Your message dated Thu, 02 Jan 2003 15:29:02 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line libc6: msync() succeeds on locked pages
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Thu, 02 Jan 2003 15:32:11 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line libc6: msync with flags = MS_SYNC|MS_ASYNC succeeds
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the ca
> On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 01:48:18PM +0200, Guus Sliepen wrote:
> > The following lets me believe the POSIX regex function breakage has
> > nothing to do with locales:
> [...]
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]>LANG= LC_ALL= man -k syscall
> > afs_syscall (2) - unimplemented system calls
> > nfsservctl (2)
Your message dated Thu, 02 Jan 2003 15:55:23 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line glibc bug: sysconf(_SC_NPROCESSORS_CONF) mis-parses
v2.4.19rc3ac3 /proc/cpuinfo
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been deal
Repository: glibc-package/debian
who:gotom
time: Thu Jan 2 00:23:00 MST 2003
Log Message:
Removed Closes: #16, because this bug report is for both
glibc-doc and manpages. It can be fixed in -9 to reassign
manpages.
Files:
changed:changelog
Your message dated Thu, 02 Jan 2003 16:13:23 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#168234: libc6: Package doesn't try to restart services on
downgrade
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
Your message dated Thu, 02 Jan 2003 16:25:54 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#167801: Sorry, false alert due to dselect misconfiguration
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
Repository: glibc-package/debian
who:gotom
time: Thu Jan 2 01:12:31 MST 2003
Log Message:
- debian/libc/DEBIAN/postinst: Removed 'logind' from checking list
because it does not exist.
- debian/libc/DEBIAN/postinst: Replaced dpkg -s from apache2 to
apache2-
Repository: glibc-package/debian/libc/DEBIAN
who:gotom
time: Thu Jan 2 01:12:31 MST 2003
Log Message:
- debian/libc/DEBIAN/postinst: Removed 'logind' from checking list
because it does not exist.
- debian/libc/DEBIAN/postinst: Replaced dpkg -s from apache2 to
Repository: glibc-package/debian
who:gotom
time: Thu Jan 2 01:16:44 MST 2003
Log Message:
- debian/libc/DEBIAN/postinst: Message typo fixed as "successfully."
(Closes: #168483)
Files:
changed:changelog
Repository: glibc-package/debian/libc/DEBIAN
who:gotom
time: Thu Jan 2 01:16:44 MST 2003
Log Message:
- debian/libc/DEBIAN/postinst: Message typo fixed as "successfully."
(Closes: #168483)
Files:
changed:postinst
At Fri, 08 Nov 2002 12:21:27 +0800,
Rex Tsai wrote:
> In the zh_TW locale, the "abday" and "day" fields contain too
> many characters (2 and 3, respectively). This may result to some
> strange displaying when using the related utilities under this
> locale (e.g., cal, see #160282).
>
> For exampl
Your message dated Thu, 02 Jan 2003 17:30:15 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#168246: locales: Patch of LC_TIME of zh_TW locale
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Repository: glibc-package/debian
who:gotom
time: Thu Jan 2 02:18:49 MST 2003
Log Message:
- debian/manpages/ldd.1: Updated newer version which is pulled from
RedHat manpages.
Files:
changed:changelog
Repository: glibc-package/debian/manpages
who:gotom
time: Thu Jan 2 02:18:49 MST 2003
Log Message:
- debian/manpages/ldd.1: Updated newer version which is pulled from
RedHat manpages.
Files:
changed:ldd.1
At Tue, 19 Nov 2002 13:03:26 -0600,
Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> > reassign 169784 libc6
> Bug#169784: Problem while installing libc6 2.3.1-4
> Bug reassigned from package `libc6-2.3.1-4' to `libc6'.
> While post-installing this package, an error occurs if apache2 is not
> installed.
> In
At Fri, 29 Nov 2002 11:50:38 +0100,
Chris Halls wrote:
> The ldd manpage seems to be out of date, and does not include
> doucmentation for the LD_DEBUG variable, among others. Many manpages on
> the web have this extra information. For example,
> http://unixhelp.ed.ac.uk/CGI/man-cgi?ld.so+8
I fo
At Fri, 29 Nov 2002 11:01:46 -0800,
Randolph Chung wrote:
> # nscd
> Segmentation fault (core dumped)
>
> # gdb /usr/sbin/nscd ./core
> GNU gdb 5.2.90_2002-11-20-cvs-debian
> Copyright 2002 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
> GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you ar
Is this bug still alive?
I think 2.3.1-8 fixes your problem. Would you tell me it's ok or not?
Regards,
-- gotom
At Tue, 29 Oct 2002 18:53:42 -0300,
Juan Linietsky wrote:
> ii libc6 [glibc-2.3.1-3] 2.3.1-3GNU C Library: Shared libraries
> an
>
> -- debconf information:
> * locales/
Your message dated Thu, 02 Jan 2003 18:35:18 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Processed: reassign 169784 to libc6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
At Mon, 11 Nov 2002 18:35:04 +0100,
Tobias Gabriel Benedikt Koelsch wrote:
> apt-build does not compile libc6 on my testing, because it can't get
> dpkg 1.10.8 . But when I change the Build-Depends line manually, it
> doesn't cause any packaging problems. So, I guess there could just be
> dpkg 1.1
On Thu, Jan 02, 2003 at 03:41:01PM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote:
> BTW, the original bug is still alive? I want you to check.
> If this bug does not occur, it should be closed.
At least man doesn't segfault anymore :).
--
Met vriendelijke groet / with kind regards,
Guus Sliepen <[EMAIL PROTE
If anybody wants to maintain this package please step forward.
Known problems:
- build-depends should be versioned
- one element of the testsuite has been disabled because it fails when
built out of the tree and I haven't been able to fix it
The red hat package builds /sbin/prelink as a static
Package: libc6
Version: 2.3.1-8
sys/sysmacros.h seems to use different method to determine if dev_t is
unsigned long long or an array type than the actual dev_t declaration.
Here's a test program that fails with tcc (included with Debian):
#include
#include
#include
int main(int argc, char *a
Package: libc6
sys/sysmacros.h seems to use different method to determine if dev_t is
unsigned long long or an array type than the actual dev_t declaration.
Here's a test program that fails with tcc (included with Debian):
#include
#include
#include
int main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
On Thu, 2003-01-02 at 13:08, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> Would it be appropriate to file bugs against packages which fail
> prelinking? Does anybody understand what's wrong with many gnome
> libraries (it complains about a undefined weak symbol).
What's the actual error you see? If it's the warning abo
On Thu, 2003-01-02 at 15:49, Ben Collins wrote:
> > sys/sysmacros.h seems to use different method to determine if dev_t is
> > unsigned long long or an array type than the actual dev_t declaration.
> > Here's a test program that fails with tcc (included with Debian):
> >
> > #include
> > #include
On Thu, Jan 02, 2003 at 03:23:33PM +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> Package: libc6
>
> sys/sysmacros.h seems to use different method to determine if dev_t is
> unsigned long long or an array type than the actual dev_t declaration.
> Here's a test program that fails with tcc (included with Debian):
>
Your message dated Thu, 2 Jan 2003 08:50:39 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#175027: dev_t problems with non-gcc compilers
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
On Jan 02, Philip Blundell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Would it be appropriate to file bugs against packages which fail
>> prelinking? Does anybody understand what's wrong with many gnome
>> libraries (it complains about a undefined weak symbol).
>What's the actual error you see? If it's th
On Thu, 2003-01-02 at 14:01, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> How can it be fixed? Do you mean that the library needs to be explicitly
> linked against other libraries?
Yes. For example, if you use functions from libXpm, you need to link
with -lXpm rather than just assuming it will be dragged in by some oth
On Thu, Jan 02, 2003 at 03:56:14PM +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Thu, 2003-01-02 at 15:49, Ben Collins wrote:
> > > sys/sysmacros.h seems to use different method to determine if dev_t is
> > > unsigned long long or an array type than the actual dev_t declaration.
> > > Here's a test program that
On Thu, 2003-01-02 at 16:07, Ben Collins wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 02, 2003 at 03:56:14PM +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> > On Thu, 2003-01-02 at 15:49, Ben Collins wrote:
> > > > sys/sysmacros.h seems to use different method to determine if dev_t is
> > > > unsigned long long or an array type than the ac
Repository: glibc-package/debian/locales/usr/sbin
who:gotom
time: Thu Jan 2 07:59:32 MST 2003
Log Message:
- debian/locales/usr/sbin/locale-gen: add '-A /etc/locale.alias' into
localedef option to consult locale alias name when making archives.
(Closes: #174253)
Repository: glibc-package/debian
who:gotom
time: Thu Jan 2 07:59:32 MST 2003
Log Message:
- debian/locales/usr/sbin/locale-gen: add '-A /etc/locale.alias' into
localedef option to consult locale alias name when making archives.
(Closes: #174253)
Files:
chang
Repository: glibc-package/debian
who:gotom
time: Thu Jan 2 08:05:15 MST 2003
Log Message:
Remove Closes: because this bug is not resolved with some locale settings.
Files:
changed:changelog
> Well, I see it the other way :) Using the __GNUC__ macros from
> sysmacros.h makes it work. dev_t declarations seems to be:
>
> // bits/types.h
> typedef __DEV_T_TYPE __dev_t; /* Type of device numbers. */
>
> // bits/typesizes.h
> #define __DEV_T_TYPE __UQUAD_TYPE
>
> // bits/types.
On Thu, 2003-01-02 at 18:09, Ben Collins wrote:
> > // bits/types.h
> > typedef __DEV_T_TYPE __dev_t; /* Type of device numbers. */
> Unless something drastic changed between 2.3.1-5 and 2.3.1-8, your
> headers are broken. I show this:
>
> typedef __u_quad_t __dev_t; /* Type of
Repository: glibc-package/debian/patches
who:dan
time: Thu Jan 2 10:02:34 MST 2003
Log Message:
- debian/patches/glibc23-errno.dpatch: Updated for "h_errno" and "_res"
also.
- Upload properly this time, with a .diff.gz (Closes: #174436).
Files:
changed:gli
Repository: glibc-package/debian
who:dan
time: Thu Jan 2 10:02:34 MST 2003
Log Message:
- debian/patches/glibc23-errno.dpatch: Updated for "h_errno" and "_res"
also.
- Upload properly this time, with a .diff.gz (Closes: #174436).
Files:
changed:changelog
On Thu, Jan 02, 2003 at 06:31:13PM +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Thu, 2003-01-02 at 18:09, Ben Collins wrote:
> > > // bits/types.h
> > > typedef __DEV_T_TYPE __dev_t; /* Type of device numbers. */
>
> > Unless something drastic changed between 2.3.1-5 and 2.3.1-8, your
> > headers are bro
At Tue, 24 Dec 2002 13:54:59 +0100,
Morten Brix Pedersen wrote:
> The idea with having the user select his/her own locale is great. But
> for newcomers to Linux, the locale names aren't really understandable.
>
> So it would be excellent if the language name of the locale could be
> spelled out ne
At Tue, 31 Dec 2002 15:27:52 -0500 (EST),
Mark Eichin wrote:
> Actually, the libc6 upgrade breaks ssh-krb5 with exactly the same
> log. Restarting ssh-krb5 fixes it, but that doesn't get done
> automatically; perhaps this libc needs a resurrection of the "some
> services need restarting" postinst.
Hi,
* GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-01-02 20:32:59]:
> I propose we use it for "title" entry in localedata/locales/* files.
> For example,
>
>
> Danish locale for Denmark da_DK ISO-8859-1
> Spanish locale for S
http://www.cn60.com
http://www.cn60.com
http://www.cn60.com
http://www.cn60.com
http://www.cn60.com
http://www.cn60.com
（如果这封邮件打扰您了，我们向您表示歉意并请随手删除。谢谢！）
http://www.cn60.com
http://www.cn60.com
http://www.cn60.com
http://www.cn60.com
http://www.cn60.com
http://www.cn60.com
（如果这封邮件打扰您了，我们向您表示歉意并请随手删除。谢谢！）
$B#C#G(B/$B2hA|$r([EMAIL PROTECTED]<}O?$7$?#C#D$,(B1$BK|1_!*(B
(Bhttp://adult.csx.jp/~fetish226/index.htm
(BMessage-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
(B
$B!|%"%K%a(BCG$B!|%U%'%A2hA|!|%l%$%W2hA|!|(BFLASH$BF02h!|%-%c%W%A%c!<2hA|(B
$B!|393Q%U%'%A2hA|!|F1?M%3%_%C%/!|6;%A%i2hA|!|%"%$%I%k$*Ju!|%3%
http://www.cn60.com
http://www.cn60.com
http://www.cn60.com
http://www.cn60.com
http://www.cn60.com
http://www.cn60.com
（如果这封邮件打扰您了，我们向您表示歉意并请随手删除。谢谢！）
http://www.cn60.com
http://www.cn60.com
http://www.cn60.com
http://www.cn60.com
http://www.cn60.com
http://www.cn60.com
（如果这封邮件打扰您了，我们向您表示歉意并请随手删除。谢谢！）
Repository: glibc-package/debian
who:gotom
time: Thu Jan 2 01:12:31 MST 2003
Log Message:
- debian/libc/DEBIAN/postinst: Removed 'logind' from checking list
because it does not exist.
- debian/libc/DEBIAN/postinst: Replaced dpkg -s from apache2 to
apache2-
Repository: glibc-package/debian/libc/DEBIAN
who:gotom
time: Thu Jan 2 01:12:31 MST 2003
Log Message:
- debian/libc/DEBIAN/postinst: Removed 'logind' from checking list
because it does not exist.
- debian/libc/DEBIAN/postinst: Replaced dpkg -s from apache2 to
Repository: glibc-package/debian
who:gotom
time: Thu Jan 2 01:16:44 MST 2003
Log Message:
- debian/libc/DEBIAN/postinst: Message typo fixed as "successfully."
(Closes: #168483)
Files:
changed:changelog
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subj
Repository: glibc-package/debian/libc/DEBIAN
who:gotom
time: Thu Jan 2 01:16:44 MST 2003
Log Message:
- debian/libc/DEBIAN/postinst: Message typo fixed as "successfully."
(Closes: #168483)
Files:
changed:postinst
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
At Fri, 08 Nov 2002 12:21:27 +0800,
Rex Tsai wrote:
> In the zh_TW locale, the "abday" and "day" fields contain too
> many characters (2 and 3, respectively). This may result to some
> strange displaying when using the related utilities under this
> locale (e.g., cal, see #160282).
>
> For exampl
Your message dated Thu, 02 Jan 2003 17:30:15 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#168246: locales: Patch of LC_TIME of zh_TW locale
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Repository: glibc-package/debian
who:gotom
time: Thu Jan 2 02:18:49 MST 2003
Log Message:
- debian/manpages/ldd.1: Updated newer version which is pulled from
RedHat manpages.
Files:
changed:changelog
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a sub
Repository: glibc-package/debian/manpages
who:gotom
time: Thu Jan 2 02:18:49 MST 2003
Log Message:
- debian/manpages/ldd.1: Updated newer version which is pulled from
RedHat manpages.
Files:
changed:ldd.1
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with
At Tue, 19 Nov 2002 13:03:26 -0600,
Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> > reassign 169784 libc6
> Bug#169784: Problem while installing libc6 2.3.1-4
> Bug reassigned from package `libc6-2.3.1-4' to `libc6'.
> While post-installing this package, an error occurs if apache2 is not installed.
> In pos
At Fri, 29 Nov 2002 11:50:38 +0100,
Chris Halls wrote:
> The ldd manpage seems to be out of date, and does not include
> doucmentation for the LD_DEBUG variable, among others. Many manpages on
> the web have this extra information. For example,
> http://unixhelp.ed.ac.uk/CGI/man-cgi?ld.so+8
I fo
At Fri, 29 Nov 2002 11:01:46 -0800,
Randolph Chung wrote:
> # nscd
> Segmentation fault (core dumped)
>
> # gdb /usr/sbin/nscd ./core
> GNU gdb 5.2.90_2002-11-20-cvs-debian
> Copyright 2002 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
> GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you ar
Is this bug still alive?
I think 2.3.1-8 fixes your problem. Would you tell me it's ok or not?
Regards,
-- gotom
At Tue, 29 Oct 2002 18:53:42 -0300,
Juan Linietsky wrote:
> ii libc6 [glibc-2.3.1-3] 2.3.1-3GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
>
> -- debconf information:
> * locales/def
Your message dated Thu, 02 Jan 2003 18:35:18 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Processed: reassign 169784 to libc6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
At Mon, 11 Nov 2002 18:35:04 +0100,
Tobias Gabriel Benedikt Koelsch wrote:
> apt-build does not compile libc6 on my testing, because it can't get
> dpkg 1.10.8 . But when I change the Build-Depends line manually, it
> doesn't cause any packaging problems. So, I guess there could just be
> dpkg 1.1
On Thu, Jan 02, 2003 at 03:41:01PM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote:
> BTW, the original bug is still alive? I want you to check.
> If this bug does not occur, it should be closed.
At least man doesn't segfault anymore :).
--
Met vriendelijke groet / with kind regards,
Guus Sliepen <[EMAIL PROTE
If anybody wants to maintain this package please step forward.
Known problems:
- build-depends should be versioned
- one element of the testsuite has been disabled because it fails when
built out of the tree and I haven't been able to fix it
The red hat package builds /sbin/prelink as a static
Package: libc6
Version: 2.3.1-8
sys/sysmacros.h seems to use different method to determine if dev_t is
unsigned long long or an array type than the actual dev_t declaration.
Here's a test program that fails with tcc (included with Debian):
#include
#include
#include
int main(int argc, char *a
Package: libc6
sys/sysmacros.h seems to use different method to determine if dev_t is
unsigned long long or an array type than the actual dev_t declaration.
Here's a test program that fails with tcc (included with Debian):
#include
#include
#include
int main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
On Thu, 2003-01-02 at 13:08, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> Would it be appropriate to file bugs against packages which fail
> prelinking? Does anybody understand what's wrong with many gnome
> libraries (it complains about a undefined weak symbol).
What's the actual error you see? If it's the warning abo
On Thu, 2003-01-02 at 15:49, Ben Collins wrote:
> > sys/sysmacros.h seems to use different method to determine if dev_t is
> > unsigned long long or an array type than the actual dev_t declaration.
> > Here's a test program that fails with tcc (included with Debian):
> >
> > #include
> > #include
On Thu, Jan 02, 2003 at 03:23:33PM +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> Package: libc6
>
> sys/sysmacros.h seems to use different method to determine if dev_t is
> unsigned long long or an array type than the actual dev_t declaration.
> Here's a test program that fails with tcc (included with Debian):
>
Your message dated Thu, 2 Jan 2003 08:50:39 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#175027: dev_t problems with non-gcc compilers
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
On Jan 02, Philip Blundell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Would it be appropriate to file bugs against packages which fail
>> prelinking? Does anybody understand what's wrong with many gnome
>> libraries (it complains about a undefined weak symbol).
>What's the actual error you see? If it's th
On Thu, 2003-01-02 at 14:01, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> How can it be fixed? Do you mean that the library needs to be explicitly
> linked against other libraries?
Yes. For example, if you use functions from libXpm, you need to link
with -lXpm rather than just assuming it will be dragged in by some oth
On Thu, Jan 02, 2003 at 03:56:14PM +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Thu, 2003-01-02 at 15:49, Ben Collins wrote:
> > > sys/sysmacros.h seems to use different method to determine if dev_t is
> > > unsigned long long or an array type than the actual dev_t declaration.
> > > Here's a test program that
On Thu, 2003-01-02 at 16:07, Ben Collins wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 02, 2003 at 03:56:14PM +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> > On Thu, 2003-01-02 at 15:49, Ben Collins wrote:
> > > > sys/sysmacros.h seems to use different method to determine if dev_t is
> > > > unsigned long long or an array type than the ac
Repository: glibc-package/debian/locales/usr/sbin
who:gotom
time: Thu Jan 2 07:59:32 MST 2003
Log Message:
- debian/locales/usr/sbin/locale-gen: add '-A /etc/locale.alias' into
localedef option to consult locale alias name when making archives.
(Closes: #174253)
Repository: glibc-package/debian
who:gotom
time: Thu Jan 2 07:59:32 MST 2003
Log Message:
- debian/locales/usr/sbin/locale-gen: add '-A /etc/locale.alias' into
localedef option to consult locale alias name when making archives.
(Closes: #174253)
Files:
chang
Repository: glibc-package/debian
who:gotom
time: Thu Jan 2 08:05:15 MST 2003
Log Message:
Remove Closes: because this bug is not resolved with some locale settings.
Files:
changed:changelog
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Tr
> Well, I see it the other way :) Using the __GNUC__ macros from
> sysmacros.h makes it work. dev_t declarations seems to be:
>
> // bits/types.h
> typedef __DEV_T_TYPE __dev_t; /* Type of device numbers. */
>
> // bits/typesizes.h
> #define __DEV_T_TYPE __UQUAD_TYPE
>
> // bits/types.
On Thu, 2003-01-02 at 18:09, Ben Collins wrote:
> > // bits/types.h
> > typedef __DEV_T_TYPE __dev_t; /* Type of device numbers. */
> Unless something drastic changed between 2.3.1-5 and 2.3.1-8, your
> headers are broken. I show this:
>
> typedef __u_quad_t __dev_t; /* Type of
Repository: glibc-package/debian/patches
who:dan
time: Thu Jan 2 10:02:34 MST 2003
Log Message:
- debian/patches/glibc23-errno.dpatch: Updated for "h_errno" and "_res"
also.
- Upload properly this time, with a .diff.gz (Closes: #174436).
Files:
changed:gli
Repository: glibc-package/debian
who:dan
time: Thu Jan 2 10:02:34 MST 2003
Log Message:
- debian/patches/glibc23-errno.dpatch: Updated for "h_errno" and "_res"
also.
- Upload properly this time, with a .diff.gz (Closes: #174436).
Files:
changed:changelog
On Thu, Jan 02, 2003 at 06:31:13PM +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Thu, 2003-01-02 at 18:09, Ben Collins wrote:
> > > // bits/types.h
> > > typedef __DEV_T_TYPE __dev_t; /* Type of device numbers. */
>
> > Unless something drastic changed between 2.3.1-5 and 2.3.1-8, your
> > headers are bro
At Tue, 24 Dec 2002 13:54:59 +0100,
Morten Brix Pedersen wrote:
> The idea with having the user select his/her own locale is great. But
> for newcomers to Linux, the locale names aren't really understandable.
>
> So it would be excellent if the language name of the locale could be
> spelled out ne
At Tue, 31 Dec 2002 15:27:52 -0500 (EST),
Mark Eichin wrote:
> Actually, the libc6 upgrade breaks ssh-krb5 with exactly the same
> log. Restarting ssh-krb5 fixes it, but that doesn't get done
> automatically; perhaps this libc needs a resurrection of the "some
> services need restarting" postinst.
Hi,
* GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-01-02 20:32:59]:
> I propose we use it for "title" entry in localedata/locales/* files.
> For example,
>
>
> Danish locale for Denmark da_DK ISO-8859-1
> Spanish locale for S
http://www.cn60.com
http://www.cn60.com
http://www.cn60.com
http://www.cn60.com
http://www.cn60.com
http://www.cn60.com
£¨Èç¹ûÕâ·âÓʼþ´òÈÅÄúÁË£¬ÎÒÃÇÏòÄú±íʾǸÒâ²¢ÇëËæÊÖɾ³ý¡£Ð»Ð»£¡£©
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECT
http://www.cn60.com
http://www.cn60.com
http://www.cn60.com
http://www.cn60.com
http://www.cn60.com
http://www.cn60.com
£¨Èç¹ûÕâ·âÓʼþ´òÈÅÄúÁË£¬ÎÒÃÇÏòÄú±íʾǸÒâ²¢ÇëËæÊÖɾ³ý¡£Ð»Ð»£¡£©
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECT
$B#C#G(B/$B2hA|$r(B2$B@iKg$b<}O?$7$?#C#D$,(B1$BK|1_!*(B
(Bhttp://adult.csx.jp/~fetish226/index.htm
(BMessage-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
(B
$B!|%"%K%a(BCG$B!|%U%'%A2hA|!|%l%$%W2hA|!|(BFLASH$BF02h!|%-%c%W%A%c!<2hA|(B
$B!|393Q%U%'%A2hA|!|F1?M%3%_%C%/!|6;%A%i2hA|!|%"%$%I%k$*Ju!|%3%9%W%l
> I don't have IEEE754 and ANSI floating point issue, so I don't know
> whether ANSI defines this behavior or not. If you have IEEE754 or any
> related standards, and if such standards say pow(NaN, 0) have to
> return NaN, reopen this bug.
C99 draft standard (last freely available version, see
ht
http://www.cn60.com
http://www.cn60.com
http://www.cn60.com
http://www.cn60.com
http://www.cn60.com
http://www.cn60.com
£¨Èç¹ûÕâ·âÓʼþ´òÈÅÄúÁË£¬ÎÒÃÇÏòÄú±íʾǸÒâ²¢ÇëËæÊÖɾ³ý¡£Ð»Ð»£¡£©
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECT
http://www.cn60.com
http://www.cn60.com
http://www.cn60.com
http://www.cn60.com
http://www.cn60.com
http://www.cn60.com
£¨Èç¹ûÕâ·âÓʼþ´òÈÅÄúÁË£¬ÎÒÃÇÏòÄú±íʾǸÒâ²¢ÇëËæÊÖɾ³ý¡£Ð»Ð»£¡£©
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECT
92 matches
Mail list logo
