Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
> tags 149902 + wontfix
Bug#149902: date: does not understand some timezones
There were no tags set.
Tags added: wontfix
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact m
http://www.timeanddate.com/library/abbreviations/timezones/au/
Shows that 'EST' is in fact the most correct abbreviation for date to
return.
I'm tagging this bug as 'wontfix'.
--
In the United States, there isn't a government database that hasn't been
misused by the very people entrusted with k
I'm trying to figure out a way to make a testcase for this without
breaking my own system. (Hmm, what an ugly wishlist - per chroot
clocks.. but anyhow...)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/Programming/cvstree/libc/nss$ TZ=CST6CDT date
040200042001
date: cannot set date: Operation not permitted
Mon Apr 2 00:
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
> owner 89098 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#89098: shellutils: date cannot handle TZ=xxx+24
Owner recorded as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me
SUSv3 says this about the TZ offset:
The hour shall be between zero and 24, and the minutes (and seconds)-if
present-between zero and 59.
glibc currently clips this range at 23 hours.
2003-12-20 Jeff Bailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* time/tzset.c: Allow TZ offsets up to 24 hours.
Index:
Your message dated Sat, 20 Dec 2003 23:19:02 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Closing this bug
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
I've built a testcase for looking at this. When I run it, I get:
./a.out
No match found! Errno: 0
Can you please provide a better testcase? Otherwise, I'll assume the
bug is fixed and close it (By the end of January or so)
--
In the United States, there isn't a government database that hasn
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
> tags 221317 + pending
Bug#221317: latex2html moved to non-free
Tags were: patch
Tags added: pending
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assis
Your message dated Sun, 21 Dec 2003 00:41:19 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Closing after lack of response
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your res
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 67921
Bug#67921: glob(3) doesn't treat \ correctly
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 68602
Bug#68602: glibc-doc: GLOB_PERIOD incorrectly documented
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator,
Repository: glibc-package/debian
who:gotom
time: Sun Dec 21 10:01:53 MST 2003
Log Message:
- debian/local/etc_init.d/devpts.sh: rename to mountkernfs.
- debian/local/etc_init.d/mountkernfs: rename from devpts.sh, for
adding to mount tmpfs(shmfs) and sysfs.
-
Repository: glibc-package/debian/debhelper.in
who:gotom
time: Sun Dec 21 10:01:53 MST 2003
Log Message:
- debian/local/etc_init.d/devpts.sh: rename to mountkernfs.
- debian/local/etc_init.d/mountkernfs: rename from devpts.sh, for
adding to mount tmpfs(shmfs) and sy
Repository: glibc-package/debian/local/etc_default
who:gotom
time: Sun Dec 21 10:01:53 MST 2003
Log Message:
- debian/local/etc_init.d/devpts.sh: rename to mountkernfs.
- debian/local/etc_init.d/mountkernfs: rename from devpts.sh, for
adding to mount tmpfs(shmfs) a
Repository: glibc-package/debian/local/etc_init.d
who:gotom
time: Sun Dec 21 10:01:53 MST 2003
Log Message:
- debian/local/etc_init.d/devpts.sh: rename to mountkernfs.
- debian/local/etc_init.d/mountkernfs: rename from devpts.sh, for
adding to mount tmpfs(shmfs) an
At Thu, 18 Dec 2003 17:22:49 -0500,
Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 18, 2003 at 06:39:13PM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> > On Dec 18, GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > >OK, I would like to rename from /etc/init.d/devpts.sh to
> > >/etc/init.d/mountfs, because (1) for example
On Sun, Dec 21, 2003 at 01:00:01AM -0500, Jeff Bailey wrote:
> Daniel mentioned on IRC earlier the idea of disabling the errno warning
> for the Sarge release.
>
> I'd like to leave it in, but dormant by default - And ask aj to include
> a bit in the release notes telling people how to check their
Your message dated Sun, 21 Dec 2003 16:05:36 -0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug
Your message dated Sun, 21 Dec 2003 10:13:28 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug
Your message dated Sun, 21 Dec 2003 12:29:17 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Closing this bug
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 67921
Bug#67921: glob(3) doesn't treat \ correctly
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs
severity 224366 wishlist
thanks
There are arguments for both sides - Having absolute links makes it
harder to mount remote systems (for use in cross-compilers), and harder
to work with chroots.
In any event, having /usr be a symlink is an unusual configuration (on
Linux, anyway... *g*), so I'm go
reassign g++-3.2
thanks
Your simplified testcase doesn't involve glibc at all, reassigning to
g++-3.2
--
In the United States, there isn't a government database that hasn't been
misused by the very people entrusted with keeping its information safe.
- Bruce Schneier
signature.asc
Description:
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 68602
Bug#68602: glibc-doc: GLOB_PERIOD incorrectly documented
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator,
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 224366 wishlist
Bug#224366: libc6-dev: .so symlinks point to nowhere
Severity set to `wishlist'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bug
Package: glibc
Version: 2.3.2.ds1-10
Tags: patch
Please find attached a patch by Thiemo Seufer, which allows building
java (in gcc-snapshot) on the mips platform. Guido Guenther will
forward the bug upstream.
#! /bin/sh -e
# All lines beginning with `# DP:' are a description of the patch.
# DP:
On Sun, Dec 21, 2003 at 02:40:01PM -0800, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> I have heard reports that building the same source on Debian woody (glibc
> 2.2.5-11.5 with 2.4 kernel headers) works, however. I am going to be
> testing this myself shortly. If it works, the cause is most likely
> somewhere in g
Your message dated Sun, 21 Dec 2003 12:20:44 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#92520: Testcase?
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibilit
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> I have just verified this myself. Building user-mode-linux
> 2.4.22-7um-1 on woody works fine (even when running on unstable), but
> building it on unstable does not.
Conversely, does a unstable-built UML run on woody?
> The one built on unstable randomly sees ENOSYS fr
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
> reassign 205728 g++-3.2
Bug#205728: libc6-dev: libc6-dev incompatible with libstdc++5-dev
Bug reassigned from package `libc6-dev' to `g++-3.2'.
>
End of message, stopping processin
severity 224207 wishlist
severity 224248 wishlist
tag 224207 +wontfix
tag 224248 +wontfix
thanks
The glibc DDs have discussed this a few times - We've chosen not to
support 2.4 systems patched to support NPTL.
Some of the reasons for this include:
1) Not supported by either upstream (which means
Package: locales
Version: 2.3.2.ds1-10
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
[ia]
Per favor adde le file de definition pro interlingua, juncte a iste
email.
[en]
Please add interlingua definition file, attached to this email.
--
Saluti,
Mardy
http://interlingua.altervista.org
comment_char %
escape_
On Sun, Dec 21, 2003 at 02:09:42PM -0500, Jeff Bailey wrote:
> severity 224366 wishlist
> thanks
>
> There are arguments for both sides - Having absolute links makes it
> harder to mount remote systems (for use in cross-compilers), and harder
> to work with chroots.
>
> In any event, having /usr
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 224207 wishlist
Bug#224207: libc6-i686: Doesn't work with kernel 2.4 + nptl patch
Bug#224248: libc6-i686: Doesn't work with kernel 2.4 + nptl patch
Severity set to `wishlist'.
> severity 224248 wishlist
Bug#224248: libc6-i686: Doesn't work wit
On Sun, Dec 21, 2003 at 02:09:42PM -0500, Jeff Bailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There are arguments for both sides - Having absolute links makes it
Keep in mind that it's easy to detect and fix at installation time
(symlinks pointing to nowhere just aren't going to work...), so there
shouldn't
On Sun, Dec 21, 2003 at 07:25:47PM -0500, Jeff Dike wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> > I have just verified this myself. Building user-mode-linux
> > 2.4.22-7um-1 on woody works fine (even when running on unstable), but
> > building it on unstable does not.
>
> Conversely, does a unstable-buil
At Mon, 22 Dec 2003 01:15:13 +0100 (CET),
Marco d'Itri wrote:
> In linux.debian.maint.glibc GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >I've commited this feature in order to mount both tmpfs and sysfs into
> >the latest debian glibc cvs just now. Please check it.
> What about adding this too?
On Sun, Dec 21, 2003 at 08:08:57PM -0800, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 21, 2003 at 07:25:47PM -0500, Jeff Dike wrote:
>
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> > > I have just verified this myself. Building user-mode-linux
> > > 2.4.22-7um-1 on woody works fine (even when running on unstable), but
>
Daniel mentioned on IRC earlier the idea of disabling the errno warning
for the Sarge release.
I'd like to leave it in, but dormant by default - And ask aj to include
a bit in the release notes telling people how to check their systems.
Given Debian history, that gives them a year or so to come u
http://www.timeanddate.com/library/abbreviations/timezones/au/
Shows that 'EST' is in fact the most correct abbreviation for date to
return.
I'm tagging this bug as 'wontfix'.
--
In the United States, there isn't a government database that hasn't been
misused by the very people entrusted with k
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
> forwarded 89098 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#89098: shellutils: date cannot handle TZ=xxx+24
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
End of message, stoppi
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
> tags 149902 + wontfix
Bug#149902: date: does not understand some timezones
There were no tags set.
Tags added: wontfix
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact m
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
> owner 89098 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#89098: shellutils: date cannot handle TZ=xxx+24
Owner recorded as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me
I'm trying to figure out a way to make a testcase for this without
breaking my own system. (Hmm, what an ugly wishlist - per chroot
clocks.. but anyhow...)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/Programming/cvstree/libc/nss$ TZ=CST6CDT date
040200042001
date: cannot set date: Operation not permitted
Mon Apr 2 00:
SUSv3 says this about the TZ offset:
The hour shall be between zero and 24, and the minutes (and seconds)-if
present-between zero and 59.
glibc currently clips this range at 23 hours.
2003-12-20 Jeff Bailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* time/tzset.c: Allow TZ offsets up to 24 hours.
Index:
Your message dated Sat, 20 Dec 2003 23:19:02 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Closing this bug
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
I've built a testcase for looking at this. When I run it, I get:
./a.out
No match found! Errno: 0
Can you please provide a better testcase? Otherwise, I'll assume the
bug is fixed and close it (By the end of January or so)
--
In the United States, there isn't a government database that hasn
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
> tags 221317 + pending
Bug#221317: latex2html moved to non-free
Tags were: patch
Tags added: pending
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assis
Your message dated Sun, 21 Dec 2003 00:41:19 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Closing after lack of response
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your res
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 67921
Bug#67921: glob(3) doesn't treat \ correctly
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 68602
Bug#68602: glibc-doc: GLOB_PERIOD incorrectly documented
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator,
Repository: glibc-package/debian/debhelper.in
who:gotom
time: Sun Dec 21 10:01:53 MST 2003
Log Message:
- debian/local/etc_init.d/devpts.sh: rename to mountkernfs.
- debian/local/etc_init.d/mountkernfs: rename from devpts.sh, for
adding to mount tmpfs(shmfs) and sy
At Thu, 18 Dec 2003 17:22:49 -0500,
Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 18, 2003 at 06:39:13PM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> > On Dec 18, GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > >OK, I would like to rename from /etc/init.d/devpts.sh to
> > >/etc/init.d/mountfs, because (1) for example
On Sun, Dec 21, 2003 at 01:00:01AM -0500, Jeff Bailey wrote:
> Daniel mentioned on IRC earlier the idea of disabling the errno warning
> for the Sarge release.
>
> I'd like to leave it in, but dormant by default - And ask aj to include
> a bit in the release notes telling people how to check their
Repository: glibc-package/debian
who:gotom
time: Sun Dec 21 10:01:53 MST 2003
Log Message:
- debian/local/etc_init.d/devpts.sh: rename to mountkernfs.
- debian/local/etc_init.d/mountkernfs: rename from devpts.sh, for
adding to mount tmpfs(shmfs) and sysfs.
-
Repository: glibc-package/debian/local/etc_default
who:gotom
time: Sun Dec 21 10:01:53 MST 2003
Log Message:
- debian/local/etc_init.d/devpts.sh: rename to mountkernfs.
- debian/local/etc_init.d/mountkernfs: rename from devpts.sh, for
adding to mount tmpfs(shmfs) a
Your message dated Sun, 21 Dec 2003 16:05:36 -0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug
Repository: glibc-package/debian/local/etc_init.d
who:gotom
time: Sun Dec 21 10:01:53 MST 2003
Log Message:
- debian/local/etc_init.d/devpts.sh: rename to mountkernfs.
- debian/local/etc_init.d/mountkernfs: rename from devpts.sh, for
adding to mount tmpfs(shmfs) an
Your message dated Sun, 21 Dec 2003 10:13:28 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug
Your message dated Sun, 21 Dec 2003 12:29:17 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Closing this bug
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
severity 224366 wishlist
thanks
There are arguments for both sides - Having absolute links makes it
harder to mount remote systems (for use in cross-compilers), and harder
to work with chroots.
In any event, having /usr be a symlink is an unusual configuration (on
Linux, anyway... *g*), so I'm go
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 68602
Bug#68602: glibc-doc: GLOB_PERIOD incorrectly documented
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator,
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 67921
Bug#67921: glob(3) doesn't treat \ correctly
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs
reassign g++-3.2
thanks
Your simplified testcase doesn't involve glibc at all, reassigning to
g++-3.2
--
In the United States, there isn't a government database that hasn't been
misused by the very people entrusted with keeping its information safe.
- Bruce Schneier
signature.asc
Description:
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 224366 wishlist
Bug#224366: libc6-dev: .so symlinks point to nowhere
Severity set to `wishlist'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bug
Package: glibc
Version: 2.3.2.ds1-10
Tags: patch
Please find attached a patch by Thiemo Seufer, which allows building
java (in gcc-snapshot) on the mips platform. Guido Guenther will
forward the bug upstream.
#! /bin/sh -e
# All lines beginning with `# DP:' are a description of the patch.
# DP:
On Sun, Dec 21, 2003 at 02:40:01PM -0800, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> I have heard reports that building the same source on Debian woody (glibc
> 2.2.5-11.5 with 2.4 kernel headers) works, however. I am going to be
> testing this myself shortly. If it works, the cause is most likely
> somewhere in g
Your message dated Sun, 21 Dec 2003 12:20:44 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#92520: Testcase?
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibilit
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> I have just verified this myself. Building user-mode-linux
> 2.4.22-7um-1 on woody works fine (even when running on unstable), but
> building it on unstable does not.
Conversely, does a unstable-built UML run on woody?
> The one built on unstable randomly sees ENOSYS fr
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
> reassign 205728 g++-3.2
Bug#205728: libc6-dev: libc6-dev incompatible with libstdc++5-dev
Bug reassigned from package `libc6-dev' to `g++-3.2'.
>
End of message, stopping processin
severity 224207 wishlist
severity 224248 wishlist
tag 224207 +wontfix
tag 224248 +wontfix
thanks
The glibc DDs have discussed this a few times - We've chosen not to
support 2.4 systems patched to support NPTL.
Some of the reasons for this include:
1) Not supported by either upstream (which means
Package: locales
Version: 2.3.2.ds1-10
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
[ia]
Per favor adde le file de definition pro interlingua, juncte a iste
email.
[en]
Please add interlingua definition file, attached to this email.
--
Saluti,
Mardy
http://interlingua.altervista.org
comment_char %
escape_
On Sun, Dec 21, 2003 at 02:09:42PM -0500, Jeff Bailey wrote:
> severity 224366 wishlist
> thanks
>
> There are arguments for both sides - Having absolute links makes it
> harder to mount remote systems (for use in cross-compilers), and harder
> to work with chroots.
>
> In any event, having /usr
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 224207 wishlist
Bug#224207: libc6-i686: Doesn't work with kernel 2.4 + nptl patch
Bug#224248: libc6-i686: Doesn't work with kernel 2.4 + nptl patch
Severity set to `wishlist'.
> severity 224248 wishlist
Bug#224248: libc6-i686: Doesn't work wit
On Sun, Dec 21, 2003 at 02:09:42PM -0500, Jeff Bailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There are arguments for both sides - Having absolute links makes it
Keep in mind that it's easy to detect and fix at installation time
(symlinks pointing to nowhere just aren't going to work...), so there
shouldn't
On Sun, Dec 21, 2003 at 07:25:47PM -0500, Jeff Dike wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> > I have just verified this myself. Building user-mode-linux
> > 2.4.22-7um-1 on woody works fine (even when running on unstable), but
> > building it on unstable does not.
>
> Conversely, does a unstable-buil
At Mon, 22 Dec 2003 01:15:13 +0100 (CET),
Marco d'Itri wrote:
> In linux.debian.maint.glibc GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >I've commited this feature in order to mount both tmpfs and sysfs into
> >the latest debian glibc cvs just now. Please check it.
> What about adding this too?
On Sun, Dec 21, 2003 at 08:08:57PM -0800, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 21, 2003 at 07:25:47PM -0500, Jeff Dike wrote:
>
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> > > I have just verified this myself. Building user-mode-linux
> > > 2.4.22-7um-1 on woody works fine (even when running on unstable), but
>
78 matches
Mail list logo
