At Sat, 16 Apr 2005 16:39:08 +0200,
Martin Dickopp wrote:
> martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > also sprach Martin Dickopp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.04.16.1552 +0200]:
> >> Therefore, any actual behavior (including the existing one as well
> >> as the suggested alternatives) would be
At Mon, 27 Sep 2004 12:22:31 +0200,
martin f krafft wrote:
> And second: yeah, so? I am sure there exists some function to query
> the timezone database for existance and handle this properly within
> date. As it stands, strftime and date are buggy.
> Well, the problem seems to be better fixed in
also sprach GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.09.27.1117 +0200]:
> Hmm... Did you read my previous posts?
I wonder if you ever read any of ours, and let your brain do some
thinking upon doing so.
> > (a) report an error and do not display the date
> > or
> > (b) report the GMT time *
3 matches
Mail list logo
