Hm.
According to upstream documentation, -EL is supposed to be supported
by the compiler driver:
https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/MIPS-Options.html
bye,
//mirabilos
--
"Using Lynx is like wearing a really good pair of shades: cuts out
the glare and harmful UV (ultra-vanity), and you feel
Dixi quod…
>According to upstream documentation, -EL is supposed to be supported
>by the compiler driver:
OK so it’s not the compiler *driver*…
(sid_mips64el-dchroot)tg@eller:~$ mips64el-linux-gnuabi64-gcc hi.c -EL
(sid_mips64el-dchroot)tg@eller:~$ mips64el-linux-gnuabi64-gcc hi.c -specs
"/usr/
Dixi quod…
>(sid_mips64el-dchroot)tg@eller:~$ mips64el-linux-gnuabi64-gcc hi.c -EL
>(sid_mips64el-dchroot)tg@eller:~$ mips64el-linux-gnuabi64-gcc hi.c -specs
>"/usr/lib/mips64el-linux-musl/musl-gcc.specs"
>mips64el-linux-gnuabi64-gcc: error: unrecognized command-line option '-EL'
>(sid_mips64el-d
reassign 1050429 gcc-13 13.2.0-2
notfound 1050429 12.3.0-8
affects 1050429 musl-tools
thanks
Dixi quod…
>The -EL is not even musl-specific?!
>
>(sid_mips64el-dchroot)tg@eller:~$ cat
>"/usr/lib/mips64el-linux-musl/musl-gcc.specs"
[…]
Worse, doing mips64el-linux-gnuabi64-gcc{,-12} -dumpspecs and
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 1050429 gcc-13 13.2.0-2
Bug #1050429 [musl-tools] musl: unusable on mipsel, mips64el:
mipsel-linux-gnu-gcc: unrecognised command-line option '-EL'
Bug reassigned from package 'musl-tools' to 'gcc-13'.
No longer marked as found in version
LAST_UPDATED: Obtained from git: releases/gcc-12.3.0 revision
8fc1a49c9312b05d925b7d21f1d2145d70818151
Native configuration is arm-unknown-linux-gnueabi
=== libatomic tests ===
Running target unix
=== libatomic Summary ===
# of expected passes44
#
6 matches
Mail list logo
