It's not that easy in the swi-prolog case. The two headers are included
in two separate headers, which are then included into the .c file. The
order cannot be switched around, because the former header includes
config.h, which is needed for the second header to work at all (IIRC).
Can't you j
peter green a écrit :
>> It's not that easy in the swi-prolog case. The two headers are included
>> in two separate headers, which are then included into the .c file. The
>> order cannot be switched around, because the former header includes
>> config.h, which is needed for the second header t
Author: aurel32
Date: 2007-11-29 10:26:22 + (Thu, 29 Nov 2007)
New Revision: 2718
Modified:
glibc-package/trunk/debian/changelog
glibc-package/trunk/debian/patches/any/submitted-malloc_h.diff
Log:
Also define __need_NULL in malloc.h
Modified: glibc-package/trunk/debian/changelog
==
Package: libc6
Version: 2.7-2
Severity: normal
the following code can show you that sscanf() on empty string gets
invalid pointer if %as is used.
#include
int main()
{
char *buf = "";
char *str;
sscanf (buf
Hi Libc maintainers,
Could you please comment on this issue?
Thank you!
On 29/11/07 at 00:52 +, brian m. carlson wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 29, 2007 at 01:48:33AM +0200, Faidon Liambotis wrote:
>> I will upload after confirming that this changing sys/time.h is supposed
>> to be OK (I don't believe
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26
> reassign 453408 libc6-dev
Bug#453408: libc6: sscanf dies on an empty string if %as is used
Bug reassigned from package `libc6' to `libc6-dev'.
>
End of message, stopping processing h
Lucas Nussbaum a écrit :
> Hi Libc maintainers,
>
> Could you please comment on this issue?
As far as I understand, the patch is correct. If you need a header you
have to include it and do not assume it is included by another one. This
also improves portability among various OS.
Aurelien
> Than
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26
> forcemerge 155835 453408
Bug#155835: libc6-dev: scanf a flag conflicts with C99
Bug#453408: libc6: sscanf dies on an empty string if %as is used
Forcibly Merged 155835 453408.
>
End
Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> As far as I understand, the patch is correct. If you need a header you
> have to include it and do not assume it is included by another one. This
> also improves portability among various OS.
My concern was that this is breaking various unrelated packages.
Lucas said though
Faidon Liambotis a écrit :
> Aurelien Jarno wrote:
>> As far as I understand, the patch is correct. If you need a header you
>> have to include it and do not assume it is included by another one. This
>> also improves portability among various OS.
> My concern was that this is breaking various unre
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26
> tags 453131 + pending
Bug#453131: most recent version breaks use of custom locales
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please con
Author: aurel32
Date: 2007-11-29 17:02:57 + (Thu, 29 Nov 2007)
New Revision: 2719
Added:
glibc-package/trunk/debian/debhelper.in/locales.README
Modified:
glibc-package/trunk/debian/changelog
glibc-package/trunk/debian/debhelper.in/locales.NEWS
glibc-package/trunk/debian/debhelper.i
Pierre Habouzit a écrit :
> On Sat, Nov 24, 2007 at 12:35:23PM +, Bas Zoetekouw wrote:
>> Package: libc6
>> Version: 2.6.1-6
>> Severity: important
>>
>> When I tried to upgrade my cowbuilder environment (i386 env on amd64),
>> I got this error:
>
> you do that using linux32 ? (I don't think
Your message dated Thu, 29 Nov 2007 19:17:05 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#453264: fixed in glibc 2.7-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your r
Your message dated Thu, 29 Nov 2007 19:17:05 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#453131: fixed in glibc 2.7-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your r
Your message dated Thu, 29 Nov 2007 19:17:05 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#344470: fixed in glibc 2.7-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your r
Your message dated Thu, 29 Nov 2007 19:17:05 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#344470: fixed in glibc 2.7-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your r
Your message dated Thu, 29 Nov 2007 19:17:05 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#453326: fixed in glibc 2.7-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your r
Your message dated Thu, 29 Nov 2007 19:17:05 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#344470: fixed in glibc 2.7-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your r
Your message dated Thu, 29 Nov 2007 19:17:05 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#452890: fixed in glibc 2.7-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your r
Your message dated Thu, 29 Nov 2007 19:17:05 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#453041: fixed in glibc 2.7-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your r
Package: libc6
Version: 2.7-2
Severity: important
I had libc 2.6.1-2 when I'm trying to upgrade to 2.7-2. I have segfaut:
"Setting up libc6 (2.7-2) ...
dpkg: error processing libc6 (--configure):
subprocess post-installation script killed by signal (Segmentation fault)
"
# dpkg -l libc6
iF lib
Emil Nowak a écrit :
> Package: libc6
> Version: 2.7-2
> Severity: important
>
> I had libc 2.6.1-2 when I'm trying to upgrade to 2.7-2. I have segfaut:
> "Setting up libc6 (2.7-2) ...
> dpkg: error processing libc6 (--configure):
> subprocess post-installation script killed by signal (Segmentati
Hi. You've probably noticed that already, but: when generating all locales,
I get:
de_DE.UTF-8... done
de_DE.ISO-8859-1... done
[EMAIL PROTECTED] done
de_LI.UTF-8.../usr/share/i18n/locales/de_LI:73: LC_TELEPHONE: syntax error
done
de_LU.UTF-8... done
de_LU.ISO-8859-1... done
[EMAIL
Package: locales
Version: 2.7-3
Severity: minor
I got this (from apt-listchanges ?) when upgrading to 2.7-3:
"Starting with locales 2.7-3, users can provide their own locales in
/usr/local/share/i18n. See /usr/share/locales/README.Debian for
more information."
... However:
LC_ALL=C ls -
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26
> tags 453613 + pending
Bug#453613: locales: Minor typo in NEWS.Debian
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you
Author: aurel32
Date: 2007-11-30 07:13:21 + (Fri, 30 Nov 2007)
New Revision: 2720
Modified:
glibc-package/trunk/debian/changelog
glibc-package/trunk/debian/patches/localedata/locale-de_LI.diff
Log:
* patches/localedata/locale-de_LI.diff: fix locale.
Modified: glibc-package/trunk/deb
Package: locales
Version: 2.7-3
Severity: minor
The 2.7.2 entry in NEWS.Debian mentions "no_NB" as the new locale for
Norwegian Bokmål while it is of course nb_NO.
The maintainer scripts do The Right Thing, so that error is only present in
NEWS.Debian, indeed.
-- System Information:
Debian Relea
On 29-11-2007 Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> Could you please edit /var/lib/dpkg/info/libc6.postinst and change
> '#!/bin/sh' into '#!/bin/sh -x'? Then run 'apt-get install -f' and send
> us the debugging output.
"Setting up libc6 (2.7-2) ...
+ set -e
+ export LC_ALL=C
+ LC_ALL=C
+ type=configure
+ preve
Author: aurel32
Date: 2007-11-30 07:18:23 + (Fri, 30 Nov 2007)
New Revision: 2721
Added:
glibc-package/trunk/debian/debhelper.in/locales.README.Debian
Removed:
glibc-package/trunk/debian/debhelper.in/locales.README
Modified:
glibc-package/trunk/debian/changelog
glibc-package/trunk/
Author: aurel32
Date: 2007-11-30 07:24:04 + (Fri, 30 Nov 2007)
New Revision: 2722
Modified:
glibc-package/trunk/debian/changelog
glibc-package/trunk/debian/debhelper.in/locales.NEWS
Log:
* debian/debhelper/in/locales.NEWS: fix a typo. Closes: bug#453613.
Modified: glibc-package/tru
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26
> tags 453515 + pending
Bug#453515: Missing file on locales 2.7-3
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need
32 matches
Mail list logo
