Source: gcc-7
Severity: important
Hello,
Present in gcc-snapshot, avx5124fmapsintrin.h is missing in the gcc-7 package.
it is included from:
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/7/include/immintrin.h
avx5124vnniwintrin.h is also missing
Thanks,
Sylvestre
-- System Information:
Debian Release: stretch
Package: gcc-7
Version: 7-20161125-1
Severity: important
3:22.53 /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/7/include/immintrin.h:75:10: fatal error:
avx512vpopcntdqintrin.h: No such file or directory
3:22.54 #include
3:22.54 ^
3:22.54 compilation terminated.
3:22.55
same with sgxintrin.h
Source: autofdo
Severity: normal
Hello,
llvm-toolchain-7 is now the default version in Debian.
As part of the effort to keep the number of llvm-toolchain versions under
control, it would be great if you could update to llvm-toolchain-7.
Thanks,
Sylvestre
Hello,
Le 26/10/2018 à 15:02, Matthias Klose a écrit :
Hi,
stage3 is approaching for GCC 9 development, and I put together a first gcc-9
package. I won't upload that to experimental yet because sonames and package
names will still change, and gcc-for-host will add a few hundred binary packages
Le 17/12/2018 à 14:22, Matthias Klose a écrit :
On 16.12.18 13:23, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
Hello,
[...]
I put the .orig.tar.gz at
https://people.debian.org/~doko/tmp/gcc-9/
Thanks. I am trying to build firefox with it.
Already found an issue (don't know if this is fx or gcc yet)
Source: gcc-7
Severity: important
Hello,
Upstream regressed on the option -gsplit-dwarf causing breakage on all
platforms.
Removing this option causes llvm-toolchain-* to break on 32 bit archs (OOM)
Please cherry-pick upstream revision r251399 into gcc packages so that this
option can be used a
Source: gcc-8
Severity: important
Hello,
cetintrin.h is missing from the package:
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/8/include/immintrin.h:93:10: fatal error:
cetintrin.h: No such file or directory
#include
^
compilation terminated.
--
# cat foo2.c
#include
# g+
Source: gcc-8
Severity: important
Hello
Just like list time:
41:18.80 /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/8/include/immintrin.h:77:10: fatal
error: avx512vbmi2intrin.h: No such file or directory
41:18.80 #include
41:18.80 ^
41:18.80 compilation terminated.
Cheers,
S
avx512vbmi2vlintrin.h
Package: g++-8
Version: 8-20171223-1
Severity: important
Hello,
One more time a missing file.
Maybe it is time to automate that?
2:18.25 In file included from
/root/firefox-gcc-last/gfx/skia/skia/src/core/../opts/SkNx_sse.h:11,
2:18.25 from
/root/firefox-gcc-last/gfx/skia/sk
Package: gcc-10
Version: 10.2.0-16
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
As part of the effort to limit the number of llvm packages in the
archive, please upgrade to -11.
Thanks,
Sylvestre
-- System Information:
Debian Release: bullseye/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (900, 'testing'), (60
Package: autofdo
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
As part of the effort to limit the number of llvm packages in the
archive, please upgrade to -11.
Thanks,
Sylvestre
Source: creduce
Version: 2.9~20181016-1
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
As part of the effort to limit the number of llvm packages in the
archive, please upgrade to -13 (or -12).
Thanks,
Sylvestre
-- System Information:
Debian Release: bookworm/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (60
Source: cvise
Version: 2.1.0-1
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
As part of the effort to limit the number of llvm packages in the
archive, please upgrade to -13 (or -12).
It has:
llvm-9-dev [armel armhf], libclang-9-dev [armel armhf], clang-9 [armel
armhf], clang-format-9 [armel armhf],
Source: creduce
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
As part of the effort to limit the number of llvm packages in the
archive, it would be great if you could upgrade to -13 (or -12).
Bookworm won't ship with llvm-toolchain-11
llvm-defaults is now pointing to -13.
Thanks,
Sylvestre
Source: autofdo
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
As part of the effort to limit the number of llvm packages in the
archive, it would be great if you could upgrade to -13 (or -12).
Bookworm won't ship with llvm-toolchain-11
llvm-defaults is now pointing to -13.
Thanks,
Sylvestre
Control: severity -1 serious
This package is one of the the last standing in the way of removing
llvm-toolchain-11. Bumping severity.
Sylvestre
Source: amdgcn-tools
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
As part of the effort to limit the number of llvm packages in the
archive, it would be great if you could upgrade to -14.
We are trying NOT to ship Bookworm with llvm-toolchain-13.
llvm-defaults is now pointing to -14.
Thanks,
Sylvestr
Source: autofdo
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
As part of the effort to limit the number of llvm packages in the
archive, it would be great if you could upgrade to -14.
We are trying NOT to ship Bookworm with llvm-toolchain-13.
llvm-defaults is now pointing to -14.
Thanks,
Sylvestre
Hello,
I have been able to reproduce this bug.
It occurs with gfortran under ia64 for the package:
https://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?&pkg=lapack&ver=3.2.2-1&arch=ia64&stamp=1279904320&file=log
As attachement, the result of the option -save-temps and the original
source itself.
The command lin
Package: libgfortran3
Version: 4.6.0-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hello,
I have a package (hdf5) which is built with gfortran.
It is going to use gfortran 4.5 as compiler but will use libgfortran3
as version 4.6. It is causing the FTBFS reported as #619281
and detail
Le mardi 19 avril 2011 à 11:45 +0200, Matthias Klose a écrit :
> tag 622783 + wontfix
> thanks
>
> On 04/14/2011 06:20 PM, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
> > Package: libgfortran3
> > Version: 4.6.0-2
> > Severity: grave
> > Justification: renders package unusable
>
Package: libstdc++6-4.5-dev
Version: 4.5.3-3
Severity: important
Hello,
It could be nice if you could remove the dependency of libstdc++6-4.5-dev on
g++-4.5.
I would like to be able to use an other compiler (clang) without having g++.
For information, this dependency is not present in testing an
Hello
I am closing this bug since hppa is no longer a target arch for Debian.
Sylvestre
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1312555303.19227.27.ca...@k
elog
===
--- debian/changelog (révision 5572)
+++ debian/changelog (copie de travail)
@@ -2,6 +2,10 @@
* Fix setting the multiarch names for m68k, powerpcspe and sh4.
+ [ Sylvestre Ledru]
+ * Drop the unnecessary dependency of libstdc++6-4.5-dev on g++-4.5
+(Cl
Package: src:gcc-4.6
Version: 4.6.1-11
Severity: serious
Hello,
gcc-4.6 fails to build from sources under ia64 with the error:
/build/buildd-gcc-4.6_4.6.1-11-ia64-x4uC7x/gcc-4.6-4.6.1/build/./gcc/xgcc
-B/build/buildd-gcc-4.6_4.6.1-11-ia64-x4uC7x/gcc-4.6-4.6.1/build/./gcc/
-B/usr/ia64-linux-gnu
forwarded 809512 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68668
thanks
To be clear, this is a bug in gcc.
S
Package: isl
Severity: wishlist
Hello Matthias,
It would be nice if you could package the release 0.12.
This version is needed for LLVM Toolchain Snapshot.
Thanks,
Sylvestre
-- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (600, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'
On 14/09/2014 00:50, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm going to privately rent a VM from BigV.io for approximately one week
> to do some Debian GNU/kFreeBSD work:
> * to test jessie d-i, particularly partman-zfs
> * clang-3.4, #759303: Does not have multiarch include paths on !linux
> *
Source: amdgcn-tools
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
We would like to remove llvm-toolchain-17 and this package uses LLVM 17.
Please update to 19 (preferred) or 18
Thanks
Sylvestre
-- System Information:
Debian Release: trixie/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (600, '
t;> Hi,
>>
>> On Thu, 12 Dec 2024 12:05:59 +0100 Matthias Klose wrote:
>>> On 12.12.24 00:07, Bastian Germann wrote:
>>>> On Fri, 4 Oct 2024 18:50:41 +0200 Sylvestre Ledru
>>> > wrote:
>>>>> We would like to remove llvm-toolchain-17
Le 10/01/2025 à 12:08, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort a écrit :
> Sylvestre, can those be added back, so
> that amdgcn-tools can move to a newer llvm?
Sure, do you know how to do that?
I don't think it was intentional
Thanks
S
Le 26/04/2025 à 15:51, Kurt Roeckx a écrit :
On Fri, Jan 10, 2025 at 12:08:39PM +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
I don't see in the changelog for llvm 18 or 19 that the targets were
removed, so perhaps the removal was unintentional? Sylvestre, can those be
added back, so that amdgcn-tools
Le 27/04/2025 à 03:53, Matthias Klose a écrit :
On 27.04.25 00:07, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
and what is wrong with amdgcn-tools? I can build with -18
sure, you can, it's just a package providing symlinks. and then gcc-13
ftbfs, because some gcn targets are missing.
Sorry but the
35 matches
Mail list logo
