Re: GEOS 3.6

2017-12-01 Thread Thomas Voß
simplifying geometries > >>> with GDAL, which seems to be caused by > >>> https://trac.osgeo.org/geos/ticket/741 in GEOS. The respective fix > >>> made it to GEOS 3.6. > >>> > >>> We are investigating into options for pulling GEOS with

Re: GEOS 3.6

2017-11-28 Thread Thomas Voß
>>> https://trac.osgeo.org/geos/ticket/741 in GEOS. The respective fix >>> made it to GEOS 3.6. >>> >>> We are investigating into options for pulling GEOS with the fix >>> included into our builds. Do you have plans to update GEOS to 3.6 (we >>> a

Re: GEOS 3.6

2017-11-28 Thread Thomas Voß
espective fix >> made it to GEOS 3.6. >> >> We are investigating into options for pulling GEOS with the fix >> included into our builds. Do you have plans to update GEOS to 3.6 (we >> are happy to use unstable or backports)? If not, do you think it's >> feasibl

Re: GEOS 3.6

2017-11-28 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
On 11/28/2017 09:18 AM, Bas Couwenberg wrote: > On 2017-11-28 09:00, Thomas Voß wrote: >> we are right now investigating an issue when simplifying geometries >> with GDAL, which seems to be caused by >> https://trac.osgeo.org/geos/ticket/741 in GEOS. The respective fix &

Re: GEOS 3.6

2017-11-28 Thread Bas Couwenberg
On 2017-11-28 09:00, Thomas Voß wrote: we are right now investigating an issue when simplifying geometries with GDAL, which seems to be caused by https://trac.osgeo.org/geos/ticket/741 in GEOS. The respective fix made it to GEOS 3.6. We are investigating into options for pulling GEOS with the

GEOS 3.6

2017-11-28 Thread Thomas Voß
Hey all, we are right now investigating an issue when simplifying geometries with GDAL, which seems to be caused by https://trac.osgeo.org/geos/ticket/741 in GEOS. The respective fix made it to GEOS 3.6. We are investigating into options for pulling GEOS with the fix included into our builds. Do