r3174 - in glibc-package/branches/glibc-2.8/debian: . patches patches/any testsuite-checking

Author: aurel32 Date: 2008-10-26 10:11:16 + (Sun, 26 Oct 2008) New Revision: 3174 Added: glibc-package/branches/glibc-2.8/debian/patches/any/cvs-bug-iconv6_tst-iconv7.diff Modified: glibc-package/branches/glibc-2.8/debian/changelog glibc-package/branches/glibc-2.8/debian/patches/seri

Processing of glibc_2.8+20080809-3_amd64.changes

/glibc_2.8+20080809-3_amd64.changes is already present on target host: glibc_2.8+20080809.orig.tar.gz Either you already uploaded it, or someone else came first. Job glibc_2.8+20080809-3_amd64.changes removed. Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTE

Processing of glibc_2.8+20080809-3_amd64.changes

glibc_2.8+20080809-3_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: glibc_2.8+20080809-3.dsc glibc_2.8+20080809-3.diff.gz glibc-doc_2.8+20080809-3_all.deb glibc-source_2.8+20080809-3_all.deb locales_2.8+20080809-3_all.deb libc6_2.8+20080809-3_amd64.deb libc6-de

glibc_2.8+20080809-3_amd64.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: glibc-doc_2.8+20080809-3_all.deb to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc-doc_2.8+20080809-3_all.deb glibc-source_2.8+20080809-3_all.deb to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc-source_2.8+20080809-3_all.deb glibc_2.8+20080809-3.diff.gz to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc_2.8+20080809-3.diff.gz glibc_2.8+20080809-3.ds

glibc override disparity

There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the override file for the following file(s): libc6-i386_2.8+20080809-3_amd64.deb: package says priority is optional, override says standard. Either the package or the override file is incorrect. If you think the override is correct

Bug#485165: marked as done (glibc: FTBFS when converted to new source format 3.0 (quilt): patch files contained in tarballs)

Your message dated Sun, 26 Oct 2008 23:17:14 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#485165: fixed in glibc 2.8+20080809-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #485165, regarding glibc: FTBFS when converted to new source format 3.0 (quilt): patch files contained in tarballs to

Bug#499689: marked as done (libc6: Now that lenny is frozen, glibc should (?) have a newer version in MIN_KERNEL_SUPPORTED)

Your message dated Sun, 26 Oct 2008 23:17:14 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#499689: fixed in glibc 2.8+20080809-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #499689, regarding libc6: Now that lenny is frozen, glibc should (?) have a newer version in MIN_KERNEL_SUPPORTED to b

Bug#499769: marked as done (Add Vcs-* fields)

Your message dated Sun, 26 Oct 2008 23:17:14 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#499769: fixed in glibc 2.8+20080809-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #499769, regarding Add Vcs-* fields to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wi

Bug#494908: marked as done (glibc_2.8+20080809-1(hppa/experimental): FTBFS: No rule to make target `/build/buildd/glibc-2.8+20080809/build-tree/hppa-libc/linuxthreads/ ptw-write.o')

Your message dated Sun, 26 Oct 2008 23:17:14 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#494908: fixed in glibc 2.8+20080809-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #494908, regarding glibc_2.8+20080809-1(hppa/experimental): FTBFS: No rule to make target `/build/buildd/glibc-2.8+200

Bug#498516: marked as done (libc6: should conflict with nscd < 2.8)

Your message dated Sun, 26 Oct 2008 23:17:14 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#498516: fixed in glibc 2.8+20080809-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #498516, regarding libc6: should conflict with nscd < 2.8 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the pro

Bug#466340: marked as done (Some conversions to ISO-2022-JP produce invalid text)

Your message dated Sun, 26 Oct 2008 23:17:14 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#466340: fixed in glibc 2.8+20080809-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #466340, regarding Some conversions to ISO-2022-JP produce invalid text to be marked as done. This means that you clai

Bug#493231: marked as done (locale names are not in alphabetical order in locales.postinst)

Your message dated Sun, 26 Oct 2008 23:17:14 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#493231: fixed in glibc 2.8+20080809-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #493231, regarding locale names are not in alphabetical order in locales.postinst to be marked as done. This means tha

Bug#497449: marked as done (libc6: iconv -f latin9 doesn't work any more)

Your message dated Sun, 26 Oct 2008 23:17:14 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#497449: fixed in glibc 2.8+20080809-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #497449, regarding libc6: iconv -f latin9 doesn't work any more to be marked as done. This means that you claim that t