On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 04:15:44PM -0700, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Hi Kurt,
>
> In November, 2012, you wrote (re elfutils's plugin path):
>
> > unarchive 632281
> > reopen 632281
> > #It doesnt do the right thing in case of non-multi arch now
>
> How should $LIB be set to support this? I'm wo
AFAICS the mesa folks don't rely upon the os abi tag anymore:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26663
Regards
Harri
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-glibc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.d
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 716795 + patch
Bug #716795 [src:gcc-4.8] generated library packages aren't marked Multiarch
when cross compiling gcc
Added tag(s) patch.
> tags 715059 + patch
Bug #715059 [eglibc] Fix hardcode libdir when bootstrapping
Added tag(s) patch.
>
Author: ps-guest
Date: 2013-07-14 18:46:05 + (Sun, 14 Jul 2013)
New Revision: 5665
Modified:
glibc-package/trunk/debian/changelog
glibc-package/trunk/debian/patches/kfreebsd/local-sysdeps.diff
glibc-package/trunk/debian/testsuite-checking/expected-results-i486-kfreebsd-gnu-libc
g
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 572895
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.
> tags 572895 + upstream
Bug #572895 [libc-bin] ldconfig issue: priority of /lib and /usr/lib is too high
Added tag(s) upstream.
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me
severity 572895
tags 572895 + upstream
quit
Harald Dunkel wrote:
> AFAICS the mesa folks don't rely upon the os abi tag anymore:
>
> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26663
Thanks.
I think this is still a bug (priority between LD_LIBRARY_PATH and
.note.ABI-tag makes .note.ABI-tag muc
Hi,
Do you have a position regarding this ?
TL;DR: better manpages may be provided by manpages pkg:
http://people.debian.org/~spaillard/libc-or-manpages/
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 11:48:51PM +0200, Simon Paillard wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 12:34:55AM +0100, Petr Baudis wrote:
> > Package: li
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # difficult
> severity 572895 wishlist
Bug #572895 [libc-bin] ldconfig issue: priority of /lib and /usr/lib is too high
Severity set to 'wishlist' from 'normal'
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Simon Paillard wrote:
> Do you have a position regarding this ?
[...]
> On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 11:48:51PM +0200, Simon Paillard wrote:
>> If you agree with this, the next manpages{,dev} upload will replace libc-bin
>> with appropriate version, then you can drop them.
Please go ahead. (I'm not
On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 01:27:06PM -0700, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
>
> >> If you agree with this, the next manpages{,dev} upload will replace
> >> libc-bin
> >> with appropriate version, then you can drop them.
>
> Please go ahead. (I'm not an eglibc maintainer, but it seems so
> obviously the ri
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 716775 + upstream
Bug #716775 [libc6] libc6:amd64: mismatch between strcasecmp and
toupper/tolower in tr_TR.iso88599 locale
Added tag(s) upstream.
> # unstandardized, correct behavior unclear
> severity 716775 wishlist
Bug #716775 [libc6] li
11 matches
Mail list logo