Bug#631906: gcc-4.4: cannot find -lgcc_s after upgrade to 4.4.6-6

2011-06-28 Thread Raphael Geissert
Package: gcc-4.4 Version: 4.4.6-6 Severity: grave Hi, After upgrading to 4.4.6-6, gcc won't build binaries: $ cat t.c #include int main() { printf("'lo world\n"); return 0; } $ make t CC=gcc-4.4 gcc-4.4 t.c -o t /usr/bin/ld.bfd.real: cannot find -lgcc_s $ dpkg-query -W -f '${Pa

Bug#631906: gcc-4.4: cannot find -lgcc_s after upgrade to 4.4.6-6

2011-06-28 Thread Ludovic Brenta
Thanks for submitting this bug for gcc-4.4; a similar one (#631627) exists for gcc-4.6. My analysis of this bug (with workaround) is here: http://lists.debian.org/debian-gcc/2011/06/msg00209.html -- Ludovic Brenta. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org wit

Bug#631926: /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lgcc_s

2011-06-28 Thread Marius Mikucionis
Package: gcc-4.5 Version: 4.5.3-3 Severity: important Basically after recent upgrade I cannot compile anything. Here is a simple procedure: Get a small C program (there is nothing special about it): $ wget "http://burtleburtle.net/bob/c/jenny.c"; Compile: $ gcc-4.5 jenny.c /usr/bin/ld: cannot

Bug#631926: /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lgcc_s

2011-06-28 Thread Matthias Klose
On 06/28/2011 12:54 PM, Marius Mikucionis wrote: > Package: gcc-4.5 > Version: 4.5.3-3 > Severity: important > > Basically after recent upgrade I cannot compile anything. update to gcc-4.6 from unstable for now. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of

Bug#631906: gcc-4.4: cannot find -lgcc_s after upgrade to 4.4.6-6

2011-06-28 Thread Matthias Klose
On 06/28/2011 09:50 AM, Raphael Geissert wrote: > Package: gcc-4.4 > Version: 4.4.6-6 > Severity: grave > > Hi, > > After upgrading to 4.4.6-6, gcc won't build binaries: > > $ cat t.c > #include > > int > main() > { > printf("'lo world\n"); > return 0; > } > > $ make t CC=gcc-4.4 > gc

Bug#631926: /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lgcc_s

2011-06-28 Thread Marius Mikucionis
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 1:11 PM, Matthias Klose wrote: > On 06/28/2011 12:54 PM, Marius Mikucionis wrote: > > Package: gcc-4.5 > > Version: 4.5.3-3 > > Severity: important > > > > Basically after recent upgrade I cannot compile anything. > > update to gcc-4.6 from unstable for now. > Thanks for

Processed: gcc-defaults version 4:4.4.5-1 non-functional on Wheezy (missing libgcc_s.so)

2011-06-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 631627 wheezy pending Bug #631627 [gcc-4.6] gcc-defaults version 4:4.4.5-1 non-functional on Wheezy (missing libgcc_s.so) Bug #631817 [gcc-4.6] libgcc1: missing link libgccc_s.so -> libgcc_s.so.1 Added tag(s) wheezy and pending. Added tag(s)

Bug#631627: gcc-defaults version 4:4.4.5-1 non-functional on Wheezy (missing libgcc_s.so)

2011-06-28 Thread Ludovic Brenta
tags 631627 wheezy pending found 631627 gcc-4.6/4.6.0-10 notfound 631627 gcc-4.6/4.6.0-12 severity 631627 important thanks This bug is present only in testing and will disappear when libgcc1 (>= 1:4.6.0-12) migrates to testing. The version currently in unstable is 1:4.6.1-1. -- Ludo

Processed: Re: Bug#631926: /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lgcc_s

2011-06-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 631926 wheezy pending Bug #631926 [gcc-4.5] /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lgcc_s Added tag(s) wheezy and pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 631926: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.c

Bug#631926: /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lgcc_s

2011-06-28 Thread Ludovic Brenta
tags 631926 wheezy pending thanks This bug affects testing/wheezy only (not sid) and can be closed when libgcc1 (>= 1:4.6.0-12) migrates to testing. The current version in sid is 1:4.6.1-1. -- Ludovic Brenta. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a

Bug#615157: Thank you (Re: gcc-4.6: -Wunused-but-set-variable -Werror does not imply -Werror=unused-but-set-variable)

2011-06-28 Thread Jonathan Nieder
Matthias Klose wrote: >* Stop passing -Wno-error=unused-but-set-parameter and > -Wno-error=unused-but-set-variable if -Werror is present. > This was a temporary workaround introduced in 4.6.0~rc1-2. Closes: > #615157. Yippee! Indeed, -Werror works as expected now. Thanks for your