PA'ers,
Comments or thoughts about the following issues would be appreciated.
These items are taken from my collection of TODO notes for glibc,
and were recently added by comments from Helge and Willy.
- Implement make/swap/set/get/context() calls in glibc
= Don't know what's needed...
> 3- sizeof(long double) is incorrect in gcc and glibc (?)
This also needs to be fixed under 64-bit hpux. Need to determine
the calling convention for long doubles.
Dave
--
J. David Anglin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
National Research Council of Canada (613)
Package: libc6-dev
Version: 2.2.5-14
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Hello,
Looking at paths.h:
/* Default search path. */
#define _PATH_DEFPATH "/usr/bin:/bin"
/* All standard utilities path. */
#define _PATH_STDPATH \
"/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/sbin"
This is suposed to contain the "def
Drepper posted an email[0] yesterday indicating that 2.3 is imminent.
To help with this transition, I will cook up some i386 packages based
on 2.3 for some initial QA.
Should I upload them to experimental, or should I just post them in
people.d.o/~jbailey/?
Note that I already know that hurd-i38
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 08:49:21PM -0700, Jeff Bailey wrote:
> Drepper posted an email[0] yesterday indicating that 2.3 is imminent.
> To help with this transition, I will cook up some i386 packages based
> on 2.3 for some initial QA.
>
> Should I upload them to experimental, or should I just pos
Package: libc6
Severity: wishlist
Priority: high, pretty please, with sugar on top.
Debian-installer will need an udeb with the full libc6.so in it. (It
doesn't need to have any old symbols -- actually, it would be nice if
it didn't have old symbols, because of the size issue). (See
debian-ins
6 matches
Mail list logo
