Bug#122103: probably you

Do not ignore me pleaase, I faound your email somewhere and now decided to writeb you. I am coming to your place in few weeks and thought we can meet each othber. Let me know if you do bnot mind. I am a nice pretty girl. Don't breply to this email. Email me daireclty at [EMAIL PROTECTED] --

Re: i said something

our records are up to date. http://www.lending-tresm.net/index.php?refid=windsor We look forward to helping you reach your goals. --Doug Gage Senior Financial Analyst - LMR Inc. Did this reach you in error? please let us know so you won't recieve again: http://www.lending-tresm.net/

Re: important part throughout

issue at this time. Confirm your details on our secure form to ensure our records are accurate and we will be in touch within a few days via the method of your choice. http://www.lendxu-now.net/index.php?refid=windsor --Doug Tackett Financial Advisor - eLMR Inc. Did this reach you in error

Bug#112237: can't link against /usr/lib/libstdc++-2-libc6.1-1-2.9.0.so

on: ii libc6 2.2.4-1 GNU C Library: Shared libraries and Timezone data $ uname -a Linux balder 2.2.18pre21 #2 Thu Apr 19 13:05:01 EDT 2001 i686 unknown -- (__) Doug Alcorn (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lathi.net) oo / PGP 02B3 1E26 BCF2 9AAF 93F1 61D7

Bug#112237: forgot work-around

I forgot to add that if I link with just '-lstdc++' and not '-lstdc++-2-libc6.1-2.9.0' it links fine.

Bug#112237: compiler versions.

Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Fri, Sep 14, 2001 at 01:23:57PM -0400, Doug Alcorn wrote: > > > > I forgot to add that if I link with just '-lstdc++' and not > > '-lstdc++-2-libc6.1-2.9.0' it links fine. > > Wait

Bug#112237: compiler versions.

available with the contents of sources.list E: Package libstdc++2.9-glibc2.1-dev has no installation candidate $ dpkg -L libstdc++2.9-glibc2.1 | egrep '*\.a$' -- (__) Doug Alcorn (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lathi.net) oo / PGP 02B3 1E26 BCF2 9AAF 93F1 61D7 450C B264 3E63 D