Bug#552688: enable hardening defaults

2009-10-28 Thread Kees Cook
Package: gcc-4.4 Version: 4.4.2-1 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch Hello! Based on the ubuntu-devel discussions[1], there are no objections yet from other developers about enabling the hardened compiler defaults in Debian. Thanks, -Kees [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-gcc/2009/10/msg00186.htm

gcc-multiarch.dpatch not supprot sh4?

2009-10-28 Thread Nobuhiro Iwamatsu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I am now trying to run Debian on Renesas SH(sh4) CPU. http://buildd.debian-ports.org/status/architecture.php?suite=unstable&a=sh4&buildd= SH4 cannot build some packages, because include search path does not have /usr/include/sh4-linux-gnu. gc

Bug#550748: Acknowledgement (Cannot remove gcc-4.3-base)

2009-10-28 Thread Robert de Bath
Severity: wishlist Okay, sorry, it appears that this packages is nothing to do with the compiler itself, it just contains a few text files. So I've downgraded the bug and now just wish it didn't have such a confusing name. Say gcc-4.3-version-list, not something that implies that it contains

Re: Switch on compiler hardening defaults

2009-10-28 Thread Christoph Anton Mitterer
On Tue, 2009-10-27 at 22:19 -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > Well, the issue raised in LKML is that you absolutely should *not* enable > -fstack-protector-all unless you _really_ know what you're doing, and most > certainly not by default. It has nothing to do with -fstack-protector, ju

Bug#552764: no-copyright-file

2009-10-28 Thread Manoj Srivastava
Package: libgcj-bc Version: 4.3.3-9+nmu1 Severity: serious User: lintian-ma...@debian.org Usertags: no-copyright-file Justification: Each binary package has to include a plain file /usr/share/doc/pkg/copyright Refer to Debian Policy Manual section 12.5 (Copyright information) for d

Bug#552959: ppl: FTBFS: build blocks

2009-10-28 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
Source: ppl Version: 0.10.2-3 Severity: serious User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20091028 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > make[7]: Entering directory > `/buil

Possible problems in your Debian packages

2009-10-28 Thread DDPOMail robot
This is an automated mail. These mails are sent twice a month. For more information about these mails, refer to http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/DdpoByMail === gcj-4.4: = 1 bug(s) that should be fixed soon: - #552710 gcj-4.4: FTBFS: Unsatisfiable build-depende

Bug#552778: udev: preinst fails to detect kernel symbols ???sys_inotify_init??? and ???sys_signalfd???

2009-10-28 Thread Marco d'Itri
On Oct 28, Ben Finney wrote: Does anybody know why, and if ther are other architecture-specific cases I need to care about? I checked pescetti.d.o which is powerpc, but it has regular symbols. As a workaround you can create /etc/udev/kernel-upgrade and then manually stop/restart udevd. > The sy