have > the interpreter accessible as

Bug#279722: libc6: application sometimes crashes, valgrind shows error in gconv_db.c

2004-12-05 Thread Bill Allombert
On Sat, Nov 06, 2004 at 12:43:36PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > "Invalid read" is not a memory leak - this says something has been > freed and then used. It looks like the destructors are running in the > wrong order, maybe. > > We'd still need a testcase. A somewhat crappy testcase: $ apt-

Bug#1099624: libc6 2.41 pthread cause pari to FTBFS

2025-03-15 Thread Bill Allombert
On Mon, Mar 10, 2025 at 12:24:43PM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote: > On Fri, Mar 07, 2025 at 11:45:10AM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote: > > I am still unsure wether there is a race condition in PARI or not, however > > if > > there is, it is clear that 2.41 makes the issue m

Bug#1099624: libc6 2.41 pthread cause pari to FTBFS

2025-03-07 Thread Bill Allombert
On Thu, Mar 06, 2025 at 07:17:25PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > It's what I was currently doing. I found that the issue is caused by this > upstream commit: > https://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=commit;h=89b53077d2a58f00e7debdfe58afabe953dac60d > > This is the corresponding bug that got fi

Bug#1099624: libc6 2.41 pthread cause pari to FTBFS

2025-03-06 Thread Bill Allombert
On Thu, Mar 06, 2025 at 07:02:25AM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > Hi Bill, > > On 2025-03-05 21:30, Bill Allombert wrote: > > Package: libc6 > > Version: 2.41-7 > > Severity: normal > > > > Hello Aurelien, > > > > During a test bui

Bug#1099624: libc6 2.41 pthread cause pari to FTBFS

2025-03-06 Thread Bill Allombert
On Thu, Mar 06, 2025 at 07:17:25PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > On 2025-03-06 19:03, Bill Allombert wrote: > > > > > > Do you have more details about that? I have tried to build pari locally, > > > and it builds fine. On which architecture is that? In which versi

Bug#1099624: libc6 2.41 pthread cause pari to FTBFS

2025-03-06 Thread Bill Allombert
On Thu, Mar 06, 2025 at 02:17:46PM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote: > On Thu, Mar 06, 2025 at 09:50:35AM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 06, 2025 at 07:02:25AM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > > > Hi Bill, > > > > > > On 2025-03-05 21:30, Bill All

Bug#1099624: libc6 2.41 pthread cause pari to FTBFS

2025-03-06 Thread Bill Allombert
On Thu, Mar 06, 2025 at 07:02:25AM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > Hi Bill, > > On 2025-03-05 21:30, Bill Allombert wrote: > > Package: libc6 > > Version: 2.41-7 > > Severity: normal > > > > Hello Aurelien, > > > > During a test bui

Bug#1099624: libc6 2.41 pthread cause pari to FTBFS

2025-03-11 Thread Bill Allombert
On Tue, Mar 11, 2025 at 09:12:15AM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote: > On Mon, Mar 10, 2025 at 11:49:39PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > > I also noticed it failed the same way on arm64. > > Thanks for confirming! > > > > > Please tell me if you would like me to do mor

Bug#1099624: libc6 2.41 pthread cause pari to FTBFS

2025-03-11 Thread Bill Allombert
On Mon, Mar 10, 2025 at 11:49:39PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > I also noticed it failed the same way on arm64. Thanks for confirming! > > > Please tell me if you would like me to do more experiments. > > > > If you have time, yes, that's very useful. I'll also try to have a > > closer look at

Bug#1099624: libc6 2.41 pthread cause pari to FTBFS

2025-03-11 Thread Bill Allombert
On Fri, Mar 07, 2025 at 11:45:10AM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote: > I am still unsure wether there is a race condition in PARI or not, however if > there is, it is clear that 2.41 makes the issue much worse. Hello Aurélien, I have made some progress. I have made a test program that does n

Bug#1099624: libc6 2.41 pthread cause pari to FTBFS

2025-03-11 Thread Bill Allombert
On Mon, Mar 10, 2025 at 12:24:43PM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote: > On Fri, Mar 07, 2025 at 11:45:10AM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote: > > I am still unsure wether there is a race condition in PARI or not, however > > if > > there is, it is clear that 2.41 makes the issue m

Bug#1099624: libc6 2.41 pthread cause pari to FTBFS

2025-03-11 Thread Bill Allombert
On Thu, Mar 06, 2025 at 09:50:35AM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote: > On Thu, Mar 06, 2025 at 07:02:25AM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > > Hi Bill, > > > > On 2025-03-05 21:30, Bill Allombert wrote: > > > Package: libc6 > > > Version: 2.41-7 > > &

Bug#1099624: libc6 2.41 pthread cause pari to FTBFS

2025-03-12 Thread Bill Allombert
On Tue, Mar 11, 2025 at 11:29:46PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > control: forwarded -1 https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32782 > > Hi Bill, > > > > I join a simplified test-case. > > Thanks, I have been able to simplify it a tiny bit more, please find it > attached. It's the versi

Bug#1099624: libc6 2.41 pthread cause pari to FTBFS

2025-03-05 Thread Bill Allombert
Package: libc6 Version: 2.41-7 Severity: normal Hello Aurelien, During a test build pari FTBFS due to a test-suite failure in a test involving pthread. this failure is only reproducible with libc6 2.41. So I wonder if this is linked to the fix for 986724. pari uses condition variables. Of cou

Bug#1099624: libc6 2.41 pthread cause pari to FTBFS

2025-03-13 Thread Bill Allombert
On Mon, Mar 10, 2025 at 03:18:07PM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote: > In that spirit, please find a third one, which fail with both libc, > but in a different way. > > About 10% of the time, it hangs in 'exit' after all threads have terminated. (This is an aside to this bug re