At Fri, 1 Oct 2004 14:10:09 -0700,
Tom Rini wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 26, 2004 at 02:02:59PM -0700, Tom Rini wrote:
>
> > Hmmm.. How many of these #includes (or
> > #else's them in) does glibc (or really, any non-kernel user) need?
> > Would someone have the time to try casing all of these inside of
On Sun, Sep 26, 2004 at 02:02:59PM -0700, Tom Rini wrote:
> Hmmm.. How many of these #includes (or
> #else's them in) does glibc (or really, any non-kernel user) need?
> Would someone have the time to try casing all of these inside of #ifdef
> __KERNEL__ ? I've finished doing similar for SH re
On Sun, Sep 26, 2004 at 04:36:17AM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote:
> Then the bug is the program which uses asm/setup.h. It's not for
> userland headers.
Then I would ask why you supply it?
Should one consider a bootloader userland?
However, I don't really care, I was just pointing out a bug in
y
At Sun, 26 Sep 2004 14:02:59 -0700,
Tom Rini wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 26, 2004 at 08:42:38PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > On Sat, 25 Sep 2004, GOTO Masanori wrote:
> > > At Sat, 25 Sep 2004 11:58:56 +1000,
> > > Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > > > On Sat, 2004-09-25 at 11:44, GOTO Masanori wr
On Sun, Sep 26, 2004 at 08:42:38PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Sat, 25 Sep 2004, GOTO Masanori wrote:
> > At Sat, 25 Sep 2004 11:58:56 +1000,
> > Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > > On Sat, 2004-09-25 at 11:44, GOTO Masanori wrote:
> > > > At Wed, 15 Sep 2004 14:51:00 -0500,
> > > > Steph
On Sun, Sep 26, 2004 at 08:42:38PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Sat, 25 Sep 2004, GOTO Masanori wrote:
> > At Sat, 25 Sep 2004 11:58:56 +1000,
> > Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > > On Sat, 2004-09-25 at 11:44, GOTO Masanori wrote:
> > > > At Wed, 15 Sep 2004 14:51:00 -0500,
> > > > Steph
On Sat, 25 Sep 2004, GOTO Masanori wrote:
> At Sat, 25 Sep 2004 11:58:56 +1000,
> Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > On Sat, 2004-09-25 at 11:44, GOTO Masanori wrote:
> > > At Wed, 15 Sep 2004 14:51:00 -0500,
> > > Stephen R. Marenka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > asm/setup.h contains #include ,
At Sat, 25 Sep 2004 13:21:02 -0500,
Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> > At Wed, 15 Sep 2004 14:51:00 -0500,
> > Stephen R. Marenka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > asm/setup.h contains #include ,
> > > which is non-existent on ppc.
>
> Well the problem is that the following fails miserably because of a
On Sat, Sep 25, 2004 at 10:44:29AM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote:
> At Wed, 15 Sep 2004 14:51:00 -0500,
> Stephen R. Marenka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > asm/setup.h contains #include ,
> > which is non-existent on ppc.
Well the problem is that the following fails miserably because of a
missing h
Hi Ben and Geert,
At Sat, 25 Sep 2004 11:58:56 +1000,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Sat, 2004-09-25 at 11:44, GOTO Masanori wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > At Wed, 15 Sep 2004 14:51:00 -0500,
> > Stephen R. Marenka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > asm/setup.h contains #include ,
> > > which is non-e
Hi,
At Wed, 15 Sep 2004 14:51:00 -0500,
Stephen R. Marenka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> asm/setup.h contains #include ,
> which is non-existent on ppc.
Then what's the problem? I guess you didn't get any problems; if so I
close this bug.
BTW, PPC guys, is it intentional to include asm-m68k/set
On Sat, 2004-09-25 at 11:44, GOTO Masanori wrote:
> Hi,
>
> At Wed, 15 Sep 2004 14:51:00 -0500,
> Stephen R. Marenka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > asm/setup.h contains #include ,
> > which is non-existent on ppc.
>
> Then what's the problem? I guess you didn't get any problems; if so I
> close
Package: linux-kernel-headers
Version: 2.5.999-test7-bk-17
Severity: minor
asm/setup.h contains #include ,
which is non-existent on ppc.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (990, 'testing')
Architecture: powerpc (ppc)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-loki.34
Locale
13 matches
Mail list logo
