On Mon, Apr 02, 2012 at 05:37:54PM +0200, Sebastian Rasmussen wrote:
> I have problems running 32-bit binaries in my 64-bit valgrind, however
> this likely a bug related to eglibc or possibly in how valgrind
> depends on eglibc's packages. I expect that both 32-bit and 64-bit
> binaries can be run
On Tue, Apr 03, 2012 at 10:47:14AM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 02, 2012 at 05:37:54PM +0200, Sebastian Rasmussen wrote:
> > I have problems running 32-bit binaries in my 64-bit valgrind, however
> > this likely a bug related to eglibc or possibly in how valgrind
> > depends on eglib
Package: src:eglibc
Version: 2.13-27
Severity: normal
Tags: upstream
Blocks: 667005
gcc-4.7 and binutils (2.22) already provide support for the x32 abi. The
missing piece to producing x32 binaries is a c library. Patches are
available at git://github.com/hjl-tools/glibc.git. An aspect that makes
s
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 667005 with 667023
Bug #667005 [gcc-4.7-multilib] gcc-4.7-multilib: fails to find libgcc when
linking a x32 binary
667005 was not blocked by any bugs.
667005 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 667005: 667023
> thanks
Stoppi
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 667023 wishlist
Bug #667023 [src:eglibc] src:eglibc: please provide a binary package for the
x32 sub architecture on amd64
Severity set to 'wishlist' from 'normal'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assista
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 667023 with 667005
Bug #667023 [src:eglibc] src:eglibc: please provide a binary package for the
x32 sub architecture on amd64
667023 was not blocked by any bugs.
667023 was blocking: 667005
Added blocking bug(s) of 667023: 667005
> thanks
S
Le 03/04/2012 15:02, Helmut Grohne a écrit :
> Package: src:eglibc
> Version: 2.13-27
> Severity: normal
> Tags: upstream
> Blocks: 667005
>
> gcc-4.7 and binutils (2.22) already provide support for the x32 abi. The
> missing piece to producing x32 binaries is a c library. Patches are
> available
tag 666774 - moreinfo
thanks
Le 02/04/2012 13:57, John David Anglin a écrit :
> On 2-Apr-12, at 4:40 AM, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
>
>> tag 666774 + moreinfo
>> thanks
>>
>> Le 01/04/2012 20:48, Dave Anglin a écrit :
>>> Source: eglibc
>>> Version: 2.13-27
>>> Severity: important
>>> Tags: patch
>>
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tag 666774 - moreinfo
Bug #666774 [src:eglibc] eglibc: Updated hppa patch set for version 2.13
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
666774: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugrep
On 4/3/2012 9:31 AM, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
tag 666774 - moreinfo
thanks
Le 02/04/2012 13:57, John David Anglin a écrit :
On 2-Apr-12, at 4:40 AM, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
tag 666774 + moreinfo
thanks
Le 01/04/2012 20:48, Dave Anglin a écrit :
Source: eglibc
Version: 2.13-27
Severity: importa
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 667023 with 667037
Bug #667023 [src:eglibc] src:eglibc: please provide a binary package for the
x32 sub architecture on amd64
667023 was blocked by: 667005
667023 was blocking: 667005
Added blocking bug(s) of 667023: 667037
> thanks
Stoppin
Package: libc0.1
Version: 2.13-9
A few daemons (bootlogd and IIRC sshd as well) cause this kernel message to
be printed in the console during boot.
There was an attempt to fix this (see
http://lists.debian.org/debian-bsd/2011/06/msg00111.html) but unfortunately
the implementation of new ptys was
12 matches
Mail list logo
