Bug#826154: libc6-dev: sys/wait.h does not include sys/resource.h

2016-06-03 Thread Aurelien Jarno
control: tag -1 + moreinfo On 2016-06-02 14:55, Benjamin Moody wrote: > Package: libc6-dev > Version: 2.19-18+deb8u4 > Severity: normal > > Dear Maintainer, > > In previous versions of glibc (such as the version used in Debian > wheezy), would include . It now does not > do so. This breaks ex

Processed: Re: Bug#826154: libc6-dev: sys/wait.h does not include sys/resource.h

2016-06-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 + moreinfo Bug #826154 [libc6-dev] libc6-dev: sys/wait.h does not include sys/resource.h Added tag(s) moreinfo. -- 826154: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=826154 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#825865: glibc: Testsuite failure on sparc64 due to unaligned access in wcsmbs/test-wcsncmp.c

2016-06-03 Thread Aurelien Jarno
On 2016-05-31 17:21, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > On 2016-05-31 16:23, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > > (Sorry for the confusion, I accidentally used my company email. Please > > answer to this address). > > > > Hi Aurelien! > > > > On 05/31/2016 04:13 PM, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > > >> --

Bug#825865: glibc: Testsuite failure on sparc64 due to unaligned access in wcsmbs/test-wcsncmp.c

2016-06-03 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
Hi! On 06/03/2016 02:26 PM, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > FAIL: rt/tst-shm > original exit status 1 > > It's very likely that /dev/shm (or /run/shm) is not mounted correctly in > the chroot. Hmm, that's odd. I have just verified this again: root@landau:~# schroot -c sid1-sparc64-sbuild (sid1-sparc64-

Bug#825865: glibc: Testsuite failure on sparc64 due to unaligned access in wcsmbs/test-wcsncmp.c

2016-06-03 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
On 06/03/2016 02:38 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > I will verify the configuration again. Ok, so there was indeed one strange issue which was that /dev/shm in the host system was mounted again when invoking any schroot command, so that after running schroot once, mount on the host system s

Bug#826256: locales: wrong width for hexagrams (and possibly others) in 2.22

2016-06-03 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Package: locales Version: 2.22-0experimental0 Severity: normal Tags: upstream Starting with locales 2.22-0experimental0, some chars have the wrong width; downgrading locales to 2.21-9 fixes the bugs. Test program: tglase@tglase:~ $ cat x.c #define _XOPEN_SOURCE #include #include #include #de

Processed: your mail

2016-06-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > found 826256 2.22-10 Bug #826256 [locales] locales: wrong width for hexagrams (and possibly others) in 2.22 Marked as found in versions glibc/2.22-10. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 826256: http:

Processed: your mail

2016-06-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > notfound 826256 2.21-9 Bug #826256 [locales] locales: wrong width for hexagrams (and possibly others) in 2.22 Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #826256 to the same values previously set > thanks Stopping processing here. Please co

Bug#826256: locales: wrong width for hexagrams (and possibly others) in 2.22

2016-06-03 Thread Aurelien Jarno
control: tag -1 + moreinfo On 2016-06-03 19:29, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > Package: locales > Version: 2.22-0experimental0 > Severity: normal > Tags: upstream > > Starting with locales 2.22-0experimental0, some chars have the wrong > width; downgrading locales to 2.21-9 fixes the bugs. > > Test pr

Processed: Re: Bug#826256: locales: wrong width for hexagrams (and possibly others) in 2.22

2016-06-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 + moreinfo Bug #826256 [locales] locales: wrong width for hexagrams (and possibly others) in 2.22 Added tag(s) moreinfo. -- 826256: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=826256 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problem

Processed: Re: Bug#826256: locales: wrong width for hexagrams (and possibly others) in 2.22

2016-06-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 + moreinfo Bug #826256 [locales] locales: wrong width for hexagrams (and possibly others) in 2.22 Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #826256 to the same tags previously set -- 826256: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=826256 Debian Bug Tra

Bug#826256: locales: wrong width for hexagrams (and possibly others) in 2.22

2016-06-03 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Aurelien Jarno dixit: >EastAsian.txt explicitly lists the hexagrams as neutral width, so I don't Yes it does, but neutral does NOT always mean 1. I even looked it up today, as I was not familiar enough with neutral yet. >Looking at the behaviour from other systems, freebsd and netbsd both >retur

Bug#826290: libc6-i686: Neither "$ aptitude show" or "$ apt-cache show" says libc6-i686 is a virtual package

2016-06-03 Thread Kingsley G. Morse Jr.
Package: libc6-i686 Version: 2.22-7 Severity: minor Hey guys, I hope you're well. * What led up to the situation? While installing security patches, aptitude asked if it would be OK to remove libc6-i686, and neither $ apt-cache show libc6-i686 or $ aptitude show