On 17 December 2011 09:17, peter green
wrote:
> While we are talking about modifying sys/ucontext.h David Given
> raised another issue with that header (for those reading on the linaro list
> his
> post can be found at
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-arm/2011/12/msg00048.html)
> David Given>This
On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 02:52:53AM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Aurelien Jarno dixit:
>
> >I have dropped it in favor of the default version for the next upload.
>
> Why don’t you just use these? (Tested for 32-bit and 64-bit both.)
I am not an m68k porter, and I am not planning to try things
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 652428 + pending
Bug #652428 [eglibc] eglibc: [INTL:ru] Russian debconf templates translation
update
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
652428: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-b
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 07:40:53PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-12-14 at 07:54 +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 06:41:54PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2011-12-13 at 17:55 +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > > > Would it be possible to upload this
Author: aurel32
Date: 2011-12-17 11:31:05 + (Sat, 17 Dec 2011)
New Revision: 5090
Modified:
glibc-package/trunk/debian/changelog
glibc-package/trunk/debian/po/ru.po
Log:
* Update Russian debconf translation, by Yuri Kozlov. Closes: #652428.
Modified: glibc-package/trunk/debian/chan
Author: aurel32
Date: 2011-12-17 11:31:43 + (Sat, 17 Dec 2011)
New Revision: 5091
Modified:
glibc-package/branches/glibc-branch-squeeze/debian/changelog
Log:
Upload to stable
Modified: glibc-package/branches/glibc-branch-squeeze/debian/changelog
===
eglibc_2.11.3-2_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
eglibc_2.11.3-2.dsc
eglibc_2.11.3-2.diff.gz
glibc-doc_2.11.3-2_all.deb
eglibc-source_2.11.3-2_all.deb
locales_2.11.3-2_all.deb
libc6_2.11.3-2_amd64.deb
libc6-dev_2.11.3-2_amd64.deb
libc6-prof_2.11
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the
override file for the following file(s):
libc6-i386_2.11.3-2_amd64.deb: package says priority is optional, override says
standard.
locales-all_2.11.3-2_amd64.deb: package says section is localization, override
says libs.
Pleas
Aurelien Jarno dixit:
>I am not an m68k porter, and I am not planning to try things. m68k is
>lagging upstream wrt other architectures. Please work with upstream to
>fix things, then I can include tested and accepted patches.
I’m not an m68k porter either, but this fix is easily done from working
Konstantinos Margaritis wrote:
Does anyone know what the impact of renaming these to use a REG_ prefix like
i386, amd64 and sparc do* would be?
at worst the packages that had to be workaround on arm* for this, can
have the workaround removed.
I have prepared a patch (attatched) that eliminates t
On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 12:51:48PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Aurelien Jarno dixit:
>
> >I am not an m68k porter, and I am not planning to try things. m68k is
> >lagging upstream wrt other architectures. Please work with upstream to
> >fix things, then I can include tested and accepted patche
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 636286 + wontfix
Bug #636286 [src:eglibc] eglibc: SIGSEGV in strcoll in UTF-8 locales with
certain characters
Added tag(s) wontfix.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
636286: http://bugs.debian.
Aurelien Jarno dixit:
>If you are not an m68k porter, you should simply stop to care about
>m68k porting issues.
I care about the entire Open Source ecosystem. (Way to motivate people.)
bye,
//mirabilos
--
13:22⎜«neurodamage» mira, what's up man? I have a CVS question for you in #cvs
13:22⎜«ne
On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 02:45:26PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Aurelien Jarno dixit:
>
> >If you are not an m68k porter, you should simply stop to care about
> >m68k porting issues.
>
> I care about the entire Open Source ecosystem. (Way to motivate people.)
>
Then if you care, do the work
On Sat, 2011-12-17 at 12:36 +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> As you pointed me on IRC, the build failed on arm, mips and mipsel. It's
> due to a file out of sync between the main repository and the ports
> repository hosting theses architectures. I have backported the missing
> change to version 2.11
Thorsten Glaser writes:
> Aurelien Jarno dixit:
>
>>I am not an m68k porter, and I am not planning to try things. m68k is
>>lagging upstream wrt other architectures. Please work with upstream to
>>fix things, then I can include tested and accepted patches.
>
> I’m not an m68k porter either, but t
Notes:
Mapping stable to proposed-updates.
Accepted:
eglibc-source_2.11.3-2_all.deb
to main/e/eglibc/eglibc-source_2.11.3-2_all.deb
eglibc_2.11.3-2.diff.gz
to main/e/eglibc/eglibc_2.11.3-2.diff.gz
eglibc_2.11.3-2.dsc
to main/e/eglibc/eglibc_2.11.3-2.dsc
glibc-doc_2.11.3-2_all.deb
to mai
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the
override file for the following file(s):
libc6-i386_2.11.3-2_amd64.deb: package says priority is optional, override says
standard.
locales-all_2.11.3-2_amd64.deb: package says section is localization, override
says libs.
Pleas
Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> If you are not an m68k porter, you should simply stop to care about
> m68k porting issues.
There are kinder ways to say that.
Thorsten, can you test this patch or arrange for it to be tested?
commit fb3ed187
Author: Andreas Schwab
Date: Sun Mar 6 19:52:43 2011 +0100
Jonathan Nieder dixit:
>There are kinder ways to say that.
Thanks.
>Thorsten, can you test this patch or arrange for it to be tested?
Will do that once the next buildhost gets idle (one is currently
building gcc-4.6 (second upload in one day), the other working
its something off to build a kern
On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 7:57 AM, peter green wrote:
>> mind also looking at WCHAR_MIN/MAX undefined for arm?
>> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=598937
>
> They most certainly are defined. The trouble is that WCHAR_MAX is defined
> in a strange way.
>
> #define __WCHAR_MAX ( (w
On Sat, 17 Dec 2011, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Finn Thain dixit:
>
> >It might be worth running the tests on physical hardware instead of an
> >emulator.
>
> You just volunteered.
You just promoted me to Debian Developer.
Finn
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-glibc-requ...@lists.debian.o
ISO C99 says that WCHAR_MAX must be a constant expression and the
above definition is such an expression. Technically the program needs
fixing (see below though for the "standards matter but so do users"),
there is nothing wrong with a type cast and a constant value e.g.
signed -1 converted to u
On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 7:54 PM, peter green wrote:
>> Your patch to fix ucontext namespace pollution looks good, please post
>> that to libc-ports for review
>
> should I send it immidiately or should I wait until I have test results to
> give them?
Wait until the test results are complete and y
Sayın Yetkili;
Yeni yılda firmalarımız için hazırladığımız İYİ SENELER DİLER proje detayları
aşağıdaki gibidir.
29-30-31 Aralık tarihlerinde her kanalda günde 7 defa şeklinde yayınlanacaktır.
1.SKYTURK 21 ADET 4SN.LİK KUŞAK REKLAM(84sn.)
2.KANALTURK 21 ADET 4SN.LİK KUŞAK RE
25 matches
Mail list logo
