Bug#954826: libgcc-8-dev: depends on unavailable version of libgcc-s1

2020-03-24 Thread Matthias Klose
On 3/24/20 6:46 AM, Sven Joachim wrote: > Package: libgcc-8-dev > Version: 8.4.0-2 > Severity: grave > > The latest version of gcc-8 is not installable because libgcc-8-dev > depends on libgcc-s1 (>= 1:8.4.0-2), but the version of libgcc-s1 in the > archive does not have an epoch and is therefore

Bug#919141: marked as done (gcc-8-cross: please support binnmu)

2020-03-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 24 Mar 2020 12:07:34 + with message-id and subject line Bug#954831: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #919141, regarding gcc-8-cross: please support binnmu to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt w

Bug#924325: marked as done (gcc-8-cross: FTBFS for unknown reasons)

2020-03-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 24 Mar 2020 12:07:34 + with message-id and subject line Bug#954831: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #924325, regarding gcc-8-cross: FTBFS for unknown reasons to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dea

Bug#928424: marked as done (gcc-8-cross: Does not honor parallel=n properly in DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS)

2020-03-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 24 Mar 2020 12:07:34 + with message-id and subject line Bug#954831: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #928424, regarding gcc-8-cross: Does not honor parallel=n properly in DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Bug#954515: marked as done (gcc-8-cross: FTBFS: x86_64-linux-gnu-ld: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpthread.so.0: undefined reference to `__twalk_r@GLIBC_PRIVATE')

2020-03-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 24 Mar 2020 12:07:34 + with message-id and subject line Bug#954831: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #954515, regarding gcc-8-cross: FTBFS: x86_64-linux-gnu-ld: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpthread.so.0: undefined reference to `__twalk_r@G

Bug#899088: marked as done (gcc-8-cross-ports: provide riscv32 cross compiler)

2020-03-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 24 Mar 2020 12:09:06 + with message-id and subject line Bug#954831: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #899088, regarding gcc-8-cross-ports: provide riscv32 cross compiler to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem h

gcc-8_8.4.0-3_amd64.changes REJECTED

2020-03-24 Thread Debian FTP Masters
gcc-8-base: lintian output: 'gzip-file-is-not-multi-arch-same-safe usr/share/doc/gcc-8-base/changelog.Debian.gz', automatically rejected package. gcc-8-base: If you have a good reason, you may override this lintian tag. libstdc++-8-dev: lintian output: 'gzip-file-is-not-multi-arch-same-safe us

Bug#954831: Removed package(s) from unstable

2020-03-24 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Version: 27+rm Dear submitter, as the package gcc-8-cross-ports has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/954831

Bug#954831: Removed package(s) from unstable

2020-03-24 Thread Debian FTP Masters
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: cpp-8-aarch64-linux-gnu | 8.4.0-1cross1 | amd64, i386, ppc64el cpp-8-arm-linux-gnueabi | 8.4.0-1cross1 | amd64, arm64, i386, ppc64el cpp-8-arm-linux-gnueabihf | 8.4.0-1cross1 | amd64, arm64

Bug#954831: Removed package(s) from unstable

2020-03-24 Thread Debian FTP Masters
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: cpp-8-alpha-linux-gnu | 8.4.0-1cross1 | amd64, i386 cpp-8-hppa-linux-gnu | 8.4.0-1cross1 | amd64, i386 cpp-8-m68k-linux-gnu | 8.4.0-1cross1 | amd64, i386 cpp-8-powerpc-linux-gnu | 8.4.0-1cr

Bug#954831: Removed package(s) from unstable

2020-03-24 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Version: 33+rm Dear submitter, as the package gcc-8-cross has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/954831 The ve

Bug#954438: marked as done (libgccjit0: GCCJIT leads to linking error)

2020-03-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 24 Mar 2020 13:06:09 + with message-id and subject line Bug#954438: fixed in gcc-10 10-20200324-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #954438, regarding libgccjit0: GCCJIT leads to linking error to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Bug#954751: marked as done (libgcc-10-dev: Missing include/sanitizer/)

2020-03-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 24 Mar 2020 13:06:10 + with message-id and subject line Bug#954751: fixed in gcc-10 10-20200324-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #954751, regarding libgcc-10-dev: Missing include/sanitizer/ to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Processing of gcc-10_10-20200324-1_source.changes

2020-03-24 Thread Debian FTP Masters
gcc-10_10-20200324-1_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: gcc-10_10-20200324-1.dsc gcc-10_10-20200324.orig.tar.gz gcc-10_10-20200324-1.debian.tar.xz gcc-10_10-20200324-1_source.buildinfo Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host

gcc-10_10-20200324-1_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

2020-03-24 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2020 13:38:16 +0100 Source: gcc-10 Architecture: source Version: 10-20200324-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian GCC Maintainers Changed-By: Matthias Klose Closes: 954438 954751

gcc-8_8.4.0-3_amd64.changes REJECTED

2020-03-24 Thread Debian FTP Masters
gcc-8-base: lintian output: 'gzip-file-is-not-multi-arch-same-safe usr/share/doc/gcc-8-base/changelog.Debian.gz', automatically rejected package. gcc-8-base: If you have a good reason, you may override this lintian tag. libstdc++-8-dev: lintian output: 'gzip-file-is-not-multi-arch-same-safe us

Results for 7.5.0 (Debian 7.5.0-6) testsuite on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu

2020-03-24 Thread Matthias Klose
LAST_UPDATED: Obtained from SVN: tags/gcc_7_5_0_release revision 278198 === acats tests === === acats Summary === # of expected passes2320 # of unexpected failures0 Native configuration is x86_64-pc-linux-gnu === brig tests ===

Results for 7.5.0 (Debian 7.5.0-6) testsuite on arm-unknown-linux-gnueabihf

2020-03-24 Thread Matthias Klose
LAST_UPDATED: Obtained from SVN: tags/gcc_7_5_0_release revision 278198 Native configuration is arm-unknown-linux-gnueabihf === libatomic tests === Running target unix === libatomic Summary for unix === # of expected passes44 # of unsupported tests

Results for 7.5.0 (Debian 7.5.0-6) testsuite on aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu

2020-03-24 Thread Matthias Klose
LAST_UPDATED: Obtained from SVN: tags/gcc_7_5_0_release revision 278198 Native configuration is aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu === libatomic tests === Running target unix === libatomic Summary for unix === # of expected passes54 Running target unix/-fst

Results for 7.5.0 (Debian 7.5.0-6) testsuite on powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu

2020-03-24 Thread Matthias Klose
LAST_UPDATED: Obtained from SVN: tags/gcc_7_5_0_release revision 278198 === acats tests === === acats Summary === # of expected passes2320 # of unexpected failures0 Native configuration is powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu === g++ t

Results for 7.5.0 (Debian 7.5.0-6) testsuite on i686-pc-linux-gnu

2020-03-24 Thread Matthias Klose
LAST_UPDATED: Obtained from SVN: tags/gcc_7_5_0_release revision 278198 === acats tests === === acats Summary === # of expected passes2320 # of unexpected failures0 Native configuration is i686-pc-linux-gnu === brig tests ===

Results for 7.5.0 (Debian 7.5.0-6) testsuite on s390x-ibm-linux-gnu

2020-03-24 Thread Matthias Klose
LAST_UPDATED: Obtained from SVN: tags/gcc_7_5_0_release revision 278198 === acats tests === === acats Summary === # of expected passes2320 # of unexpected failures0 Native configuration is s390x-ibm-linux-gnu === g++ tests ===

Results for 8.4.0 (Debian 8.4.0-2) testsuite on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu

2020-03-24 Thread Matthias Klose
LAST_UPDATED: Obtained from git: releases/gcc-8.4.0 revision 8cd3bffead2ed1d1998c190865694f920fbc93ab === acats tests === === acats Summary === # of expected passes2320 # of unexpected failures0 Native configuration is x86_64-pc-linux-gnu

Results for 8.4.0 (Debian 8.4.0-2) testsuite on aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu

2020-03-24 Thread Matthias Klose
LAST_UPDATED: Obtained from git: releases/gcc-8.4.0 revision 8cd3bffead2ed1d1998c190865694f920fbc93ab Native configuration is aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu === libatomic tests === Running target unix === libatomic Summary for unix === # of expected passes

Results for 8.4.0 (Debian 8.4.0-2) testsuite on arm-unknown-linux-gnueabihf

2020-03-24 Thread Matthias Klose
LAST_UPDATED: Obtained from git: releases/gcc-8.4.0 revision 8cd3bffead2ed1d1998c190865694f920fbc93ab Native configuration is arm-unknown-linux-gnueabihf === libatomic tests === Running target unix === libatomic Summary for unix === # of expected passes

Results for 8.4.0 (Debian 8.4.0-2) testsuite on i686-pc-linux-gnu

2020-03-24 Thread Matthias Klose
LAST_UPDATED: Obtained from git: releases/gcc-8.4.0 revision 8cd3bffead2ed1d1998c190865694f920fbc93ab === acats tests === === acats Summary === # of expected passes2320 # of unexpected failures0 Native configuration is i686-pc-linux-gnu

Results for 8.4.0 (Debian 8.4.0-2) testsuite on powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu

2020-03-24 Thread Matthias Klose
LAST_UPDATED: Obtained from git: releases/gcc-8.4.0 revision 8cd3bffead2ed1d1998c190865694f920fbc93ab === acats tests === === acats Summary === # of expected passes2320 # of unexpected failures0 Native configuration is powerpc64le-unknown-linux

Results for 8.4.0 (Debian 8.4.0-2) testsuite on s390x-ibm-linux-gnu

2020-03-24 Thread Matthias Klose
LAST_UPDATED: Obtained from git: releases/gcc-8.4.0 revision 8cd3bffead2ed1d1998c190865694f920fbc93ab === acats tests === === acats Summary === # of expected passes2320 # of unexpected failures0 Native configuration is s390x-ibm-linux-gnu

Results for 9.3.0 (Debian 9.3.0-7) testsuite on arm-unknown-linux-gnueabi

2020-03-24 Thread Matthias Klose
LAST_UPDATED: Obtained from git: releases/gcc-9.3.0 revision 4212a6a3e44f870412d9025eeb323fd4f50a61da Native configuration is arm-unknown-linux-gnueabi === libatomic tests === Running target unix === libatomic Summary === # of expected passes44 # o

Processing of gcc-10-cross_5_source.changes

2020-03-24 Thread Debian FTP Masters
gcc-10-cross_5_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: gcc-10-cross_5.dsc gcc-10-cross_5.tar.xz gcc-10-cross_5_source.buildinfo Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)

gcc-10-cross_5_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

2020-03-24 Thread Debian FTP Masters
) unstable; urgency=medium . * Build using gcc 10-20200324-1. Checksums-Sha1: 2b5d28c2f02539dac6a77545d2bc1075ff3051a5 34319 gcc-10-cross_5.dsc b1b9e523b03d0ef9c69180a6f8f776ed389c3c2d 41980 gcc-10-cross_5.tar.xz 3b2970f0a2d849b8cea44d5836039d6bf683 18184 gcc-10-cross_5_source.buildinfo

Processing of gcc-10-cross-ports_4_source.changes

2020-03-24 Thread Debian FTP Masters
gcc-10-cross-ports_4_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: gcc-10-cross-ports_4.dsc gcc-10-cross-ports_4.tar.xz gcc-10-cross-ports_4_source.buildinfo Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)

gcc-10-cross-ports_4_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

2020-03-24 Thread Debian FTP Masters
-ports (4) unstable; urgency=medium . * Build using gcc 10-20200324-1. Checksums-Sha1: f39a5cc367463483bb5b153b32aac1c5d7a22294 35150 gcc-10-cross-ports_4.dsc 7359097516b689db2071392e9a4eca24e4e56ab3 42236 gcc-10-cross-ports_4.tar.xz c3d1dd06f94fabe91bf18b8d2ffaecf3ca99b3c7 17022 gcc-10-cross

Processing of gcc-9_9.3.0-8_source.changes

2020-03-24 Thread Debian FTP Masters
gcc-9_9.3.0-8_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: gcc-9_9.3.0-8.dsc gcc-9_9.3.0-8.debian.tar.xz gcc-9_9.3.0-8_source.buildinfo Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)

Bug#954750: marked as done (libgcc-9-dev: Missing include/sanitizer/)

2020-03-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
) unstable; urgency=medium . * Update to git 20200324 from the gcc-9 branch. - Fix PR tree-optimization/94125, PR target/90763 (PPC). * libgcc-N-dev: Include sanitizer headers again. Closes: #954750. * gm2: Define lang_register_spec_functions for jit. Addresses: #954438.

gcc-9_9.3.0-8_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

2020-03-24 Thread Debian FTP Masters
(9.3.0-8) unstable; urgency=medium . * Update to git 20200324 from the gcc-9 branch. - Fix PR tree-optimization/94125, PR target/90763 (PPC). * libgcc-N-dev: Include sanitizer headers again. Closes: #954750. * gm2: Define lang_register_spec_functions for jit. Addresses: #954438

Bug#856274: marked as done (gnat-BV: gnatchop fails to execute (ARCH-)?gcc-BV-BV)

2020-03-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 24 Mar 2020 21:39:38 + with message-id and subject line Bug#923982: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #856274, regarding gnat-BV: gnatchop fails to execute (ARCH-)?gcc-BV-BV to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the proble

Bug#870375: marked as done (gcc-7: Native gdc cross-builds fail)

2020-03-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 24 Mar 2020 21:39:38 + with message-id and subject line Bug#923982: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #870375, regarding gcc-7: Native gdc cross-builds fail to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt

Bug#427108: marked as done ([Fixed in 8] Bug box Program_Error exp_disp.adb: explicit raise)

2020-03-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 24 Mar 2020 21:39:38 + with message-id and subject line Bug#923982: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #427108, regarding [Fixed in 8] Bug box Program_Error exp_disp.adb: explicit raise to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

Bug#884431: marked as done (gcc-7: miscompile pthread_barrier.c from glibc with -mcpu=ultrasparc)

2020-03-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 24 Mar 2020 21:39:38 + with message-id and subject line Bug#923982: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #884431, regarding gcc-7: miscompile pthread_barrier.c from glibc with -mcpu=ultrasparc to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Bug#882490: marked as done (gcc: Tune default --param ggc-min-expand for 32-bit arches)

2020-03-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 24 Mar 2020 21:39:38 + with message-id and subject line Bug#923982: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #882490, regarding gcc: Tune default --param ggc-min-expand for 32-bit arches to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#853709: marked as done (xbubble: ftbfs with GCC-7)

2020-03-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 24 Mar 2020 21:39:38 + with message-id and subject line Bug#923982: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #853709, regarding xbubble: ftbfs with GCC-7 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If t

Bug#887453: marked as done (libunwind: please disable lzma on ia64)

2020-03-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 24 Mar 2020 21:39:38 + with message-id and subject line Bug#923982: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #887453, regarding libunwind: please disable lzma on ia64 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dea

Bug#866369: marked as done (gdc unittest fails to build on ARM32)

2020-03-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 24 Mar 2020 21:39:38 + with message-id and subject line Bug#923982: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #866369, regarding gdc unittest fails to build on ARM32 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt

Bug#881288: marked as done (gcc-7 fails to patch when old distribution detected)

2020-03-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 24 Mar 2020 21:39:38 + with message-id and subject line Bug#923982: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #881288, regarding gcc-7 fails to patch when old distribution detected to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem

Bug#886099: marked as done (gcc-7: backport PR target/82981)

2020-03-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 24 Mar 2020 21:39:38 + with message-id and subject line Bug#923982: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #886099, regarding gcc-7: backport PR target/82981 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with

Bug#879703: marked as done (gcc-7: static development libraries miss debug information)

2020-03-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 24 Mar 2020 21:39:38 + with message-id and subject line Bug#923982: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #879703, regarding gcc-7: static development libraries miss debug information to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#881939: marked as done (gcc: disable D when cross build native GCC)

2020-03-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 24 Mar 2020 21:39:38 + with message-id and subject line Bug#923982: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #881939, regarding gcc: disable D when cross build native GCC to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Bug#888394: marked as done (GCC bootstrap comparison failure build the D frontend on alpha)

2020-03-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 24 Mar 2020 21:39:38 + with message-id and subject line Bug#923982: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #888394, regarding GCC bootstrap comparison failure build the D frontend on alpha to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

Bug#895452: marked as done (gcc-7: libquadmath is disabled for gcc 7.3.0 on powerpc64-linux-gnu)

2020-03-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 24 Mar 2020 21:39:38 + with message-id and subject line Bug#923982: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #895452, regarding gcc-7: libquadmath is disabled for gcc 7.3.0 on powerpc64-linux-gnu to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Bug#901836: marked as done (-mieee-fp broken on i386)

2020-03-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 24 Mar 2020 21:39:38 + with message-id and subject line Bug#923982: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #901836, regarding -mieee-fp broken on i386 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If th

Bug#894302: marked as done (g++-7: Compiler generates wrong code with warning options)

2020-03-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 24 Mar 2020 21:39:38 + with message-id and subject line Bug#923982: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #894302, regarding g++-7: Compiler generates wrong code with warning options to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the p

Bug#923982: Removed package(s) from unstable

2020-03-24 Thread Debian FTP Masters
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: cpp-7 |7.5.0-5 | mips64el, mipsel cpp-7 |7.5.0-6 | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, i386, mipsel, ppc64el, s390x g++-7 |7.5.0-5 | mips64el, mipsel g++-7 |7.5

gcc-8_8.4.0-3_amd64.changes REJECTED

2020-03-24 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Signature for changes file was already seen at 2020-03-24 16:43:16.843664. Please refresh the signature of the changes file if you want to upload it again. === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which add

Bug#954898: libgccjit0: libgccjit segmentation fault

2020-03-24 Thread Gong-Yi Liao
Package: libgccjit0 Version: 10-20200324-1 Severity: important Dear Maintainer, I tried to complie GCC JIT's offiical hello world example shown on https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/jit/intro/tutorial01.html Compilation worked well without any error message, however, when I ran the gene

Bug#954806: Wrong copyright years in attached tarball

2020-03-24 Thread Asher Gordon
Asher Gordon writes: > Since I was not able write a simpler program that triggers the bug, I > have attached the source tarball (mu.tar.gz). I copied the copyright notices in that tarball from another project and forgot to change the copyright years. It should really be 2020. (It probably makes