Package: glibc
Version: 2.7-11
Severity: important
Please build libc6-hppa64 and libc6-hppa64-dev packages; there is no
package build-depending on libc6-hppa64-dev, but we need these
packages to run the testsuites for binutils and gcc-4.X. Currently
these packages are completely untested, although
severity 482902 wishlist
tag 482902 + upstream
tag 482902 + wontfix
thanks
Matthias Klose a écrit :
> Package: glibc
> Version: 2.7-11
> Severity: important
>
> Please build libc6-hppa64 and libc6-hppa64-dev packages; there is no
> package build-depending on libc6-hppa64-dev, but we need these
>
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 482902 wishlist
Bug#482902: please provide libc6-hppa64 and libc6-hppa64-dev packages
Severity set to `wishlist' from `important'
> tag 482902 + upstream
Bug#482902: please provide libc6-hppa64 and libc6-hppa64-dev packages
There were no tags
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> clone 482902 -1
Bug#482902: please provide libc6-hppa64 and libc6-hppa64-dev packages
Bug 482902 cloned as bug 482921.
> reassign -1 general
Bug#482921: please provide libc6-hppa64 and libc6-hppa64-dev packages
Bug reassigned from package `glibc' to `g
clone 482902 -1
reassign -1 general
severity -1 serious
thanks
Aurelien Jarno writes:
> severity 482902 wishlist
> tag 482902 + upstream
> tag 482902 + wontfix
> thanks
>
> Matthias Klose a écrit :
> > Package: glibc
> > Version: 2.7-11
> > Severity: important
> >
> > Please build libc6-hppa64 a
On Sun, May 25, 2008 at 11:21 PM, Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >
>> > Please build libc6-hppa64 and libc6-hppa64-dev packages; there is no
>> > package build-depending on libc6-hppa64-dev, but we need these
>> > packages to run the testsuites for binutils and gcc-4.X. Currently
>>
On Sun, May 25, 2008 at 11:21:28PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> that's fine. in this case we should drop support for hppa for lenny.
Probably a good idea. I don't think anyone's doing much work with hppa
and Debian any more.
--
Intel are signing my paycheques ... these opinions are still mine
On Mon, May 26, 2008 at 12:14 AM, Matthew Wilcox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, May 25, 2008 at 11:21:28PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
>> that's fine. in this case we should drop support for hppa for lenny.
>
> Probably a good idea. I don't think anyone's doing much work with hppa
> and Deb
Package: tzdata
Version: 2008b-1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch l10n
Please find attached the update file which adds the missing untraslated strings.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i6
On Mon, May 26, 2008 at 01:17:06AM +0200, Thibaut VARENE wrote:
> On Mon, May 26, 2008 at 12:14 AM, Matthew Wilcox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sun, May 25, 2008 at 11:21:28PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> >> that's fine. in this case we should drop support for hppa for lenny.
> >
> > Probabl
10 matches
Mail list logo
