Processed (with 1 error): Re: [Pkg-zfsonlinux-devel] Bug#595790: hostid: useless unless fixed

2016-09-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > reassign -1 libc6 Bug #595790 [coreutils] hostid: useless unless fixed Bug reassigned from package 'coreutils' to 'libc6'. No longer marked as found in versions coreutils/8.5-1. Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #595790 to the same values previously se

Processed: Re: Bug#595790: hostid: useless unless fixed

2016-09-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 595790 The value from gethostid() should be more unique and not > change when the host IP changes Bug #595790 [libc6] hostid: useless unless fixed Changed Bug title to 'The value from gethostid() should be more unique and not change when

Bug#595790: [Pkg-zfsonlinux-devel] Bug#595790: hostid: useless unless fixed

2016-09-28 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
Control: reassign -1 libc6 Control: found -1 2.19-18 Control: The value from gethostid() should be more unique and not change when the host IP changes Reassigning to glibc as that is the source of gethostid() where the problem with the missing unique identifier originates. Using the version numb

Bug#838913: libc6: There's probably a bug in libpthread, affecting several user programs.

2016-09-28 Thread Fernando Santagata
On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 06:24:20PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > On 2016-09-27 16:00, Florian Weimer wrote: > Ok. I have seen this change in 4.7.5: > > | commit bec4e55b55867ed948a3afd9f9ccf3506bfdad24 > | Author: Michal Hocko > | Date: Thu Sep 1 16:14:41 2016 -0700 > | > | mm, oom: preven

Bug#595790: [Pkg-zfsonlinux-devel] Bug#595790: hostid: useless unless fixed

2016-09-28 Thread Florian Weimer
* Petter Reinholdtsen: > Something like this should work, I guess: > > if [ ! -f /etc/hostid ]; then >if [ -e /sys/class/dmi/id/product_uuid ]; then >sethostidfromuuid $(cat /sys/class/dmi/id/product_uuid) >else > dd if=/dev/urandom bs=1 count=4 of=/etc/hostid 2>/dev/null >

Bug#595790: [Pkg-zfsonlinux-devel] Bug#595790: hostid: useless unless fixed

2016-09-28 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
[Florian Weimer] > That's not very different from /etc/machine-id, isn't it? Ah, thank you very much for bringing this systemd setting to my attention. I was not aware of it. I agree that it seem very similar in purpose and implementation. Will it be available on non-linux Debian architectures

segfault in errx

2016-09-28 Thread Michael Meskes
Hi, I recently learned that ul (from bsdmainutils) segfaults when run against the attached file. Some debugging shows that the segfault happens when cleaning up in errx(): michael@feivel:~$ ul ul.segf ul: unknown escape sequence in input: 33, 135 Speicherzugriffsfehler "Speicherzugriffsfehler"

Bug#595790: [Pkg-zfsonlinux-devel] Bug#595790: hostid: useless unless fixed

2016-09-28 Thread Michael Stone
On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 12:32:04PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: * Petter Reinholdtsen: Something like this should work, I guess: if [ ! -f /etc/hostid ]; then if [ -e /sys/class/dmi/id/product_uuid ]; then sethostidfromuuid $(cat /sys/class/dmi/id/product_uuid) else dd if=/

Bug#595790: [Pkg-zfsonlinux-devel] Bug#595790: hostid: useless unless fixed

2016-09-28 Thread Florian Weimer
* Petter Reinholdtsen: > [Florian Weimer] >> That's not very different from /etc/machine-id, isn't it? > > Ah, thank you very much for bringing this systemd setting to my > attention. I was not aware of it. > > I agree that it seem very similar in purpose and implementation. Will > it be availab

Re: segfault in errx

2016-09-28 Thread Florian Weimer
* Michael Meskes: > I recently learned that ul (from bsdmainutils) segfaults when run > against the attached file. Some debugging shows that the segfault > happens when cleaning up in errx(): > > michael@feivel:~$ ul ul.segf > ul: unknown escape sequence in input: 33, 135 > Speicherzugriffsfehler

Re: segfault in errx

2016-09-28 Thread Florian Weimer
* Florian Weimer: > * Michael Meskes: > >> I recently learned that ul (from bsdmainutils) segfaults when run >> against the attached file. Some debugging shows that the segfault >> happens when cleaning up in errx(): >> >> michael@feivel:~$ ul ul.segf >> ul: unknown escape sequence in input: 33,

Re: segfault in errx

2016-09-28 Thread Michael Meskes
On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 02:36:49PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: > What's the glibc version and architecture? Oops, sorry, up-to-date unstable on amd64. Michael -- Michael Meskes Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De, Michael at Meskes dot (De|Com|Net|Org) Meskes at (Debian|Postgresql) dot Org Jabber: mic

Re: segfault in errx

2016-09-28 Thread Florian Weimer
* Florian Weimer: >> I can reproduce something like this with 2.24-3 on amd64. valgrind >> isn't very helpful. > > And it needs a UTF-8 locale (C.UTF-8 will do). Another multi-byte > locale may work as well. Bisecting this with the attached script leads to: commit 18d26750dd8fd328a78cf639fd0ec

Processed: unarchiving 821358, found 821358 in 2.19-18+deb8u6

2016-09-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > unarchive 821358 Bug #821358 {Done: Aurelien Jarno } [libc6] nss_hesiod segfaults in sock_eq Unarchived Bug 821358 > found 821358 2.19-18+deb8u6 Bug #821358 {Done: Aurelien Jarno } [libc6] nss_hesiod segfaults in sock_eq Marked as found in versi

Processed: Re: Bug#821358: nss_hesiod segfaults in sock_eq

2016-09-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > reopen -1 Bug #821358 {Done: Aurelien Jarno } [libc6] nss_hesiod segfaults in sock_eq 'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version; all fixed versions will be cleared, and you may need to re-add them. Bug reopened No longer marked as fixed

Bug#821358: nss_hesiod segfaults in sock_eq

2016-09-28 Thread Anders Kaseorg
Control: reopen -1 Control: found -1 2.19-18+deb8u6 Control: tags -1 + jessie On Sun, 17 Apr 2016, Anders Kaseorg wrote: > glibc 2.22 broke nss_hesiod so that it segfaults on almost all uses. To > reproduce: > > # sed -i 's/^passwd:.*/& hesiod/' /etc/nsswitch.conf > # cat > /etc/hesiod.conf < l

Processed: fixed 821358 in 2.22-8

2016-09-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > fixed 821358 2.22-8 Bug #821358 [libc6] nss_hesiod segfaults in sock_eq Marked as fixed in versions glibc/2.22-8. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 821358: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cg

Bug#818281: marked as pending

2016-09-28 Thread Anders Kaseorg
On Mon, 15 Aug 2016, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > + * debian/patches/any/submitted-resolv-ipv6-nameservers.diff: replace by > +patch cvs-resolv-ipv6-nameservers.diff taken from upstream. This fixes > +mtr on systems using only IPv6 nameservers. Closes: #818281. This is the commit that introdu

Bug#595790: [Pkg-zfsonlinux-devel] Bug#595790: hostid: useless unless fixed

2016-09-28 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
[Michael Stone] > Other platforms have deprecated gethostid, that's the best way forward for > linux, IMO. Which platforms is this? I find FreeBSD recommend to use sysctl and KERN_HOSTID to get the hostid integer directly from the kernel instead of using gethostid(), which isn't really depricati

Bug#595790: [Pkg-zfsonlinux-devel] Bug#595790: hostid: useless unless fixed

2016-09-28 Thread Michael Stone
On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 11:11:21PM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: [Michael Stone] Other platforms have deprecated gethostid, that's the best way forward for linux, IMO. Which platforms is this? I find FreeBSD recommend to use sysctl and KERN_HOSTID to get the hostid integer directly from t

Bug#595790: [Pkg-zfsonlinux-devel] Bug#595790: hostid: useless unless fixed

2016-09-28 Thread Aurelien Jarno
On 2016-09-28 09:33, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > Control: reassign -1 libc6 > Control: found -1 2.19-18 > Control: The value from gethostid() should be more unique and not change when > the host IP changes > > Reassigning to glibc as that is the source of gethostid() where the > problem with the

Bug#595790: [Pkg-zfsonlinux-devel] Bug#595790: hostid: useless unless fixed

2016-09-28 Thread Michael Stone
On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 12:30:39AM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: Another question is about chroots. The above methods means we might end-up with the same machine-id in chroots id the DMI UUID is available. Is it something really wanted? One of the many ambiguities of gethostid. :) Is it a unique

Bug#595790: [Pkg-zfsonlinux-devel] Bug#595790: hostid: useless unless fixed

2016-09-28 Thread Florian Weimer
* Michael Stone: > Other platforms have deprecated gethostid, that's the best way forward > for linux, IMO. I agree. It's the most likely outcome if this issue was reported to glibc upstream.

Processed: Re: Bug#821358: nss_hesiod segfaults in sock_eq

2016-09-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > severity -1 serious Bug #821358 [libc6] nss_hesiod segfaults in sock_eq Severity set to 'serious' from 'important' -- 821358: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=821358 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#821358: nss_hesiod segfaults in sock_eq

2016-09-28 Thread Anders Kaseorg
Control: severity -1 serious Bumping severity because this is a regression introduced in a stable update. Anders

Bug#595790: [Pkg-zfsonlinux-devel] Bug#595790: hostid: useless unless fixed

2016-09-28 Thread Richard Laager
On 09/28/2016 04:41 AM, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > I did not quite understand what you mean here. Do you mean the DMI > value in your experience isn't unique? Absolutely, yes. I found this out because, for some reason that I don't know, libvirtd wants a unique identifier. It defaults to looking

Bug#595790: [Pkg-zfsonlinux-devel] Bug#595790: hostid: useless unless fixed

2016-09-28 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
[Aurelien Jarno] > In any case it looks to me we should not reinvent the wheel. We > already ended-up with two implementations of a unique machine ID, one > in dbus and one for systemd (which fortunately now try to just copy > the other one if it already exists), I am not sure we want a third > one