can you help to reject
gcc-8-cross-mipsen_1_amd64.changes
too.
In _1 I forget to upload binary=all packages, due to lack of -A option
of sbuild.
Debian FTP Masters 于2018年8月21日周二 下午1:13写道：
>
>
> gcc-8-mipsisa32r6el-linux-gnu_8.2.0-4cross1_amd64.deb: Does not match file
> already existing in t
Control: tags -1 important
Control: forwarded -1 https://gcc.gnu.org/PR87036
On 20.08.2018 21:53, Lumin wrote:
> This is the minimal code for repro #906753:
>
> OK with -O0, FAIL with -O2 on i386, ppc64el, ...
that always failed on i386 and ppc64el with -O2, so not a regression. You talked
about
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 important
Unknown tag/s: important.
Recognized are: patch wontfix moreinfo unreproducible help security upstream
pending confirmed ipv6 lfs d-i l10n newcomer a11y ftbfs fixed-upstream fixed
fixed-in-experimental sid experimental potato woody sarge sarge-ign
Your message dated Tue, 21 Aug 2018 10:20:21 +0200
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#906753: Acknowledgement (GCC's -O2 optimization breaks
floating point precision or something else)
has caused the Debian Bug report #906753,
regarding GCC's -O2 optimization breaks floating point precision
As requested by YunQiang Su via mail
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
concerns.
gcc-8-cross-mipsen_2_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
gcc-8-cross-mipsen_2.dsc
gcc-8-cross-mipsen_2.tar.xz
cpp-8-mips64-linux-gnuabi64_8.2.0-4cross1_amd64.deb
cpp-8-mipsisa32r6-linux-gnu_8.2.0-4cross1_amd64.deb
cpp-8-mipsisa32r6el-linux-gnu_8.2.0-4cro
Signature for changes file was already seen at 2018-08-21 05:13:43.978918.
Please refresh the signature of the changes file if you want to upload it again.
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which add
gcc-6_6.4.0-20_s390x.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
cpp-6-dbgsym_6.4.0-20_s390x.deb
cpp-6_6.4.0-20_s390x.deb
g++-6-dbgsym_6.4.0-20_s390x.deb
g++-6-multilib_6.4.0-20_s390x.deb
g++-6_6.4.0-20_s390x.deb
gcc-6-base_6.4.0-20_s390x.deb
gcc-6-dbgsym_6.4.0-20
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2018 17:48:05 +0200
Source: gcc-6
Binary: gcc-6-base libgcc-6-dev libgcc4 libgcc4-dbg lib64gcc-6-dev
lib32gcc-6-dev libn32gcc-6-dev libx32gcc-6-dev gcc-6 gcc-6-multilib
gcc-6-test-results gcc-6-plugin-dev
gcc-8-cross-mipsen_2_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
gcc-8-cross-mipsen_2.dsc
gcc-8-cross-mipsen_2.tar.xz
cpp-8-mips64-linux-gnuabi64_8.2.0-4cross1_amd64.deb
cpp-8-mipsisa32r6-linux-gnu_8.2.0-4cross1_amd64.deb
cpp-8-mipsisa32r6el-linux-gnu_8.2.0-4cro
binary:cpp-8-mipsisa32r6-linux-gnu is NEW.
binary:cpp-8-mipsisa32r6el-linux-gnu is NEW.
binary:cpp-8-mipsisa64r6-linux-gnuabi64 is NEW.
binary:cpp-8-mipsisa64r6el-linux-gnuabi64 is NEW.
binary:g++-8-mipsisa32r6-linux-gnu is NEW.
binary:g++-8-mipsisa32r6el-linux-gnu is NEW.
binary:g++-8-mipsisa64r6-
The version of the source package (2) does not show up in the binary version.
So neither rebuilds with a new changelog, nor bin-nmus will work. You already
add a "cross1", so why not add it there?
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were reje
On 22.08.2018 06:00, Bastian Blank wrote:
>
> The version of the source package (2) does not show up in the binary version.
> So neither rebuilds with a new changelog, nor bin-nmus will work. You already
> add a "cross1", so why not add it there?
that's how it is done for all cross packages. The
13 matches
Mail list logo
