--- Comment #2 from jason at redhat dot com 2006-07-19 20:02 ---
Subject: Re: New: Anon namespace pointers in exported classes
Yes, this is an ODR violation. However, the patch I'm working on will
allow it to compile (as a side effect of other desired changes).
Jason
--
--- Comment #19 from jason at redhat dot com 2006-11-15 02:07 ---
Subject: Re: [4.1 regression] ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2084
OK, now I've really reverted the patch. Silly svn resolved...
Jason
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29825
--- Yo
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12765
jason at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12726
jason at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From jason at redhat dot com 2004-02-16 18:22
---
Subject: Re: [3.3/3.4/3.5] exception in constructor of a
class to be thrown is not caught
EDG performs this same optimization, but they seem to have made a different
choice as to whether or not the call which
--- Additional Comments From jason at redhat dot com 2004-02-16 18:27
---
Subject: Re: [3.3/3.4/3.5] exception in constructor of a
class to be thrown is not caught
Actually, this testcase does terminate under EDG:
struct A
{
A() { }
A(const A&) { throw 1; }
};
--- Additional Comments From jason at redhat dot com 2004-03-02 17:17
---
Subject: Re: [3.3/3.4 Regression] exception in constructor
of a class to be thrown is not caught
On 2 Mar 2004 11:10:38 -, "steven at gcc dot gnu dot org" <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
--- Additional Comments From jason at redhat dot com 2004-03-02 20:54
---
Subject: Re: [3.3 Regression] exception in constructor of a
class to be thrown is not caught
On 2 Mar 2004 20:44:22 -, "gdr at integrable-solutions dot net" <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> wrote:
8 matches
Mail list logo
