package libc6-dev
severity 321263 serious
reassign 321263 linux-kernel-headers 2.6.13+0rc3-1
merge 321263 320515
thanks
On Thursday, August 04, 2005 3:15 PM, Bill Currie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: libc6-dev
> Version: 2.3.2.ds1-22
> Severity: normal
> Tags: patch
>
>
> /usr/include/li
On Wednesday, August 17, 2005 3:59 AM, GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> At Mon, 23 May 2005 23:28:01 +0300,
> Lars Wirzenius wrote:
>> The English output of "localedef --help" contains this:
>>
>> --posixBe strictly POSIX conform
>>
>> The last word should surely be
reassign 330701 libpam-modules
close 330701 0.79-2
merge 330701 330458
thanks
Hi,
On Thursday, September 29, 2005 12:47 PM, Luca Capello <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
[...]
> I don't know exactly since when (I upgrade my Debian unstable every
> morning and anyway since no more than a week), but now
Hi,
On Thursday, September 29, 2005 3:36 PM, Michael Setzer
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> This means that you have to add something like
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> to your /etc/security/pam_env.conf and everything should work again as
> usual.
That's a workaround, not a solution. The correct
reassign 330897 libpam-modules
close 330897 0.79-2
merge 330897 330458
thanks
Hi,
On Friday, September 30, 2005 11:52 AM, Calum Mackay
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: locales
> Version: 2.3.5-6
> Severity: normal
>
> Something odd seems to have happened to my locales, today. Although I
> d
On Thu, 2010-11-18 at 15:31 +0100, Jan Rasche wrote:
> tzdata tries to execute stuff under /tmp during install. As lot of people
> used to mount /tmp
> noexec for security reasons this will raise errors.
tzdata does no such thing. The "culprit" is clearly visible:
[...]
> Can't exec "/tmp/tzda
On Tue, 2011-01-11 at 21:35 +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> I would like to make an upload of eglibc to address DSA-2122-2 (the
> first round of patches for the $ORIGIN/LD_AUDIT issue does not cover
> all corner cases, unfortunately).
[...]
> Should I push this through testing-security, testing-prop
user release.debian@packages.debian.org
usertag 611411 + squeeze-can-defer
tag 611411 + squeeze-ignore
thanks
On Sat, 2011-01-29 at 01:08 +0100, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> glibc-doc-reference FTBFS in a clean squeeze chroot. Tail of the build
> log:
>
> | texi2dvi --pdf libc.texinfo
> | make[1]: **
tag 611629 + moreinfo
thanks
On Mon, January 31, 2011 12:46, Teodor wrote:
> An almost up-to-date system upgraded last week cannot be upgraded today
> due to
> libc6 configuration errors:
Looking at the log, it doesn't appear the errors are actually due to
libc6, however. This section suggests a
On Fri, 2011-03-11 at 16:54 -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Mar 2011, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
> > On Fri Mar 11, 2011 at 13:11:52 -0600, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> > > Chile was supposed to leave the Summer daylight savings period this
> > > coming weekend, but it was pushed to A
On Fri, 2011-03-11 at 13:54 -0600, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> Martin Zobel-Helas dijo [Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 08:31:36PM +0100]:
> > > Chile was supposed to leave the Summer daylight savings period this
> > > coming weekend, but it was pushed to April 2nd. The fixes have been
> > > accepted to the package
On Fri, 2011-03-11 at 20:07 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Assuming everything goes according to plan (adding packages to
> squeeze-updates hasn't actually been tested yet) I'm planning on pushing
> the tzdata update in tomorrow morning.
Unfortunately, that didn't happen
On Sat, 2011-03-12 at 12:09 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-03-11 at 20:07 +0000, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > Assuming everything goes according to plan (adding packages to
> > squeeze-updates hasn't actually been tested yet) I'm planning on pushing
> >
On Wed, 2011-03-23 at 19:31 +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 01:26:41PM +0100, Philipp Kern wrote:
> > we just received the following request for 2011d in lenny-volatile and
> > squeeze-updates. Could you prepare the uploads?
>
> I should have a bit of time tonight to work o
On Sat, 2011-06-11 at 21:27 +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 07:12:57PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
> > Aurelien,
> >
> > On Sun, Jun 05, 2011 at 12:23:51PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > > I am therefore thinking about uploading the next upstream stable version
> > > (2.11.
On Sat, 2011-08-13 at 14:47 +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 10:48:51AM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
[...]
> > Thanks. From what I've seen, I'd be interested in seeing the fixes
> > applied to p-u.
> >
> > Given the timescales of t
On Mon, 2011-08-29 at 23:30 +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 04:30:41PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > On Sat, 2011-08-13 at 14:47 +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 10:48:51AM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > > &g
On Mon, 2011-09-12 at 20:27 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 22:53:15 +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
>
> > The status is that glibc 2.11.4 will be released when Debian feels it
> > is ready, as we are the main testers here. I am planning to do some more
> > testing of the curre
On Fri, 2011-09-02 at 17:23 +0400, Eugene Barbashin wrote:
> > I don't think there is a real need to push to to -updates. Nobody
> > requested about this changes in lenny or squeeze, so I guess they are
> > not that important.
> It's very important update for everyone using debian in Russia, so
> p
On Wed, 2011-09-14 at 16:40 +0200, Youssef Eldakar wrote:
> On 01/-10/-28163 09:59 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > On Fri, 2011-09-02 at 17:23 +0400, Eugene Barbashin wrote:
[Russian law changes on October 30th]
> > For the record, after some discussion with the maintainers on IRC
On Sun, 2011-09-18 at 23:52 +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> On my side can only confirm that upgrading from 2011d to 2011h indeed
> changes the Egyptian timezone. So maybe we can simply push it to
> proposed-updates.
Assuming squeeze-updates, I'll have a look at that in the next day or
so.
> Anyw
On Sat, 2011-09-24 at 11:45 +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 07:06:27PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > On Sun, 2011-09-18 at 23:52 +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > > On my side can only confirm that upgrading from 2011d to 2011h indeed
> > > ch
On Mon, 17 Oct 2011 22:17:48 +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
Due to change in one of the Brazilian timezone last week-end, I have
uploaded version 2011l-0squeeze1 of tzdata to
stable-proposed-updates.
For the record, I pushed this via squeeze-updates overnight (see
SUA17-1).
Technically only
On Wed, 2011-10-19 at 09:04 +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 07:49:50AM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > On Mon, 17 Oct 2011 22:17:48 +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > >Due to change in one of the Brazilian timezone last week-end, I have
> > >uploa
On Tue, 2011-10-25 at 05:39 +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> I have just uploaded tzdata 2011m to both lenny-volatile and squeeze.
Thanks. fwiw, it's also transitioned to testing. (although I'm not
convinced that it justified "urgency=critical", with four days before
the new changes take effect :P
On Tue, 2011-10-25 at 21:27 +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 07:22:37PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > On Tue, 2011-10-25 at 05:39 +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > > I have just uploaded tzdata 2011m to both lenny-volatile and squeeze.
[...]
> > I
On Tue, 25 Oct 2011 21:22:57 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Tue, 2011-10-25 at 21:27 +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 07:22:37PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-10-25 at 05:39 +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > I have just uploaded tzdata 2011m to b
On Sat, 2011-09-10 at 22:53 +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> The status is that glibc 2.11.4 will be released when Debian feels it
> is ready, as we are the main testers here. I am planning to do some more
> testing of the current SVN on more machines, and everything seems fine
> around the release o
On Tue, 2011-11-01 at 00:10 +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> As part of the weekly tzdata upload (well I hope things will slow down
> soon), I have just uploaded tzdata 2011n to both lenny-volatile and
> squeeze. It includes DST fixes for:
> - Cuba.
> - Fidji.
> - Pridnestrovian Moldavian Repu
On Sun, 2011-10-30 at 19:27 +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 05:36:27PM +0000, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > Did the 2.11.4 release happen? I'm conscious of the fact that we're now
> > a little way past 6.0.3; apologies for not following up again soon
On Tue, 2011-12-13 at 17:55 +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> I have attached a new version of what we plan to upload. It includes a
> few more fixes backported from the unstable version (look at the end of
> the changelog), and also a few more fixes from upstream (no new stable
> version have been r
On Wed, 2011-12-14 at 07:54 +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 06:41:54PM +0000, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > On Tue, 2011-12-13 at 17:55 +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > > Would it be possible to upload this, and do a call for test for people
> > > wa
On Sat, 2011-12-17 at 12:36 +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> As you pointed me on IRC, the build failed on arm, mips and mipsel. It's
> due to a file out of sync between the main repository and the ports
> repository hosting theses architectures. I have backported the missing
> change to version 2.11
On Thu, 2008-06-26 at 12:51 +0300, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
> reassign 312314 glibc
> thanks
>
> On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 9:40 AM, Aurelien Jarno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Bug#312314: w3m: "Absurd stack bottom value" error on a Grsecurity
> >> hardened system
> >> Bug reassigned from packag
On Thu, 2008-06-26 at 20:00 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
[...]
> As the maintainer to whom the bug was reported, it's your responsibility
> to ensure that the bug is reassigned to the correct package if so
> required.
I've just re-read the report and realised that you were the
Hi,
The next point release for "wheezy" (7.6) is scheduled for Saturday,
July 12th. Stable NEW will be frozen during the preceding weekend.
As usual, base-files can be uploaded at any point before the freeze.
Regards,
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-glibc-requ...@lists.debian.org
wi
Hi,
The next (and final) point release for "squeeze" (6.0.10) is scheduled
for Saturday, July 19th. Oldstable NEW will be frozen during the
preceding weekend.
As usual, base-files can be uploaded at any point before the freeze.
Regards,
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-glibc-requ...@
Hi,
The next point release for "wheezy" (7.7) is scheduled for Saturday,
October 18th. Stable NEW will be frozen during the preceding weekend.
Regards,
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-glibc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.de
Hi,
The next point release for "wheezy" (7.8) is scheduled for Saturday,
January 10th. Stable NEW will be frozen during the preceding weekend.
Regards,
Adam
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Hi,
The first point release for "jessie" (8.1) is scheduled for Saturday,
June 6th. Stable NEW will be frozen during the preceding weekend.
Regards,
Adam
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Hi,
The next point release for "jessie" (8.2) is scheduled for Saturday,
September 5th. Processing of new uploads into jessie-proposed-updates
will be frozen during the preceding weekend.
Regards,
Adam
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Hi,
The next point release for "wheezy" (7.9) is scheduled for Saturday,
September 5th. Processing of new uploads into wheezy-proposed-updates
will be frozen during the preceding weekend.
Regards,
Adam
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Hi,
The next point release for "jessie" (8.3) is scheduled for Saturday,
January 23rd. Processing of new uploads into jessie-proposed-updates
will be frozen during the preceding weekend.
Regards,
Adam
Hi,
On Mon, 2009-10-12 at 11:10 +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> Would it be possible to do a stable upload to fix this problem (see
> below)?
>From the bug log I'd say this should indeed be fixed in stable. Please
could you supply the proposed debdiff for confirmation?
Thanks,
Adam
--
To U
On Fri, 2009-10-16 at 16:19 +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> Adam D. Barratt a écrit :
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Mon, 2009-10-12 at 11:10 +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> >> Would it be possible to do a stable upload to fix this problem (see
> >> below)?
> >
&g
tag 658424 + confirmed squeeze
thanks
On Tue, 2012-02-07 at 22:48 +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 07, 2012 at 09:45:12PM +0000, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > On Thu, 2012-02-02 at 23:11 +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > > eglibc 2.11.3-2 shipped in Debian Squeeze 6.
tag 658424 + pending
thanks
On Sun, 2012-02-12 at 20:38 +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 11:09:49AM +0000, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > That's unfortunate, but I'm not sure we should let it block getting the
> > fix to stable users any further. Please
On Tue, 2012-02-14 at 12:54 +0100, Bernhard R. Link wrote:
> * Adam D. Barratt [120212 22:06]:
> > As I mentioned previously: Bernhard, "JBK" (and anyone else affected and
> > watching the bugs) - once the package is available for your architecture
> > via proposed-
On Sat, 2012-02-25 at 12:20 +, Robert Millan wrote:
> 660403: cdparanoia: FTFBS on kfreebsd-*
> -> Unless there's further activity I recommend removing of kfreebsd-*
> binaries from testing. See
> http://bugs.debian.org./cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=660403#12
That doesn't work. The choices would
reassign 669858 src:eglibc
tags 669858 + wheezy sid
found 669858 2.13-30
thanks
On Sat, 2012-04-21 at 13:07 +0100, peter green wrote:
> Package: eglibc
> Severity: serious
Thanks for filing this and other FTBFS reports recently. A couple of
comments / requests:
Please include version informatio
On 19.10.2012 15:43, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
I have uploaded a new version of tzdata to both wheezy (2012g-1) and
squeeze (2012g-0squeeze1). This upload has been triggered by a DST
change this week-end in some parts of Brazil (see bug#690606), but I
have realized at the same occasion that both sque
On Fri, 2012-10-19 at 19:04 +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 05:06:15PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > On 19.10.2012 15:43, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > >I have uploaded a new version of tzdata to both wheezy (2012g-1) and
> > >squeeze (2012g-0sque
On Thu, 2013-09-26 at 12:31 -0500, Matthew P Zagrabelny wrote:
> It looks like tzdata was updated in wheezy/updates from 2013c-0wheezy1
> to 2013d-0wheezy1. This looks to break tzdata-java:
(Small but important point - you mean wheezy-updates; wheezy/updates
would be part of a security.d.o path.)
Hi,
Apologies for the delay in getting back to you about this.
On Fri, 2013-06-21 at 14:15 +0200, Petr Salinger wrote:
> One more problem popped up - #712196
>
> The fix is one-liner:
>
> --- kfreebsd/syscalls.list
> +++ kfreebsd/syscalls.list
> -sys_ktimer_settime - ktimer_settime
On 2013-10-02 16:14, Adam Conrad wrote:
On Tue, Oct 01, 2013 at 10:23:22PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
That looks okay. In terms of the other suggested updates, as a
non-release architecture for wheezy, hurd-specific patches aren't
really
appropriate for a stable update.
Perhap
On Tue, 2014-01-21 at 19:00 +0100, intrigeri wrote:
> Julien Cristau wrote (04 Dec 2013 14:00:10 GMT) :
> > On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 16:44:41 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
[...]
> >> If someone puts together a debdiff including them, I'm more than
> >> happy to loo
On Tue, 2014-01-21 at 12:23 -0700, Adam Conrad wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 06:52:31PM +0000, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> >
> > I suspect all of the changes made it in to the 2.13-38+deb7u1 upload,
> > but confirmation of that would be appreciated.
>
> Yeah, I&#x
Hi,
The next point release for "wheezy" (7.4) is scheduled for Saturday
February 8th. Stable NEW will be frozen during the preceding weekend.
As usual, base-files can be uploaded at any point before the freeze.
Regards,
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-glibc-requ...@lists.debian.org
Hi,
The next point release for "squeeze" (6.0.9) is scheduled for Saturday
February 15th. Stable NEW will be frozen during the preceding weekend.
As usual, base-files can be uploaded at any point before the freeze.
Regards,
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-glibc-requ...@lists.debian
Hi,
The next point release for "wheezy" (7.5) is scheduled for Saturday,
April 26th. Stable NEW will be frozen during the preceding weekend.
As usual, base-files can be uploaded at any point before the freeze.
Regards,
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-glibc-requ...@lists.debian.org
w
Hi,
The next point release for "wheezy" (7.10) is scheduled for Saturday,
April 2nd. Processing of new uploads into wheezy-proposed-updates will
be frozen during the preceding weekend.
Regards,
Adam
Hi,
The next point release for "jessie" (8.4) is scheduled for Saturday,
April 2nd. Processing of new uploads into jessie-proposed-updates
will be frozen during the preceding weekend.
Regards,
Adam
Hi,
The next point release for "jessie" (8.6) is scheduled for Saturday,
September 17th. Processing of new uploads into jessie-proposed-updates
will be frozen during the preceding weekend.
Regards,
Adam
On Sat, 2016-11-26 at 01:02 -0600, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> The following packages have unmet dependencies:
> cli-common : Depends: perl but it is not going to be installed
> libc6 : Breaks: libc6:i386 (!= 2.24-7) but 2.24-5 is to be installed
> libc6:i386 : Breaks: libc6 (!= 2.24-5) but 2.24-7
Hi,
The next point release for "jessie" (8.7) is scheduled for Saturday,
January 14th. Processing of new uploads into jessie-proposed-updates
will be frozen during the preceding weekend.
Regards,
Adam
Hi,
The next point release for "jessie" (8.8) is scheduled for Saturday, May
6th. Processing of new uploads into jessie-proposed-updates will be
frozen during the preceding weekend.
Regards,
Adam
Hi,
The next point release for "jessie" (8.9) is scheduled for Saturday,
July 22nd. Processing of new uploads into jessie-proposed-updates will
be frozen during the preceding weekend.
Regards,
Adam
Hi,
The first point release for "stretch" (9.1) is scheduled for Saturday,
July 22nd. Processing of new uploads into stretch-proposed-updates will
be frozen during the preceding weekend.
Regards,
Adam
Hi,
The next point release for "stretch" (9.3) is scheduled for Saturday,
December 9th. Processing of new uploads into stretch-proposed-updates
will be frozen during the preceding weekend.
Regards,
Adam
Hi,
The next point release for "jessie" (8.10) is scheduled for Saturday,
December 9th. Processing of new uploads into jessie-proposed-updates
will be frozen during the preceding weekend.
Regards,
Adam
Hi,
The next point release for "buster" (10.10) is scheduled for Saturday
June 19th. Processing of new uploads into buster-proposed-updates will
be frozen during the preceding weekend.
Regards,
Adam
Hi,
The next point release for "buster" (10.11) is scheduled for Saturday,
October 9th. Processing of new uploads into buster-proposed-updates
will be frozen during the preceding weekend.
Regards,
Adam
Hi,
The first point release for "bullseye" (11.1) is scheduled for
Saturday, October 9th. Processing of new uploads into bullseye-
proposed-updates will be frozen during the preceding weekend.
Regards,
Adam
Hi,
The next point release for "bullseye" (11.2) is scheduled for Saturday,
December 18th. Processing of new uploads into bullseye-proposed-updates
will be frozen during the preceding weekend.
Regards,
Adam
Hi,
The next point release for "bullseye" (11.3) is scheduled for Saturday,
March 26th. Processing of new uploads into bullseye-proposed-updates
will be frozen during the preceding weekend.
Regards,
Adam
Hi,
The next point release for "buster" (10.12) is scheduled for Saturday,
March 26th. Processing of new uploads into buster-proposed-updates will
be frozen during the preceding weekend.
Regards,
Adam
Hi,
The next point release for "bullseye" (11.4) is scheduled for Saturday,
July 9th. Processing of new uploads into bullseye-proposed-updates will
be frozen during the preceding weekend.
Regards,
Adam
Hi,
The next point release for "bullseye" (11.5) is scheduled for Saturday,
September 10th. Processing of new uploads into bullseye-proposed-
updates will be frozen during the preceding weekend.
Regards,
Adam
Hi,
The next - and final - point release for "buster" (10.13) is scheduled
for Saturday, September 10th. Processing of new uploads into buster-
proposed-updates will be frozen during the weekend of August 27th.
Regards,
Adam
Hi,
The next point release for "bullseye" (11.6) is scheduled for Saturday,
December 17th. Processing of new uploads into bullseye-proposed-updates
will be frozen during the preceding weekend.
Regards,
Adam
Hi,
The next point release for "bullseye" (11.7) is scheduled for Saturday,
April 29th. Processing of new uploads into bullseye-proposed-updates
will be frozen during the preceding weekend.
Regards,
Adam
Hi,
The next point release for "bookworm" (12.3) is scheduled for Saturday,
December 9th. Processing of new uploads into bookworm-proposed-updates
will be frozen during the preceding weekend.
Regards,
Adam
Hi,
The next point release for "bookworm" (12.5) is scheduled for Saturday,
February 10th. Processing of new uploads into bookworm-proposed-updates
will be frozen during the preceding weekend.
Regards,
Adam
Hi,
The next point release for "bullseye" (11.9) is scheduled for Saturday,
February 10th. Processing of new uploads into bullseye-proposed-updates
will be frozen during the preceding weekend.
Regards,
Adam
On Fri, 2024-02-16 at 17:35 +, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> The next point release for "bookworm" (12.6) is scheduled for
> Saturday, April 6th. Processing of new uploads into bookworm-
> proposed-updates will be frozen during the preceeding weekend.
Due to recent events, the point release has
On Mon, 2024-05-06 at 13:02 +0200, Jan Krčmář wrote:
> Package: libc6
> Version: 2.28-10+deb10u3
>
> Upgrading the system (Debian 10/Buster) causes corrupted system,
> ending with kernel panic and unbootable system.
>
[...]
> The following packages will be upgraded:
> apt apt-transport-https apt-
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
On Wed, 2024-05-15 at 22:10 +1000, Joris van der Geer wrote:
> package:libc6-dev
> version: 2.36
There's no such version of the package. However, assuming you mean the
package in bookworm (2.36-9+deb12u5),
> Libc6 omits thr ‘bits’ directory, rendering glibc inoperable
On Mon, 2024-07-15 at 15:53 +0200, Michal Heppler wrote:
> I noticed that thew `date -d ...` utility converts time between EST
> and CEST timezone in wrong way. The time is shifted by 1 hour later:
>
> # cat /etc/timezone
> Europe/Prague
> # date -d '7:00AM EST'
> Po 15. července 2024, 14:00:00 CE
Control: tags -1 + confirmed d-i
On Wed, 2017-11-22 at 18:02 +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> On 2017-11-19 18:36, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
[...]
> > I would like to upload a new glibc package for the next stretch
> > release.
> > It mostly consists in pulling the release/2.24/master upstream
> > branc
Control: tags -1 + pending
On Fri, 2017-12-01 at 21:15 +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> On 2017-12-01 19:49, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > Adam D. Barratt (2017-11-24):
> > > This looks OK to me, but will need a KiBi-ack; CCing.
> >
> > lgtm; apologies for the d
Control: tags -1 + pending
On Sun, 2018-01-14 at 11:52 +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> On 2018-01-13 17:26, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > Control: tag -1 confirmed
> >
> > On Sat, Dec 9, 2017 at 14:22:45 +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> >
> > > Unfortunately it didn't make in 9.3 due to the regression
Hi,
The next point release for "stretch" (9.4) is scheduled for Saturday,
March 10th. Processing of new uploads into stretch-proposed-updates
will be frozen during the preceding weekend.
Regards,
Adam
Hi,
The next point release for "stretch" (9.5) is scheduled for Saturday,
July 14th. Processing of new uploads into stretch-proposed-updates will
be frozen during the preceding weekend.
Regards,
Adam
On Fri, 2018-06-29 at 10:20 +0100, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
[...]
> debian-riscv has been repeatedly asking for a single zero-impact
> line
> to be included in *one* file in *one* dpkg-related package which
> would
> allow riscv to stop being a NMU architecture and become part of
> debi
On Fri, 2018-06-29 at 11:44 +0100, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
[...]
> On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 10:35 AM, Adam D. Barratt
> wrote:
>
> > > what is the reason why that package is not moving forward?
> >
> > I assume you're referring to the dpkg upl
Hi,
The next point release for "stretch" (9.6) is scheduled for Saturday,
November 10th. Processing of new uploads into stretch-proposed-updates
will be frozen during the preceding weekend.
Regards,
Adam
Hi,
The next point release for "stretch" (9.8) is scheduled for Saturday,
February 16th. Processing of new uploads into stretch-proposed-updates
will be frozen during the preceding weekend.
Regards,
Adam
Hi,
The next point release for "stretch" (9.9) is scheduled for Saturday,
April 27th. Processing of new uploads into stretch-proposed-updates
will be frozen during the preceding weekend.
Regards,
Adam
Hi,
The next point release for "stretch" (9.10) is scheduled for Saturday,
September 7th. Processing of new uploads into stretch-proposed-updates
will be frozen during the preceding weekend.
Regards,
Adam
Hi,
The first point release for "buster" (10.1) is scheduled for Saturday,
September 7th. Processing of new uploads into buster-proposed-updates
will be frozen during the preceding weekend.
Regards,
Adam
1 - 100 of 114 matches
Mail list logo
