cvs commit to glibc-package/debian/patches by jbailey

2003-07-18 Thread Debian GLibc CVS Master
Repository: glibc-package/debian/patches who:jbailey time: Fri Jul 18 02:44:02 MDT 2003 Log Message: - debian/patches/syslog-backrev.dpatch: New file Files: changed:0list added: syslog-backrev.dpatch -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject o

cvs commit to glibc-package/debian by jbailey

2003-07-18 Thread Debian GLibc CVS Master
Repository: glibc-package/debian who:jbailey time: Fri Jul 18 02:44:01 MDT 2003 Log Message: - debian/patches/syslog-backrev.dpatch: New file Files: changed:changelog -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAI

2.3.2-1 in experimental

2003-07-18 Thread Jeff Bailey
I have uploaded 2.3.2-1 in experimental. If you're going to build it on an arch for testing, please email here (and/or update the /topic on irc) Tks, Jeff Bailey -- Breathe into my hands, I'll cup them like a glass to drink from... - Tattle Tale -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processing of glibc_2.3.2-1_i386.changes

2003-07-18 Thread Archive Administrator
glibc_2.3.2-1_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: glibc_2.3.2-1.dsc glibc_2.3.2.orig.tar.gz glibc_2.3.2-1.diff.gz libc6_2.3.2-1_i386.deb libc-udeb_2.3.2-1_i386.udeb libc6-dev_2.3.2-1_i386.deb libc6-prof_2.3.2-1_i386.deb libc6-dbg_2.3.2-1_i386.deb

glibc override disparity

2003-07-18 Thread Debian Installer
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the override file for the following file(s): libc6-dbg_2.3.2-1_i386.deb: package says section is devel, override says libdevel. libc6-pic_2.3.2-1_i386.deb: package says section is devel, override says libdevel. libc6-prof_2.3.2-1_i386

glibc_2.3.2-1_i386.changes ACCEPTED

2003-07-18 Thread Debian Installer
Accepted: glibc-doc_2.3.2-1_all.deb to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc-doc_2.3.2-1_all.deb glibc_2.3.2-1.diff.gz to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc_2.3.2-1.diff.gz glibc_2.3.2-1.dsc to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc_2.3.2-1.dsc glibc_2.3.2.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc_2.3.2.orig.tar.gz libc-udeb_2.3.2-

Bug#199134: marked as done (libc6: ioperm() bug on some ARM targets)

2003-07-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 18 Jul 2003 05:17:47 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#199134: fixed in glibc 2.3.2-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#194791: marked as done (locales: ar_SD.ISO-8859-6...LC_MONETARY int_curr_symbol)

2003-07-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 18 Jul 2003 05:17:47 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#194791: fixed in glibc 2.3.2-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#193331: marked as done (libc6: [sparc] update error from testing to woody)

2003-07-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 18 Jul 2003 05:17:46 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#193331: fixed in glibc 2.3.2-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#193327: marked as done (libc6.1: IA64 umount needs to set second paramter for sys_umount)

2003-07-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 18 Jul 2003 05:17:46 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#193327: fixed in glibc 2.3.2-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#191295: marked as done (libc6-dev: malloc_stats() segfaults if you don't first allocate memory)

2003-07-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 18 Jul 2003 05:17:45 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#191295: fixed in glibc 2.3.2-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#193510: marked as done (locales: locale-gen breaks on es_EC.ISO-8859-1)

2003-07-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 18 Jul 2003 05:17:44 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#188159: fixed in glibc 2.3.2-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#193509: marked as done (locales: locale-gen breaks on es_EC.ISO-8859-1)

2003-07-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 18 Jul 2003 05:17:44 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#188159: fixed in glibc 2.3.2-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#193020: marked as done (locales: locale-gen breaks on es_EC.ISO-8859-1)

2003-07-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 18 Jul 2003 05:17:44 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#188159: fixed in glibc 2.3.2-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#187475: marked as done (libc6: regcomp triggers an infinite loop when given a particular (bogus) pattern)

2003-07-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 18 Jul 2003 05:17:44 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#187475: fixed in glibc 2.3.2-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#186654: marked as done (FW: IMPORTANT bug fix for setjmp()/getcontext())

2003-07-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 18 Jul 2003 05:17:44 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#186654: fixed in glibc 2.3.2-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#185924: marked as done (locale-gen breaks with POSIXLY_CORRECT)

2003-07-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 18 Jul 2003 05:17:44 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#185924: fixed in glibc 2.3.2-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#189854: marked as done (I still have /usr/doc/libc6 and /usr/doc/libc6-dev ..)

2003-07-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 18 Jul 2003 05:17:45 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#189854: fixed in glibc 2.3.2-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#185648: marked as done (libc6: sparc64 sysdep.h typo)

2003-07-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 18 Jul 2003 05:17:43 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#185648: fixed in glibc 2.3.2-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#181701: marked as done (libc6: sendmsg used incorrectly in sunrpc/svc_udp.c)

2003-07-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 18 Jul 2003 05:17:43 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#181701: fixed in glibc 2.3.2-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#173963: marked as done (locales: ar_SD.ISO-8859-6, sr_YU.ISO-8859-5@cyrillic, sr_YU.ISO-8859-2, zh_CN.UTF-8 broken)

2003-07-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 18 Jul 2003 05:17:43 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#173963: fixed in glibc 2.3.2-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#189879: marked as done (libc6: 2.5.68 changed the way devfs+devpts works)

2003-07-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 18 Jul 2003 05:17:45 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#189879: fixed in glibc 2.3.2-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#171695: marked as done (relocation errors at OOo with libc6 2.3.1)

2003-07-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 18 Jul 2003 05:17:43 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#171695: fixed in glibc 2.3.2-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#193508: marked as done (locales: locale-gen breaks on es_EC)

2003-07-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 18 Jul 2003 05:17:44 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#188159: fixed in glibc 2.3.2-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#160040: marked as done (locales: sr_YU.ISO-8859-2...LC_MONETARY error)

2003-07-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 18 Jul 2003 05:17:42 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#160040: fixed in glibc 2.3.2-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#186210: marked as done (libc6: tzdata2003a is available, please update)

2003-07-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 18 Jul 2003 05:17:44 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#186210: fixed in glibc 2.3.2-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#164638: marked as done (libc6-dev: SIOCSIFNAME needs to be added)

2003-07-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 18 Jul 2003 05:17:42 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#164638: fixed in glibc 2.3.2-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#183694: marked as done (problem of 32 bit uid or gid in glibc)

2003-07-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 18 Jul 2003 05:17:43 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#183694: fixed in glibc 2.3.2-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#158410: marked as done (libc6-dev should suggest manpages-dev)

2003-07-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 18 Jul 2003 05:17:42 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#158410: fixed in glibc 2.3.2-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#184172: marked as done (ntp: FTBFS on alpha)

2003-07-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 18 Jul 2003 05:17:43 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#182654: fixed in glibc 2.3.2-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#140788: marked as done (libc6: Incorrect timezone info for Estonia)

2003-07-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 18 Jul 2003 05:17:41 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#140788: fixed in glibc 2.3.2-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#115536: marked as done (shellutils: date display for de_DE is wrong)

2003-07-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 18 Jul 2003 05:17:41 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#115536: fixed in glibc 2.3.2-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#184696: marked as done (libc6: Outdated libc6 ? (problem with recent OpenOffice snapshots))

2003-07-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 18 Jul 2003 05:17:43 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#184696: fixed in glibc 2.3.2-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#167564: marked as done (Running Quake 3 Arena v1.32 installer results into segfaults on debian/unstable, while stable works ok.)

2003-07-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 18 Jul 2003 05:17:42 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#167564: fixed in glibc 2.3.2-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#108619: marked as done (random() declaration vs _USE_BSD feature macro)

2003-07-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 18 Jul 2003 05:17:41 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#108619: fixed in glibc 2.3.2-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#106254: marked as done (unistd.h, pthread.h declare pthread_atfork())

2003-07-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 18 Jul 2003 05:17:41 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#106254: fixed in glibc 2.3.2-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#117509: marked as done (locales: Message grammar)

2003-07-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 18 Jul 2003 05:17:41 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#117509: fixed in glibc 2.3.2-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#137020: marked as done (libc6-dev: Incorrect macro _FPU_SETCW in )

2003-07-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 18 Jul 2003 05:17:41 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#137020: fixed in glibc 2.3.2-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#153548: marked as done (generic cos gives wrong result for some operands)

2003-07-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 18 Jul 2003 05:17:42 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#153548: fixed in glibc 2.3.2-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#149862: marked as done (libc6: Timezone has changed in Estonia)

2003-07-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 18 Jul 2003 05:17:41 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#140788: fixed in glibc 2.3.2-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#157142: marked as done (libc6: O_DIRECT missing in ppc headers)

2003-07-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 18 Jul 2003 05:17:42 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#157142: fixed in glibc 2.3.2-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#157143: marked as done (libc6: Add missing O_DIRECT definition on ppc)

2003-07-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 18 Jul 2003 05:17:42 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#157142: fixed in glibc 2.3.2-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#164719: marked as done (Wrong timezone info for America/Sao_Paulo)

2003-07-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 18 Jul 2003 05:17:42 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#164719: fixed in glibc 2.3.2-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#166979: marked as done (Locales simply wont work)

2003-07-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 18 Jul 2003 05:17:42 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#166979: fixed in glibc 2.3.2-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#171022: marked as done (libc0.3: missing tmpfile64 function)

2003-07-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 18 Jul 2003 05:17:42 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#171022: fixed in glibc 2.3.2-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#182654: marked as done (glibc: glibc_2.3.1-14(alpha): ntp_adjtime not defined)

2003-07-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 18 Jul 2003 05:17:43 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#182654: fixed in glibc 2.3.2-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#181910: marked as done (libc6: Incorrect fall-back case in byteswap.h for i386)

2003-07-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 18 Jul 2003 05:17:43 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#181910: fixed in glibc 2.3.2-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#185342: marked as done (locales: generating ar_SD.ISO-8859-6... yields error)

2003-07-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 18 Jul 2003 05:17:43 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#185342: fixed in glibc 2.3.2-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#200386: marked as done (libc6: oracle does not install cause of a typo, fixed in 2.3.2)

2003-07-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 18 Jul 2003 05:17:47 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#200386: fixed in glibc 2.3.2-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#187142: marked as done (locales doesn't generate ar_SD.ISO-8859-6)

2003-07-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 18 Jul 2003 05:17:43 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#185342: fixed in glibc 2.3.2-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#192577: marked as done (libc-udeb should include libnss_dns and libresolv)

2003-07-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 18 Jul 2003 05:17:46 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#192577: fixed in glibc 2.3.2-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#185649: marked as done (libc6: conflicting sscanf prototype)

2003-07-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 18 Jul 2003 05:17:44 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#185649: fixed in glibc 2.3.2-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#192096: marked as done (openoffice.org-bin: relocation error)

2003-07-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 18 Jul 2003 05:17:46 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#192096: fixed in glibc 2.3.2-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#187621: marked as done (libc6: localedef -h: invalid option)

2003-07-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 18 Jul 2003 05:17:44 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#187621: fixed in glibc 2.3.2-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#190322: marked as done (Lithuania is in different time zone now (daylight saving rules apply))

2003-07-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 18 Jul 2003 05:17:45 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#190322: fixed in glibc 2.3.2-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#188159: marked as done (es_EC.ISO-8859-1...LC_MONETARY: Error during postinstall config => corrupt installation of package)

2003-07-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 18 Jul 2003 05:17:44 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#188159: fixed in glibc 2.3.2-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#188383: marked as done (libc6-sparc64 overwriting /lib/64 - )

2003-07-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 18 Jul 2003 05:17:44 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#188383: fixed in glibc 2.3.2-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#189792: marked as done (libc6: devpts.sh needs to mount devpts even on devfs > 2.5.68)

2003-07-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 18 Jul 2003 05:17:45 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#189792: fixed in glibc 2.3.2-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#190785: marked as done (locales: int_curr_symbol still a problem (2.3.1-17))

2003-07-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 18 Jul 2003 05:17:45 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#190785: fixed in glibc 2.3.2-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#191785: marked as done (initscripts: Add support for current 2.5 kernels)

2003-07-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 18 Jul 2003 05:17:45 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#191785: fixed in glibc 2.3.2-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#191952: marked as done (Bad version index computation in dl symbol resolution)

2003-07-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 18 Jul 2003 05:17:45 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#191952: fixed in glibc 2.3.2-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#193656: marked as done ([hppa] patch to fix funcptr for _start)

2003-07-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 18 Jul 2003 05:17:47 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#193656: fixed in glibc 2.3.2-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

cvs commit to glibc-package/debian/patches by gotom

2003-07-18 Thread Debian GLibc CVS Master
Repository: glibc-package/debian/patches who:gotom time: Fri Jul 18 09:48:46 MDT 2003 Log Message: - make 2.3.2-2 entry - glibc23-arm-waitpid.dpatch: Fix arm ld-linux failure due to sys_waitpid missing. Patched by Philip Blundell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Files: change

cvs commit to glibc-package/debian by gotom

2003-07-18 Thread Debian GLibc CVS Master
Repository: glibc-package/debian who:gotom time: Fri Jul 18 09:48:46 MDT 2003 Log Message: - make 2.3.2-2 entry - glibc23-arm-waitpid.dpatch: Fix arm ld-linux failure due to sys_waitpid missing. Patched by Philip Blundell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Files: changed:ch

Bug#111268: Svenska språknämnden is a preferrable authority for Swedish as a language

2003-07-18 Thread Göran Uddeborg
Keld Jørn Simonsen writes: > I think SIS - Sewdish Institute for Standardisation is also a preferable > source for Swedish Language, and especially when it comes to computers. You know what they say about standards: The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from.

Bug#111268: Svenska språknämnden is a preferrable authority for Swedish as a language

2003-07-18 Thread Göran Uddeborg
Mikael Hedin writes: > Anyway, should not d_t_fmt, t_fmt and date_fmt use the same format? Yes, obviously. > IFAICT the last one uses colons today, but the formet two uses full > stop. And what are their respective uses? I guess the answer is > buried in the sources, but anyway... While d_t_fm

glibc_2.3.2-1_powerpc.changes ACCEPTED

2003-07-18 Thread Debian Installer
Accepted: libc-udeb_2.3.2-1_powerpc.udeb to pool/main/g/glibc/libc-udeb_2.3.2-1_powerpc.udeb libc6-dbg_2.3.2-1_powerpc.deb to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-dbg_2.3.2-1_powerpc.deb libc6-dev_2.3.2-1_powerpc.deb to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-dev_2.3.2-1_powerpc.deb libc6-pic_2.3.2-1_powerpc.deb to po

Bug#111268: Svenska språknämnden is a preferrable authority for Swedish as a language

2003-07-18 Thread Keld Jørn Simonsen
On Fri, Jul 18, 2003 at 07:46:05PM +0200, Göran Uddeborg wrote: > Keld Jørn Simonsen writes: > > I think SIS - Sewdish Institute for Standardisation is also a preferable > > source for Swedish Language, and especially when it comes to computers. > > You know what they say about standards: The nice

Bug#111268: Svenska språknämnden is a preferrable authority for Swedish as a language

2003-07-18 Thread Göran Uddeborg
Keld Jørn Simonsen writes: > What I meant is that the specific standards overrules the more > general standards. The specification from SIS is directly addressed > towards POSIX locales, which is what we are talking about here, > while Svenska Språknämnden is more generic. Ok, I follow you now. >

Bug#202023: glibc-doc: rcmd/rcmd_af undocumented

2003-07-18 Thread herbert
Package: glibc-doc Version: 2.3.1-16 Severity: normal rcmd/rcmd_af needs to be documented. -- System Information Debian Release: testing/unstable Kernel Version: Linux gondolin 2.4.21-2-686-smp #1 SMP Sat Jul 5 01:42:22 EST 2003 i686 GNU/Linux -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] wi

cvs commit to glibc-package/debian/patches by jbailey

2003-07-18 Thread Debian GLibc CVS Master
Repository: glibc-package/debian/patches who:jbailey time: Fri Jul 18 02:44:02 MDT 2003 Log Message: - debian/patches/syslog-backrev.dpatch: New file Files: changed:0list added: syslog-backrev.dpatch

cvs commit to glibc-package/debian by jbailey

2003-07-18 Thread Debian GLibc CVS Master
Repository: glibc-package/debian who:jbailey time: Fri Jul 18 02:44:01 MDT 2003 Log Message: - debian/patches/syslog-backrev.dpatch: New file Files: changed:changelog

2.3.2-1 in experimental

2003-07-18 Thread Jeff Bailey
I have uploaded 2.3.2-1 in experimental. If you're going to build it on an arch for testing, please email here (and/or update the /topic on irc) Tks, Jeff Bailey -- Breathe into my hands, I'll cup them like a glass to drink from... - Tattle Tale

Processing of glibc_2.3.2-1_i386.changes

2003-07-18 Thread Archive Administrator
glibc_2.3.2-1_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: glibc_2.3.2-1.dsc glibc_2.3.2.orig.tar.gz glibc_2.3.2-1.diff.gz libc6_2.3.2-1_i386.deb libc-udeb_2.3.2-1_i386.udeb libc6-dev_2.3.2-1_i386.deb libc6-prof_2.3.2-1_i386.deb libc6-dbg_2.3.2-1_i386.deb

glibc override disparity

2003-07-18 Thread Debian Installer
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the override file for the following file(s): libc6-dbg_2.3.2-1_i386.deb: package says section is devel, override says libdevel. libc6-pic_2.3.2-1_i386.deb: package says section is devel, override says libdevel. libc6-prof_2.3.2-1_i3

glibc_2.3.2-1_i386.changes ACCEPTED

2003-07-18 Thread Debian Installer
Accepted: glibc-doc_2.3.2-1_all.deb to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc-doc_2.3.2-1_all.deb glibc_2.3.2-1.diff.gz to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc_2.3.2-1.diff.gz glibc_2.3.2-1.dsc to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc_2.3.2-1.dsc glibc_2.3.2.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc_2.3.2.orig.tar.gz libc-udeb_2.3.2-

Bug#199134: marked as done (libc6: ioperm() bug on some ARM targets)

2003-07-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 18 Jul 2003 05:17:47 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#199134: fixed in glibc 2.3.2-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#194791: marked as done (locales: ar_SD.ISO-8859-6...LC_MONETARY int_curr_symbol)

2003-07-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 18 Jul 2003 05:17:47 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#194791: fixed in glibc 2.3.2-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#193331: marked as done (libc6: [sparc] update error from testing to woody)

2003-07-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 18 Jul 2003 05:17:46 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#193331: fixed in glibc 2.3.2-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#193327: marked as done (libc6.1: IA64 umount needs to set second paramter for sys_umount)

2003-07-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 18 Jul 2003 05:17:46 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#193327: fixed in glibc 2.3.2-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#191295: marked as done (libc6-dev: malloc_stats() segfaults if you don't first allocate memory)

2003-07-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 18 Jul 2003 05:17:45 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#191295: fixed in glibc 2.3.2-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#193510: marked as done (locales: locale-gen breaks on es_EC.ISO-8859-1)

2003-07-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 18 Jul 2003 05:17:44 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#188159: fixed in glibc 2.3.2-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#193509: marked as done (locales: locale-gen breaks on es_EC.ISO-8859-1)

2003-07-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 18 Jul 2003 05:17:44 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#188159: fixed in glibc 2.3.2-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#193020: marked as done (locales: locale-gen breaks on es_EC.ISO-8859-1)

2003-07-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 18 Jul 2003 05:17:44 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#188159: fixed in glibc 2.3.2-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#187475: marked as done (libc6: regcomp triggers an infinite loop when given a particular (bogus) pattern)

2003-07-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 18 Jul 2003 05:17:44 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#187475: fixed in glibc 2.3.2-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#186654: marked as done (FW: IMPORTANT bug fix for setjmp()/getcontext())

2003-07-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 18 Jul 2003 05:17:44 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#186654: fixed in glibc 2.3.2-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#185924: marked as done (locale-gen breaks with POSIXLY_CORRECT)

2003-07-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 18 Jul 2003 05:17:44 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#185924: fixed in glibc 2.3.2-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#189854: marked as done (I still have /usr/doc/libc6 and /usr/doc/libc6-dev ..)

2003-07-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 18 Jul 2003 05:17:45 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#189854: fixed in glibc 2.3.2-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#185648: marked as done (libc6: sparc64 sysdep.h typo)

2003-07-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 18 Jul 2003 05:17:43 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#185648: fixed in glibc 2.3.2-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#181701: marked as done (libc6: sendmsg used incorrectly in sunrpc/svc_udp.c)

2003-07-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 18 Jul 2003 05:17:43 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#181701: fixed in glibc 2.3.2-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#173963: marked as done (locales: ar_SD.ISO-8859-6, sr_YU.ISO-8859-5@cyrillic, sr_YU.ISO-8859-2, zh_CN.UTF-8 broken)

2003-07-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 18 Jul 2003 05:17:43 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#173963: fixed in glibc 2.3.2-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#189879: marked as done (libc6: 2.5.68 changed the way devfs+devpts works)

2003-07-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 18 Jul 2003 05:17:45 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#189879: fixed in glibc 2.3.2-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#171695: marked as done (relocation errors at OOo with libc6 2.3.1)

2003-07-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 18 Jul 2003 05:17:43 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#171695: fixed in glibc 2.3.2-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#193508: marked as done (locales: locale-gen breaks on es_EC)

2003-07-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 18 Jul 2003 05:17:44 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#188159: fixed in glibc 2.3.2-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#160040: marked as done (locales: sr_YU.ISO-8859-2...LC_MONETARY error)

2003-07-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 18 Jul 2003 05:17:42 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#160040: fixed in glibc 2.3.2-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#186210: marked as done (libc6: tzdata2003a is available, please update)

2003-07-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 18 Jul 2003 05:17:44 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#186210: fixed in glibc 2.3.2-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#164638: marked as done (libc6-dev: SIOCSIFNAME needs to be added)

2003-07-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 18 Jul 2003 05:17:42 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#164638: fixed in glibc 2.3.2-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#183694: marked as done (problem of 32 bit uid or gid in glibc)

2003-07-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 18 Jul 2003 05:17:43 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#183694: fixed in glibc 2.3.2-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#158410: marked as done (libc6-dev should suggest manpages-dev)

2003-07-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 18 Jul 2003 05:17:42 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#158410: fixed in glibc 2.3.2-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#184172: marked as done (ntp: FTBFS on alpha)

2003-07-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 18 Jul 2003 05:17:43 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#182654: fixed in glibc 2.3.2-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

  1   2   >