I don't agree with the concept of "UTF-8-CJK" because it's over
exaggerated. Is it a locale dependent issue, or character encoding
issue?
According to UAX#11, your point doesn't make sense because your
reference just mention about character mapping. Instead, "When
processing or displaying data"
As Roland declared glibc 2.4 release plan in the list, I create glibc
2.4 branch for developing debian-glibc package based on glibc-2.4.
You can pull 2.4 branch from:
svn co svn+ssh://svn.debian.org/svn/pkg-glibc/glibc-package/branches/glibc-2.4
It's based on the latest svn trunk revision 1255
At Thu, 23 Feb 2006 10:46:25 +0100,
Andrea Gasparini wrote:
> i'm at first post in this list, and i'm searching for a solution to one
> problem, so excuse me if it's not pefectly in topic here...
>
> So, this is the problem:
> i want to wrap almost all system call with LD_PRELOAD, and i would lik
At 16 Feb 2006 13:00:08 -0500,
Greg Stark wrote:
> > The man pages come from manpages-dev.
>
> It seems like the necessary #defines should be included in each man page along
> with the necessary #includes. I suspect I'll be tilting at windmills trying to
> convince people of this though.
Can we r
At Thu, 23 Feb 2006 22:43:26 +0100,
Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> I have just uploaded glibc 2.3.6-2. It is now time to think to the next
> upload, glibc 2.3.6-3.
Gook work!
> Personally here is the things I would like to see in it:
>
> - Split of libc6 and libc6-dev into libraries and binaries. This
At Fri, 27 Jan 2006 11:50:11 +0100,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> you are noted as the last translator of the debconf translation for
> glibc. The English template has been changed, and now some messages
> are marked "fuzzy" in your translation or are missing.
> I would be grateful if you could take t
At Tue, 7 Feb 2006 14:30:01 +1100,
Anand Kumria wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 11:42:31PM +0100, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I just realised that the timezone data in glibc is taken from an
> > upstream database (namely ftp://elsie.nci.nih.gov/pub/). This data
> > sometimes changes
At Mon, 19 Dec 2005 21:29:43 -0500,
Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 20, 2005 at 10:38:47AM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote:
> > At Sun, 20 Nov 2005 14:22:22 -0500,
> > Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > > Steve Langasek agreed. I am planning to bump the requirement up from
>
At Tue, 20 Dec 2005 08:26:29 +0100,
Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
> Wow, this is a bug come back from the dead. I read the summary in glibc
> and think it's wierd. For example, the counts supposedly showing
> "Eastern Standard Time" to be more popular than "Australia Eastern
> Standard Time" are bo
Thanks, I see the difference between pt_BR and pt. I put it in.
-- gotom
At Tue, 20 Dec 2005 23:18:35 +,
Miguel Figueiredo wrote:
> pt.po it's for European Portuguese (Portuguese) and pt_BR.po it's for
> Brazilien Portuguese.
> One doesn't replace the other.
At Wed, 21 Dec 2005 21:45:37 +00
At Sun, 20 Nov 2005 14:22:22 -0500,
Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> Steve Langasek agreed. I am planning to bump the requirement up from
> 2.2.whatever to 2.4.0 for i486 and powerpc; i486 in order to enable
> floating stacks, and powerpc because we've been getting bug reports
> that indicate that stati
At Mon, 14 Nov 2005 23:26:04 +,
Rui Branco wrote:
> Portuguese translation for glibc's debconf messages by Simão Pedro
> Cardoso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Feel free to use it.
>
> For translation updates please contact last translator and/or CC the
> Portuguese translation team
Thanks for your w
At Mon, 21 Nov 2005 10:42:14 +0100,
Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> The script /etc/init.d/glibc.sh can not be sourced, as it contain
> 'exit 0' at the end of the script. This is against policy, specifying
> that all .sh scripts in /etc/rcS.d/ will be sourced. I discovered
> this while fixing sysv-r
At Fri, 9 Dec 2005 16:43:48 +1100,
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The official list of timezones for Australia, as provided by the Australian
> Government, does not include EST anywhere on the page. AEST is the correct
> abbreviation.
>
> http://www.australia.gov.au/about-australia-13time";>
>
>
At Thu, 15 Dec 2005 17:13:25 -0800,
Edward Buck wrote:
> I guess the problem then is in the ipv6 support and how it implements
> domains in the search path. Instead of doing ipv6, then ipv4 for
> mx1.hotmail.com, it runs through all possible ipv6 queries, including
> exhausting all domains in the
At Mon, 19 Sep 2005 19:27:15 +0200,
Matthias Klose wrote:
> > On the latest i386 Sid, gcc-4.0 does not build from source, on my machine,
> > and on a buildd (see the logs). With dash as sh, I get:
>
> this is known, we're waiting on proper 64bit support from glibc. I'd
> like to downgrade this one
At Sun, 11 Sep 2005 01:05:42 -0400,
Rob Warren wrote:
> I've just installed sarge onto the second netwinder without any
> problems with libc 2.3.2.ds1-22 with the netboot image, kernel 2.4.27.
>
> ...then I tried to boot from the kernel I was previously using (2.2.19)
> and got the dreaded resul
At Thu, 8 Sep 2005 06:26:19 -0700 (PDT),
Kokushoku Karasu wrote:
> This has to be the weirdest bug I've seen.
>
> Earlier I had a strange exit of FVWM, at the time I had been messing with
> the window for k3b, then I see the kdm greeting screen. Conclusion,
> something crashed.
>
> After two mor
At Sun, 4 Sep 2005 11:41:17 +0200,
Matthias Klose wrote:
> glibc-2.3.5 doesn't have the fpsetdefaults function anymore, which was
> available in 2.3.2. Is the omission intended? If yes, is there a
> replacement function? Currently the python fpectl module fpectl FTBFS.
I guess python misdetected O
At Thu, 1 Sep 2005 15:00:23 +0200,
Gabor Gombas wrote:
> > Why is this "unconditionally" happenned? What setting does this cause
> > this problem?
>
> Because bash calls getpwuid() to initialize the value of $SHELL before
> executing the script.
I understand the whole story - this problem could
At Wed, 31 Aug 2005 00:17:09 +0200,
Denis Barbier wrote:
> > Attached is a new version of the localedef.1 manual page
> > (debian/local/manpages/localedef.1) and a diff against the previous
> > version (the former is there so that people who want to review it can
> > more easily get a complete vers
At Wed, 31 Aug 2005 17:48:20 +0200,
Gabor Gombas wrote:
> Well, if /bin/sh is bash, then it is not weird at all, it is the same
> "bash vs. NSS" problem that came up several times in the past (last time
> quite recently on debian-devel). Previously it only happened with NSS
> modules that link to l
At Wed, 31 Aug 2005 01:12:25 -0400,
Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> /etc/init.d/glibc.sh uses dpkg --compare-versions extensively.
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~% which dpkg
> /usr/bin/dpkg
>
> Init scripts, at least this early, can't use /usr. It isn't mounted yet!
Good point, I missed this issue. I don'
At Sun, 28 Aug 2005 09:01:32 +0900,
GOTO Masanori wrote:
> Thanks for your notification. OK, finally i486 emulation is dead.
> Actually bswap and cmpxchg are not included in bash and init, but
> glibc ix86 libraries have them a lot. How about to change this
> warning part in -6 as
At Fri, 26 Aug 2005 11:52:30 +0200,
Zlatko Calusic wrote:
> No file-rc, and no long running (bash or other) processes. Here's
> process list just before /etc/init.d/umountfs runs the umount command,
> with only kernel daemons removed (they're not interesting, and too
> many of them):
>
> UID
At Mon, 29 Aug 2005 20:28:01 -0400,
Thomas Evans wrote:
> When you state "Upstream already moved to NPTL", do you mean the mainline
> libc
> development, or do youe mean that Debian/alpha libc is moving to NPTL?
The mainline libc, not debian alpha glibc. But I guess adding debian
alpha NPTL is
At Mon, 29 Aug 2005 13:18:01 -0400,
Thomas Evans wrote:
> Threads that have properly called pthread_detach() and pthread_exit()
> are not being cleaned up and remain in the process list as
> until the parent exits.
>
> This does not occur on systems running "testing" and has appeared only
> re
At Sat, 27 Aug 2005 16:16:14 -0400,
Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> #317082 is "moreinfo". Has a decision been made on how to fix this?
> If not, frankly it should be downgraded to "important", because it only
> hurts biarch -- meaning it isn't actually a blocker for any single
> subarchitecture -- and
severity 325226 important
thanks
At Sat, 27 Aug 2005 00:07:17 +0200,
Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> It seems that on amd64, all binaries and libraries in the libc6
> pacakge have a wrong dynamic linker in the binaries.
>
> ldd /lib/libc.so.6
> /lib/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x002a95556000)
> ldd /u
At Sat, 27 Aug 2005 18:59:09 -0400,
Andres Salomon wrote:
> > +# intel i386 requires a recent kernel
> > +if [ "$realarch" = i386 ]
> > +then
> > + if dpkg --compare-versions "$kernel_ver" lt 2.4.24
> > + then
> > + echo WARNING: This machine has i386 class processor.
> > +
At Sat, 27 Aug 2005 19:20:46 -0400,
Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 26, 2005 at 01:56:34PM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote:
> > > > Check is used for example glibc mets invalid kernel version like
> > > > 2.6.1220050825 or glibc detects pre 2.4.24 running kernel on rea
At Fri, 26 Aug 2005 12:13:36 +0900,
GOTO Masanori wrote:
> > * debian/control.in/powerpc: New libc6-(dev-)powerpc packages for ppc64.
>
> This name "powerpc" is confusable with the current powerpc - could I
> rename it from powerpc to ppc32?
Note that ppc32
At Thu, 25 Aug 2005 23:42:03 -0400,
Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> I don't get it. What's the point? Almost 100% of the time, if we need
> to complain about a kernel version, things are going to break so badly
> that the #!/bin/sh at the top of the script isn't going to work.
If /bin/sh does not wor
At Wed, 24 Aug 2005 15:44:05 +0200,
Andreas Jochens wrote:
> * debian/control.in/powerpc: New libc6-(dev-)powerpc packages for ppc64.
This name "powerpc" is confusable with the current powerpc - could I
rename it from powerpc to ppc32?
Regards,
-- gotom
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL P
At Fri, 26 Aug 2005 02:43:39 +,
Masanori Goto wrote:
> * Introduce bootstrap kernel version check script.
> - debian/debhelper.in/libc.preinst: Move detection script to...
> - debian/script.in/kernelcheck.sh: ...this, new file.
> - debian/local/etc_init.d/glibc.sh: New fil
At Thu, 25 Aug 2005 17:57:00 -0400,
Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 05:53:05PM +0200, Zlatko Calusic wrote:
> > GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > At Thu, 25 Aug 2005 12:56:04 +0200,
> > > Zlatko Calusic wrote:
> >
At Thu, 25 Aug 2005 22:40:02 +0200,
Denis Barbier wrote:
>
> On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 01:48:14AM +0200, Denis Barbier wrote:
> > * By default, locales are written into the old format (not into an
> > archive file). My motivation was that if someone needs to add a
> > local locale, she ca
At Thu, 25 Aug 2005 12:56:04 +0200,
Zlatko Calusic wrote:
> rc1119 root mem REG8,9 217016 228931 /var/db/nscd/passwd
This is another file which is not /var/run/nscd/dbXX.
> This is the process list at the same time (kernel daemons and ps
> itself excluded):
>
> UID
reassign 323849 libterm-readline-gnu-perl
severity 323849 important
merge 304604 323849 322746
thanks
At Thu, 18 Aug 2005 13:30:59 -0700,
Ross Boylan wrote:
> My system is mostly testing, but I upgraded parts to unstable,
> including glibc. During that same upgrade, I got the error:
> ---
At Thu, 25 Aug 2005 09:59:46 +0200,
Zlatko Calusic wrote:
> GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > At Wed, 24 Aug 2005 20:14:43 +0200,
> > Zlatko Calusic wrote:
> >> With the latest changes in nscd functionality, namely using persistent
> >> data
At Wed, 24 Aug 2005 20:14:43 +0200,
Zlatko Calusic wrote:
> With the latest changes in nscd functionality, namely using persistent
> database in /var/db/nscd, /var partition can't be cleanly umounted. I
> tried to avoid the problem by disabling persistent database, but even
> that didn't help becau
At Tue, 23 Aug 2005 01:27:43 -0700,
Steve Langasek wrote:
> > - cmpult Y, X, RV
> > + cmpule Y, X, RV
> > excb
> > mt_fpcr $f3
> > ldt $f0, 0(sp)
>
> > but I don't have time for testing.
>
> Thanks, after looking at the diff between divq.S and divqu.S and
severity 324795 normal
tags 324795 moreinfo
thanks
At Wed, 24 Aug 2005 09:11:30 -0400,
Rob Warren wrote:
> I was upgrading from woody to sarge when apt-get choked on upgrading
> libc6 from 2.2.5-11.8 to 2.3.2.ds1-22 with a message along the lines of
> 'can't seek in file xx'. dmesg would rep
At Wed, 24 Aug 2005 11:30:30 -0400,
Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> Actually, to be completely correct, the right value should be
> "Conflicts: e2fsprogs (< 1.35-7)", as linux-gate.so started being
> filtered in e2fsprogs 1.35-7.
OK, I changed from (<= 1.37-2sarge1) to (<< 1.35-7). Thanks!
Regards,
--
At Wed, 24 Aug 2005 12:46:34 +0900,
Horms wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 23, 2005 at 08:17:58AM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 23, 2005 at 07:49:23PM +0900, Simon Horman [Horms] wrote:
> > > long time no see. It seems that the problem is indeed fixed if you get
> > > the sarge (or later) version
At Tue, 23 Aug 2005 22:38:15 -0400,
Rob Warren wrote:
> Version: 2.3.2.ds1-22
>
> Keeping up with Stable the new release for libc6 is broken. dpkg dies
> on the upgrade.
Did you try to upgrade from woody to sarge? Or from sarge to the
current sid? Please imagine 2.3.2.ds1-22 is broken - many a
At Tue, 23 Aug 2005 20:18:02 -0700,
Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> > severity 324795 critical
> Bug#324795: libc6 in stable broken on arm4vl
> Severity set to `critical'.
Why did you bump up severity of this report? Do you have this problem
too?
Regards,
-- gotom
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
s for their
> consideration.
I don't know what the actual problem is, but I fixed this kind of ldd
filtering problem for mkinitrd during the final stage of sarge
development. Does this help you?
* GOTO Masanori
- Make mkinitrd work with new ldd format which change is introduced
in g
At Mon, 22 Aug 2005 20:54:07 +0200,
Michael Banck wrote:
> attached is a dpatch which fixes gcc-4.0 build issues on hurd-i386. The
> parts by Roland McGrath have been taken from CVS, the part by Alfred M.
> Szmidt has not been applied yet and was thus taken from
> http://sources.redhat.com/ml/libc
At Mon, 22 Aug 2005 11:52:08 -0400,
Ravi Nanavati wrote:
> After upgrading libc6 (from 2.3.2.ds1-22) to 2.3.5-3 I am no longer able to
> compile and link Verilog simulations with Synopsys VCS. The problem appears
> to be missing symbols in libc6. The error messages I get are as follows:
> gcc -
At Sun, 21 Aug 2005 23:55:42 -0700,
Blars Blarson wrote:
> glbic failed to build on a sparc buildd. It is currently building on
> my sparc pbuilder, I'll report when the build finishes.
I changed it, -5 should fix this problem.
Regards,
-- gotom
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
w
At Sat, 20 Aug 2005 09:05:02 +0200,
Gerhard Tonn wrote:
> > Linux debian01 2.6.11-1-s390x #1 SMP Mon Apr 4 18:37:40 CEST 2005
> s390x GNU/Linux
>
> The buildd runs now on a different machine with a 2.4 kernel. I will
> build glibc on debian01 in the future.
I uploaded glibc 2.3.5-4 on s390 by
At Wed, 17 Aug 2005 03:06:12 +0200,
Zoran Dzelajlija wrote:
> Well, for one thing, upgrading libc6 triggers the breakage on
> unrelated, already installed packages - and there's a lot of those
> linked to eg. libssl-0.9.7.so. BTW. looks like there are some patches
> which mitigate this issue, see
I found NPTL/buildd kernel mismatch problem today when I saw the s390
build log failure at
http://buildd.debian.org/~jeroen/status/package.php?p=glibc
/build/buildd/glibc-2.3.5/build-tree/s390-nptl/elf/ld.so.1
--library-path ... /build/buildd/glibc-2.3.5/build-tree/s390-nptl/timezone/zic
At Thu, 18 Aug 2005 16:36:53 -0400 (EDT),
David S. Miller wrote:
> Yes, because the optimized memcpy/memset in the sparcv9 package
> is severely suboptimal for UltraSPARC-III and later chips, which
> is what the sparcv9b package is needed for.
...
> Right, it will be necessary. To be honest, pure
At Thu, 18 Aug 2005 15:56:19 +0200,
Andreas Barth wrote:
> during building openmotif on sparc, this error happened:
>
> gcc -g -O2 -Wall -Wno-unused -Wno-comment -o .libs/periodic periodic.o
> ../../../lib/Xm/.libs/libXm.so -L/usr/X11R6/lib
> ../../../lib/Mrm/.libs/libMrm.so
> /build/buildd/op
> if (errno != ENOMEM && errno != EFAULT)
Thanks, this is one of the best bug that I have produced, I go to
sleep now...
Regards,
-- gotom
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
At Thu, 18 Aug 2005 12:58:58 +0200,
Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> I think m68k has no nptl either, and as m68k are a very vocal minority
> you'll have more flames about that ;-)
>
> Let's try to get NPTL working on 2.3 with all supported architectures
> first, that's been long overdue - long term dro
At Mon, 15 Aug 2005 10:12:31 -0400,
Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > I don't know what the exact problem is - Does this problem occur with
> > 2.4 kernel? Can all furious PaX reports be fixed using 2.6 kernel?
>
> This is separate from the PaX problems - it's stock 2.4. I don't know
> why it happens
At Thu, 18 Aug 2005 02:39:23 -0400 (EDT),
David S. Miller wrote:
> > I have a question about optimization package: libc6-sparcv9 and
> > libc6-sparcv9b. Both packages are prepared for optimized versions of
> > libc6. They are currently supported - but I would like to know what
> > the advantage o
At Thu, 18 Aug 2005 10:24:14 +0200,
Andreas Jochens wrote:
> There is already an inofficial buildd for the ppc64 architecture
> running for 'unstable'. The respective ppc64 package archive is located at
>
> deb http://debian-ppc64.alioth.debian.org/gcc4 unstable main
>
> and almost 95% of all sou
At Wed, 17 Aug 2005 12:41:39 +0100,
Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > At Mon, 23 May 2005 23:28:01 +0300,
> > Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> >> The English output of "localedef --help" contains this:
> >>
> >> --posixBe strictly POSIX conform
> >>
> >> The last word should surely be "confor
At Wed, 17 Aug 2005 22:05:42 +0200,
Andreas Jochens wrote:
> I guess you will generally have many more issues than this one when you
> try to build 64-bit packages on a 32-bit buildd (e.g. compiling and
> running 64-bit programs from configure scripts, running 'make check' or
> 'make test' targe
At Wed, 17 Aug 2005 17:00:23 +0100,
Scott James Remnant wrote:
> I don't think this is just a dpkg-dev bug, these "bi-arch" systems need
> to provide ldd or an equivalent that can read either form of shared
> library that it would support.
>
> objdump isn't a solution either, while it sometimes ca
At Wed, 17 Aug 2005 08:04:35 +0200,
Marc Haber wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 17, 2005 at 11:47:43AM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote:
> > Please try: ls -al /usr/lib/locale/locale-archive .
> > If it's existed, then try to remove this file and invoke locale -a again.
> > I guess it&
Hi,
I have a question about optimization package: libc6-sparcv9 and
libc6-sparcv9b. Both packages are prepared for optimized versions of
libc6. They are currently supported - but I would like to know what
the advantage of those packages is. Just optimization? Are those
packages widely used?
T
Hi,
These bugs are marked as important when glibc 2.3.2.ds1 is used in
sarge. Nowadays we have new glibc 2.3.5-3 in unstable. Could you
test dbus-1 with new glibc? I guess this problem is already fixed.
Regards,
-- gotom
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsu
At Mon, 23 May 2005 23:28:01 +0300,
Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> The English output of "localedef --help" contains this:
>
> --posixBe strictly POSIX conform
>
> The last word should surely be "conforming".
You'll find "POSIX conform" has been used like a noun via google.
I thin
At Sun, 07 Aug 2005 09:43:06 +0200,
Marc Haber wrote:
> $ locale -a
> locale: Cannot set LC_CTYPE to default locale: No such file or directory
> C
> POSIX
> de_DE
> de_DE.iso88591
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> de_DE.utf8
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> deutsch
> german
> $ dpkg --list locales
> Desired=Unknown/Insta
At Tue, 16 Aug 2005 03:21:35 -0500,
Mark Nipper wrote:
> I should not this doesn't happen on my testing machines
> with libc6 2.3.2.ds1-22. I diff'ed the standard nscd.conf
> between the two versions and aside from additional comment junk,
> the apparent problems seem to be these:
> ---
> >
At Mon, 8 Aug 2005 10:09:38 -0400,
Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > 08:47 mprotect(0xb000, 4096,
> > PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE|PROT_EXEC|PROT_GROWSDOWN) = -1 EINVAL (Invalid
> > argument)
> > 08:47 mprotect(0xbfff8000, 32768, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE|PROT_EXEC) =
> > -1 EFAULT (Bad address)
> > 08:55
merge 322953 317082
severity 317082 serious
thanks
At Sat, 13 Aug 2005 20:28:23 +0200,
Andreas Jochens wrote:
> When building 'glibc' on in a clean chroot on powerpc/unstable,
> I get the following error:
>
> touch /glibc-2.3.5/stamp-dir/install_libc
> Installing ppc64
> rm -rf /glibc-2.3.5/debia
At Sun, 14 Aug 2005 15:05:38 -0400,
Joey Hess wrote:
> > I changed now. BTW, is it ok to leave dependency "Depends:
> > libnss-dns-udeb"?
>
> Good point, we do currently include libc on at least one image (boot
> floppy) without libnss-dns, so it's not really a dependency and the
> dependency sho
At Wed, 10 Aug 2005 23:51:18 -0400,
Joey Hess wrote:
> libc6-udeb depends on libnss-files-udeb, which is unnecessary since most
> d-i images don't need that udeb at all, and the udebs that do need it
> seems to depend on it (openssh-client-udeb, openssh-server-udeb).
I changed now. BTW, is it ok
At Wed, 10 Aug 2005 17:24:26 -0300 (BRT),
Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote:
> 3 days after restaring Apache and no more errors. Maybe close the bug?
We'll fix glibc to introduce restarting apache question again.
Regards,
-- gotom
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsu
At Thu, 11 Aug 2005 21:36:37 -0400,
Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 12:44:00PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 04:14:55AM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> > > "PPC libc6 should be built with TLS and NPTL"
> > > We have new enough GCC now, and new glibc
At Fri, 12 Aug 2005 14:42:56 -0400,
Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > yes. trying to build the packages from amd64-libs for biarch.
>
> Then you've got glibc messed up, not ncurses. You can't install the
> i386 headers and expect things to work; you might be able to just
> install the x86_64 headers,
kg-buildpackage -b
> dpkg-buildpackage: source package is glibc
> dpkg-buildpackage: source version is 2.3.5-3
> dpkg-buildpackage: source changed by GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> dpkg-buildpackage: host architecture powerpc
> dpkg-checkbuilddeps: Unmet build dependencies: g
At Fri, 12 Aug 2005 20:50:25 +0200,
Adrian Bunk wrote:
> After upgrading from the sarge libc6, sshd on my computer no longer
> accepted connections.
>
> Restarting sshd fixed the problem.
>
> It seems the "restart services" question in the postinst should be
> asked for upgrades from < 2.3.5 .
>
At Mon, 8 Aug 2005 09:47:48 -0400,
Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 08, 2005 at 10:46:40PM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote:
> > At Sun, 7 Aug 2005 10:43:43 -0400,
> > Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > > Are libc6-i686 and libc6 the same version? Have they been upgraded
> &
At Sun, 7 Aug 2005 10:43:43 -0400,
Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> Are libc6-i686 and libc6 the same version? Have they been upgraded
> since you last restarted apache?
Note that during glibc 2.3.5-2, I add this check code. If version
number between libc6-i686 and libc6 are not matched, the post/pre
tags 207391 fixed-upstream
thanks
I fixed this problem during glibc 2.3.90. It'll be fixed
automatically in the next glibc major update.
Regards,
-- gotom
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
At Mon, 23 May 2005 18:07:02 +0200,
Laurent Bonnaud wrote:
> I have a static binary that runs well on sarge and sid systems. On this
> system
> with libc6 from experimental, it fails:
>
> $ ./multivideo.static
>
> Gdk-WARNING **: locale not supported by C library
> multivideo.static: dynamic-li
Hi,
At Fri, 31 Oct 2003 15:11:47 +0100,
Raphael Manfredi wrote:
> I've noticed that the problem disappears (did not manifest itself
> in 6 hours) if I remove the unneeded "-lpthread" in the link
> line.
>
> The "-lpthread" comes via the "pkg-config --libs libxml-2.0" call
> but is otherwise unnee
These bugs are tagged as woody, because they're well-known problems
and for keeping open to come to light what the problem is. However,
as you know, sarge was released. Our stable version was moved from
woody to sarge. It's high time to close old woody's bugs that are
still open. Now I close th
At Tue, 2 Aug 2005 10:02:46 -0400,
Josh Metzler wrote:
> As far as I understand, #318979 caused xorg-x11 to FTBFS on sparc because it
> included which used __user but failed to include
> where __user was defined. This was apparently fixed in
> linux-kernel-headers_2.6.13+0rc3-1. So, #318979
At Wed, 3 Aug 2005 22:50:29 +0200,
Denis Barbier wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 03, 2005 at 08:15:05PM +, Masanori Goto wrote:
> > + ur_PK/UTF-8 \
> > + uz_UZ/ISO-8859-1 \
> > ++uz_UZ.UTF-8 UTF-8 \
>
> Oops, I was referring to the SUPPORTED file shipped by the locales
> package. When patching original
At Tue, 2 Aug 2005 22:09:50 +0200,
Denis Barbier wrote:
> > I've checked and all localedata is available in SUPPORTED with the
> > current 2.3.5-3 development in svn - it'll be OK when 2.3.5 is into
> > unstable.
>
> According to /usr/share/i18n/locales/[EMAIL PROTECTED] files, Uzbek
> language ca
At Mon, 1 Aug 2005 17:38:17 +0200,
Adeodato Simó wrote:
> > Before applying a patch, I would like to hear why this bug affects
> > only sparc?
>
> No, it's not sparc-specific. What I meant is that, from a release
> management point of view, it is preventing xorg-x11 from being a
> candidate
At Fri, 29 Jul 2005 19:51:34 +0300 (EEST),
Tuukka Toivonen wrote:
> > ulimit -a
> core file size(blocks, -c) 0
> data seg size (kbytes, -d) unlimited
> file size (blocks, -f) unlimited
> max locked memory (kbytes, -l) unlimited
> max memory size (kbytes, -m) un
At Mon, 1 Aug 2005 14:24:19 +0200,
Adeodato Simó wrote:
> > This bug also affects xorg-x11, which FTBFS with current l-k-h as some input
> > drivers #include
>
> Hello,
>
> Please consider prioritizing this bug, since we can't get a first
> build of xorg-x11 on SPARC until it gets fixed (pre
At Mon, 01 Aug 2005 15:04:36 +1200,
Dru wrote:
> >According to http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121 ,
> >it was marked as invalid. I think it's OK to close this report.
> >If you have another information, please let us know.
>
> Yip its ok appears to have been working fine this
Guilherme, Leslie,
I'm Debian Project GNU C Library package developer. Leslie, I got the
following report from Guilherme that reported glibc.po in pt_BR
translation has a typo:
http://bugs.debian.org/319422/
At Sun, 31 Jul 2005 12:36:43 -0300,
Guilherme de S. Pastore wrote:
> As you not
At Fri, 15 Jul 2005 11:18:26 -0500,
Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> This does not seem to be something that changes in make are
> going to fix. make essentially makes a glob (3) call; and that
> library call is where the segmentation violation occurs. Considering
> that the number of entries i
tags 296532 unreproducible moreinfo
thanks
> I'm not sure what caused this. Every time ldconfig is run, it spews:
>
> /sbin/ldconfig: /usr/lib/ is not a symbolic link
>
> So this gets kind of annoying every time a library package is installed.
>
> It hasn't happened until recently. A strace log
tags 299137 fixed-upstream
thanks
It should be fixed in 2.3.5.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tags 298488 fixed-upstream
thanks
It should be fixed in 2.3.5.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tags 175163 fixed-upstream
thanks
It should be fixed in 2.3.5.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tags 165921 woody
tags 205039 woody
thanks
Both two bugs are marked as woody because it's used for woody -> sarge
transition.
Regards,
-- gotom
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tags 297010 fixed-upstream
thanks
It should be fixed in 2.3.5.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
1 - 100 of 2212 matches
Mail list logo
