Bug#308341: glibc-doc: SO_RCVBUF documented as size_t, but is int in Linux.

2005-05-09 Thread Teddy Hogeborn
Package: glibc-doc Version: 2.3.2.ds1-21 Severity: normal In "(libc)Socket-Level Options", SO_RCVBUF is documented as having a type "size_t". In Linux, it is of type "int". The man page socket(7) does not say what type it is. The same goes for SO_SNDBUF. This is mostly a problem on 64-bit arch

Re: Proposed fix for ld.so assertion failures for sarge

2005-05-09 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
On Sun, May 08, 2005 at 01:35:27PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > At the bottom of this message is a diff against glibc 2.3.2.ds1-21 which > fixes merged bugs 207872, 210840, 274852, and 276384. I spoke with Colin on > IRC and he seemed amenable to this as a last-minute fix for sarge. Does > a

Bug#307985: libc6: 2.3.5-1 ppc built lacks GLIBC_2.3.3 version in libpthread

2005-05-09 Thread Benjamin Herrenschmidt
The bug has been fixed in gcc (though it may not have hit 3.4 CVS yet). See debian #307993 for details. This bug was causing any arch to die when building glibc with -g1, it's a gcc 3.4 regression, and now that it's fixed, it should be possible to switch the 2.3.5 package to gcc 3.4 (well, at least

my personal site

2005-05-09 Thread Kristine Hollingsworth
Whats up my name is Julie. I am from Texas. One day I was very bored so I have decided to open up my own privet cam show on the interweb. The best part about my site, Its free and I am usually on 24/5. I am sure you will have a fun time. I am very active and I love to play :D. Its live and Its f