reassign 257658 locales
merge 257658 246270
thanks
At 04 Jul 2004 18:36:34 -0700,
Scott Sawyer wrote:
> I do not think this is a GCC error but something wrong with the local
> files included with the locales package. Simple testing should confirm
> it however. It fails when it's compiling the by
At Tue, 29 Jun 2004 02:53:10 +0900,
GOTO Masanori wrote:
> At Fri, 18 Jun 2004 13:17:54 +0100,
> Robin Stevens wrote:
> > I am using Debian woody on a sparc64 system, running a 2.4.26 kernel.
> > Having a need to upgrade to a later version of jigdo-file (0.7.0-2 from
> > testing), various other pac
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 254314 confirmed fixed-upstream
Bug#254314: regexec(): segfaults in UTF-8 locales under some circumstances
There were no tags set.
Tags added: confirmed, fixed-upstream
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 257658 locales
Bug#257658: locales in testing: fails during compile of locales
Warning: Unknown package 'in'
Warning: Unknown package 'testing'
Bug reassigned from package `locales in testing' to `locales'.
> merge 257658 246270
Bug#246270: lo
At Mon, 19 May 2003 18:35:43 +0900,
GOTO Masanori wrote:
> > The awk script has:
> > RS="\n\n";FS="\n"
> > meaning that the record separator is ONE empty line, and every line
> > after that is a separate field. Then $2 is checked for:
> > /Status: .* installed$/
> > Unfortunately, with 2 em
Hi,
As 246547 was submitted, the current debian glibc does not support amd
pure 64 architecture. AFAIK you have glibc_2.3.2.ds1-13.0.0.1 for
amd64.
I plan to upgrade 2.3.2.ds1-14 for the last sarge hopefully. I would
like to add amd64 support to this version. Could you resend your
latest amd64
Repository: glibc-package/debian/debhelper.in
who:gotom
time: Sun Jul 4 22:02:28 MDT 2004
Log Message:
- debian/debhelper.in/libc.postinst: Fix package detection failure when
uninstalled package is encountered during NSS upgrade.
(Closes: #193278)
- debian
Repository: glibc-package/debian
who:gotom
time: Sun Jul 4 22:02:28 MDT 2004
Log Message:
- debian/debhelper.in/libc.postinst: Fix package detection failure when
uninstalled package is encountered during NSS upgrade.
(Closes: #193278)
- debian/debhelper.in
I do not think this is a GCC error but something wrong with the local
files included with the locales package. Simple testing should confirm
it however. It fails when it's compiling the byn_EN locales package
within the pre-compiled testing deb package.
-Scott
--
Scott Sawyer, RHCE
reassign 257658 locales
merge 257658 246270
thanks
At 04 Jul 2004 18:36:34 -0700,
Scott Sawyer wrote:
> I do not think this is a GCC error but something wrong with the local
> files included with the locales package. Simple testing should confirm
> it however. It fails when it's compiling the by
At Tue, 29 Jun 2004 02:53:10 +0900,
GOTO Masanori wrote:
> At Fri, 18 Jun 2004 13:17:54 +0100,
> Robin Stevens wrote:
> > I am using Debian woody on a sparc64 system, running a 2.4.26 kernel.
> > Having a need to upgrade to a later version of jigdo-file (0.7.0-2 from
> > testing), various other pac
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 254314 confirmed fixed-upstream
Bug#254314: regexec(): segfaults in UTF-8 locales under some circumstances
There were no tags set.
Tags added: confirmed, fixed-upstream
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 257658 locales
Bug#257658: locales in testing: fails during compile of locales
Warning: Unknown package 'in'
Warning: Unknown package 'testing'
Bug reassigned from package `locales in testing' to `locales'.
> merge 257658 246270
Bug#246270: lo
You need to try siltenafil citrate...2.40 each.
All pills are produced in world-class licensed facilities only.
Place your order today. It will be one of the best decisions of the year.
Marcie Mcquire
http://rd.yahoo.com/Gsb/*http://Budiptxf.affordableonlinegenerics.com
Not interested in
At Mon, 19 May 2003 18:35:43 +0900,
GOTO Masanori wrote:
> > The awk script has:
> > RS="\n\n";FS="\n"
> > meaning that the record separator is ONE empty line, and every line
> > after that is a separate field. Then $2 is checked for:
> > /Status: .* installed$/
> > Unfortunately, with 2 em
Hi,
As 246547 was submitted, the current debian glibc does not support amd
pure 64 architecture. AFAIK you have glibc_2.3.2.ds1-13.0.0.1 for
amd64.
I plan to upgrade 2.3.2.ds1-14 for the last sarge hopefully. I would
like to add amd64 support to this version. Could you resend your
latest amd64
Repository: glibc-package/debian/debhelper.in
who:gotom
time: Sun Jul 4 22:02:28 MDT 2004
Log Message:
- debian/debhelper.in/libc.postinst: Fix package detection failure when
uninstalled package is encountered during NSS upgrade.
(Closes: #193278)
- debian
Repository: glibc-package/debian
who:gotom
time: Sun Jul 4 22:02:28 MDT 2004
Log Message:
- debian/debhelper.in/libc.postinst: Fix package detection failure when
uninstalled package is encountered during NSS upgrade.
(Closes: #193278)
- debian/debhelper.in
At Sun, 04 Jul 2004 09:35:05 +1000,
Robert Collins wrote:
> On Sun, 2004-07-04 at 05:05, GOTO Masanori wrote:
> > At Fri, 02 Jul 2004 16:32:48 +1000,
> > Robert Collins wrote:
> > > Package: libc6
> > > Version: 2.3.2.ds1-13
> > > Severity: minor
> > > File: /usr/bin/zdump
> > >
> > > This can lea
Package: locales in testing
Severity: important
Tags: experimental l10n
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.6-1-686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C
Your message dated Mon, 05 Jul 2004 09:52:04 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#200076: libc6: setsockopt does not support IPOPT_RA (FWD)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
I do not think this is a GCC error but something wrong with the local
files included with the locales package. Simple testing should confirm
it however. It fails when it's compiling the byn_EN locales package
within the pre-compiled testing deb package.
-Scott
--
Scott Sawyer, RHCE
You need to try siltenafil citrate...2.40 each.
All pills are produced in world-class licensed facilities only.
Place your order today. It will be one of the best decisions of the year.
Marcie Mcquire
http://rd.yahoo.com/Gsb/*http://Budiptxf.affordableonlinegenerics.com
Not interested in
Your message dated Mon, 05 Jul 2004 09:10:07 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#221510: emacs21: pthread error in shell mode on ia64
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not t
At Sun, 04 Jul 2004 09:35:05 +1000,
Robert Collins wrote:
> On Sun, 2004-07-04 at 05:05, GOTO Masanori wrote:
> > At Fri, 02 Jul 2004 16:32:48 +1000,
> > Robert Collins wrote:
> > > Package: libc6
> > > Version: 2.3.2.ds1-13
> > > Severity: minor
> > > File: /usr/bin/zdump
> > >
> > > This can lea
Package: locales in testing
Severity: important
Tags: experimental l10n
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.6-1-686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAI
Your message dated Mon, 05 Jul 2004 09:52:04 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#200076: libc6: setsockopt does not support IPOPT_RA (FWD)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
Your message dated Mon, 05 Jul 2004 09:10:07 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#221510: emacs21: pthread error in shell mode on ia64
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not t
> I think there're some different opinions for this bug.
Just to repeat it again and again: this is considered to be a very ugly bug by
the German translation team. There is _absolute_ consensus that the patch
should be applied. So far no native German speaker has spoken up against it.
Could yo
> I think there're some different opinions for this bug.
Just to repeat it again and again: this is considered to be a very ugly bug by
the German translation team. There is _absolute_ consensus that the patch
should be applied. So far no native German speaker has spoken up against it.
Could yo
30 matches
Mail list logo
