Email loading..
Image not showing? See message here.
Stop all announcements.
zQxx1.V0vmm/5o1Lg1GNmJl01ROIx/MYcqN0t7abl06JQMK/
woakxq tlgv, kilbku, loij . gzoldg cwc tsfmf, huzs, acc . pruyk
zaofio esvx, dkpqt, sns . puehl hxch qoigx, yski, wzosjg . davahe
illk lci, khikcv, ztt . lfxr yok sy
Your message dated Wed, 21 Apr 2004 16:09:47 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#244610: libc6-dev: No header file declares log2l().
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not th
Repository: glibc-package/debian/sysdeps
who:gotom
time: Wed Apr 21 03:00:57 MDT 2004
Log Message:
make symlink /usr/hppa64-linux/include for libc6-dev, not libc6.
Files:
changed:hppa.mk
Repository: glibc-package/debian/patches
who:gotom
time: Wed Apr 21 03:03:37 MDT 2004
Log Message:
drop applying debian/patches/translation-fr.dpatch for a while.
Files:
changed:00list
Jacquelyn +
The cablefilterz will allow you to receive
all the channels that you order with your remote control,^
payperviews,aXXXmovies,sport events,special-events#
http://www.aol43566.com/cable/
cochineal ,chubby .
Isn't it CAN-2003-0689? (I have not seen that fixed in libc6's
changelog.Debian.gz.) The CAN itself states that versions 2.2.4 and older
are affected, but eg. http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/8477 says that even
2.2.5 in Woody is affected. So may it be right, or is this something else?
norbi
Your message dated Wed, 21 Apr 2004 11:43:35 +0100 (BST)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Not a bug
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Repository: glibc-package/debian/debhelper.in
who:gotom
time: Wed Apr 21 07:00:18 MDT 2004
Log Message:
- debian/debhelper.in/libc.install: drop installing three files:
debian/local/etc_init.d/mountkernfs, debian/local/etc_default/devpts,
and debian/local/etc_defaul
Repository: glibc-package/debian
who:gotom
time: Wed Apr 21 07:00:18 MDT 2004
Log Message:
- debian/debhelper.in/libc.install: drop installing three files:
debian/local/etc_init.d/mountkernfs, debian/local/etc_default/devpts,
and debian/local/etc_default/tmpfs. Bec
Repository: glibc-package/debian
who:gotom
time: Wed Apr 21 09:53:23 MDT 2004
Log Message:
- debian/debhelper.in/libc.postrm: comment out mountkernfs purge.
Files:
changed:changelog
Repository: glibc-package/debian/debhelper.in
who:gotom
time: Wed Apr 21 09:53:23 MDT 2004
Log Message:
- debian/debhelper.in/libc.postrm: comment out mountkernfs purge.
Files:
changed:libc.postrm
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # confirmed by accident
> tags 221982 =
Bug#221982: [FP: checks/shared-libs] no-shlibs-control-file with libnss
Tags were: confirmed
Tags set to:
> # As the report says, glibc is doing things wrong apparantly
> reassign 221982 glibc
Bug#221982: [FP: c
# confirmed by accident
tags 221982 =
# As the report says, glibc is doing things wrong apparantly
reassign 221982 glibc
retitle 221982 Shouldn't put nss modules in /lib
thanks
glibc is misplacing libnss_* according to Andrew Suffield.
Disclaimer: I don't know that these files do, I trust this to
Your message dated Wed, 21 Apr 2004 14:03:33 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#221982: glibc's at fault here...
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Benoit,
Govenment don't want me to sell
UndergroundCD !Check Your spouse and staff
Investigate Your Own CREDIT-HISTORY
hacking someone PC!
Disappear in your city
bannedcd2004
http://www.9001hosting.com/cd/
cosh,anything to stop.
Repository: glibc-package/debian
who:gotom
time: Wed Apr 21 17:56:55 MDT 2004
Log Message:
- debian/rules.d/debhelper.mk: Fix build failure in strip processing.
- Revert my last changes for this file with wrong fix. Thanks to Daniel.
Files:
changed:changelog
Repository: glibc-package/debian/rules.d
who:gotom
time: Wed Apr 21 17:56:55 MDT 2004
Log Message:
- debian/rules.d/debhelper.mk: Fix build failure in strip processing.
- Revert my last changes for this file with wrong fix. Thanks to Daniel.
Files:
changed:debhel
Your message dated Thu, 22 Apr 2004 09:18:27 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#241393: SPARC64 binaries work fine.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
reopen 221982
reassign 221982 lintian
thanks
On Wed, Apr 21, 2004 at 02:03:33PM -0700, Jeff Bailey wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 21, 2004 at 10:10:43PM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
>
> > glibc is misplacing libnss_* according to Andrew Suffield.
That's not what I said. It sucks that glibc is keepi
hello glibc mainainers,
I screwed up badly with aptitude and wiped a good portion of my Sid
system (on powerpc), including libc6. Now trying to reinstall, and
having a terrible time with a conflict btwn libc6 and initscripts.
Here's the output of aptitude (on the command line):
[00:03:[EMAIL PRO
Your message dated Wed, 21 Apr 2004 16:09:47 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#244610: libc6-dev: No header file declares log2l().
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not th
Repository: glibc-package/debian/sysdeps
who:gotom
time: Wed Apr 21 03:00:57 MDT 2004
Log Message:
make symlink /usr/hppa64-linux/include for libc6-dev, not libc6.
Files:
changed:hppa.mk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Troubl
Repository: glibc-package/debian/patches
who:gotom
time: Wed Apr 21 03:03:37 MDT 2004
Log Message:
drop applying debian/patches/translation-fr.dpatch for a while.
Files:
changed:00list
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble?
Jacquelyn +
The cablefilterz will allow you to receive
all the channels that you order with your remote control,^
payperviews,aXXXmovies,sport events,special-events#
http://www.aol43566.com/cable/
cochineal ,chubby .
Isn't it CAN-2003-0689? (I have not seen that fixed in libc6's
changelog.Debian.gz.) The CAN itself states that versions 2.2.4 and older
are affected, but eg. http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/8477 says that even
2.2.5 in Woody is affected. So may it be right, or is this something else?
norbi
--
Your message dated Wed, 21 Apr 2004 11:43:35 +0100 (BST)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Not a bug
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Repository: glibc-package/debian/debhelper.in
who:gotom
time: Wed Apr 21 07:00:18 MDT 2004
Log Message:
- debian/debhelper.in/libc.install: drop installing three files:
debian/local/etc_init.d/mountkernfs, debian/local/etc_default/devpts,
and debian/local/etc_defaul
Repository: glibc-package/debian
who:gotom
time: Wed Apr 21 07:00:18 MDT 2004
Log Message:
- debian/debhelper.in/libc.install: drop installing three files:
debian/local/etc_init.d/mountkernfs, debian/local/etc_default/devpts,
and debian/local/etc_default/tmpfs. Bec
Repository: glibc-package/debian
who:gotom
time: Wed Apr 21 09:53:23 MDT 2004
Log Message:
- debian/debhelper.in/libc.postrm: comment out mountkernfs purge.
Files:
changed:changelog
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Troub
Repository: glibc-package/debian/debhelper.in
who:gotom
time: Wed Apr 21 09:53:23 MDT 2004
Log Message:
- debian/debhelper.in/libc.postrm: comment out mountkernfs purge.
Files:
changed:libc.postrm
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsu
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # confirmed by accident
> tags 221982 =
Bug#221982: [FP: checks/shared-libs] no-shlibs-control-file with libnss
Tags were: confirmed
Tags set to:
> # As the report says, glibc is doing things wrong apparantly
> reassign 221982 glibc
Bug#221982: [FP: c
# confirmed by accident
tags 221982 =
# As the report says, glibc is doing things wrong apparantly
reassign 221982 glibc
retitle 221982 Shouldn't put nss modules in /lib
thanks
glibc is misplacing libnss_* according to Andrew Suffield.
Disclaimer: I don't know that these files do, I trust this to
Your message dated Wed, 21 Apr 2004 14:03:33 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#221982: glibc's at fault here...
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Benoit,
Govenment don't want me to sell
UndergroundCD !Check Your spouse and staff
Investigate Your Own CREDIT-HISTORY
hacking someone PC!
Disappear in your city
bannedcd2004
http://www.9001hosting.com/cd/
cosh,anything to stop.
Repository: glibc-package/debian
who:gotom
time: Wed Apr 21 17:56:55 MDT 2004
Log Message:
- debian/rules.d/debhelper.mk: Fix build failure in strip processing.
- Revert my last changes for this file with wrong fix. Thanks to Daniel.
Files:
changed:changelog
--
Repository: glibc-package/debian/rules.d
who:gotom
time: Wed Apr 21 17:56:55 MDT 2004
Log Message:
- debian/rules.d/debhelper.mk: Fix build failure in strip processing.
- Revert my last changes for this file with wrong fix. Thanks to Daniel.
Files:
changed:debhel
Your message dated Thu, 22 Apr 2004 09:18:27 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#241393: SPARC64 binaries work fine.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
reopen 221982
reassign 221982 lintian
thanks
On Wed, Apr 21, 2004 at 02:03:33PM -0700, Jeff Bailey wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 21, 2004 at 10:10:43PM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
>
> > glibc is misplacing libnss_* according to Andrew Suffield.
That's not what I said. It sucks that glibc is keepi
hello glibc mainainers,
I screwed up badly with aptitude and wiped a good portion of my Sid
system (on powerpc), including libc6. Now trying to reinstall, and
having a terrible time with a conflict btwn libc6 and initscripts.
Here's the output of aptitude (on the command line):
[00:03:[EMAIL PRO
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 221982
Bug#221982: Shouldn't put nss modules in /lib
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> reassign 221982 lintian
Bug#221982: Shouldn't put nss modules in /lib
Bug reassigned from package `glibc' to `lintian'.
> thanks
Stopping processing he
40 matches
Mail list logo