GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> If this bug is occured by kernel changes, then this bug should be
> reassigned to kernel-image-2.4.21-{sun4*,sparc*} package.
Nope, this bug occurred by libc6/gcc changes. It is masked/fixed by
using kernel 2.4.21, current libc6 is incompatible with all
Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Not a bug. Current gcc-3.2/gcc-3.3 on sparc is geared toward a default
> v8 hwmul target (e.g. real sun4m's and up). The reason being that the
> old v7/v8softmul was bringing performance down noticably (and I mean
> visually being able to measure small task
> If this bug is occured by kernel changes, then this bug should be
> reassigned to kernel-image-2.4.21-{sun4*,sparc*} package.
>
> debian-sparc people, do you know that 2.4.21 sparc kernel has incomplete
> trap routine? Bugs#203322 and #203324 say something about this:
>
> #203322: python2.2:
GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> If this bug is occured by kernel changes, then this bug should be
> reassigned to kernel-image-2.4.21-{sun4*,sparc*} package.
Nope, this bug occurred by libc6/gcc changes. It is masked/fixed by
using kernel 2.4.21, current libc6 is incompatible with all
Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Not a bug. Current gcc-3.2/gcc-3.3 on sparc is geared toward a default
> v8 hwmul target (e.g. real sun4m's and up). The reason being that the
> old v7/v8softmul was bringing performance down noticably (and I mean
> visually being able to measure small task
On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 09:08:15AM +0200, Harald Nordg?rd-Hansen wrote:
> Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Not a bug. Current gcc-3.2/gcc-3.3 on sparc is geared toward a default
> > v8 hwmul target (e.g. real sun4m's and up). The reason being that the
> > old v7/v8softmul was bringing pe
On Wed, 6 Aug 2003, Ben Collins wrote:
> Not a bug. Current gcc-3.2/gcc-3.3 on sparc is geared toward a default
> v8 hwmul target (e.g. real sun4m's and up). The reason being that the
> old v7/v8softmul was bringing performance down noticably (and I mean
> visually being able to measure small t
At Wed, 6 Aug 2003 10:27:00 -0400,
Ben Collins wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 09:08:15AM +0200, Harald Nordg?rd-Hansen wrote:
> > Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > Not a bug. Current gcc-3.2/gcc-3.3 on sparc is geared toward a default
> > > v8 hwmul target (e.g. real sun4m's and up).
Hi all,
due to a pure act of laziness on my part, I "forgot" to install locales along
with libc6. Since the install in question is a busy server, I'm afraid of
installing a newer libc6 (2.2.x -> 2.3.x) or of performing a downgrade
(2.2.15-14 -> 2.2.15-11.5).
Can I force the installation of local
Hi Matthias,
At Sun, 9 Mar 2003 08:26:52 +0100,
Matthias Klose wrote:
> Package: libc6-dev
> Version: 2.3.1
> Severity: grave
>
> Attached is a diff of a binutils built in unstable with gcc-2.95 and
> one built on yesterday's testing (still glibc-2.2.5). Although I
> cannot prove that other build
10 matches
Mail list logo
