Re: Insight into building glibc with gcc-3.0

2001-06-07 Thread Mark Kettenis
Gordon Sadler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Basically, "glibc will have to be updated for GCC 3.0" It will have to be updated anyway. There are some serious problems with exception handling. Recompiling glibc will result in a libc.so that doesn't export __frame_start_for. This means that excep

Re: Insight into building glibc with gcc-3.0

2001-06-05 Thread Mark Kettenis
Gordon Sadler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Basically, "glibc will have to be updated for GCC 3.0" It will have to be updated anyway. There are some serious problems with exception handling. Recompiling glibc will result in a libc.so that doesn't export __frame_start_for. This means that exce

Re: Insight into building glibc with gcc-3.0

2001-06-04 Thread Ben Collins
On Mon, Jun 04, 2001 at 02:07:41AM -0400, Ben Collins wrote: > On Sun, Jun 03, 2001 at 04:19:21PM -0500, Gordon Sadler wrote: > > I've conducted some tests building glibc-2.2.3+nis patch with gcc-2.95-4 > > from Debian unstable and some local builds of gcc-3.0. After reading > > some archives of th

Re: Insight into building glibc with gcc-3.0

2001-06-04 Thread Ben Collins
On Sun, Jun 03, 2001 at 04:19:21PM -0500, Gordon Sadler wrote: > I've conducted some tests building glibc-2.2.3+nis patch with gcc-2.95-4 > from Debian unstable and some local builds of gcc-3.0. After reading > some archives of the glibc mailing lists, I discovered some oddities on > the build proc

Re: Insight into building glibc with gcc-3.0

2001-06-03 Thread Ben Collins
On Mon, Jun 04, 2001 at 02:07:41AM -0400, Ben Collins wrote: > On Sun, Jun 03, 2001 at 04:19:21PM -0500, Gordon Sadler wrote: > > I've conducted some tests building glibc-2.2.3+nis patch with gcc-2.95-4 > > from Debian unstable and some local builds of gcc-3.0. After reading > > some archives of t

Re: Insight into building glibc with gcc-3.0

2001-06-03 Thread Ben Collins
On Sun, Jun 03, 2001 at 04:19:21PM -0500, Gordon Sadler wrote: > I've conducted some tests building glibc-2.2.3+nis patch with gcc-2.95-4 > from Debian unstable and some local builds of gcc-3.0. After reading > some archives of the glibc mailing lists, I discovered some oddities on > the build pro

Insight into building glibc with gcc-3.0

2001-06-03 Thread Gordon Sadler
I've conducted some tests building glibc-2.2.3+nis patch with gcc-2.95-4 from Debian unstable and some local builds of gcc-3.0. After reading some archives of the glibc mailing lists, I discovered some oddities on the build process. glibc uses `gcc -print-file-name=cpp` while building parts of the

Insight into building glibc with gcc-3.0

2001-06-03 Thread Gordon Sadler
I've conducted some tests building glibc-2.2.3+nis patch with gcc-2.95-4 from Debian unstable and some local builds of gcc-3.0. After reading some archives of the glibc mailing lists, I discovered some oddities on the build process. glibc uses `gcc -print-file-name=cpp` while building parts of th