Bug#538647: marked as done (g++-4.3: g++ examines second value to "?" always if it is a template)

Your message dated Sun, 26 Jul 2009 08:59:22 +0200 with message-id <87tz100w1h@mid.deneb.enyo.de> and subject line Re: Bug#538647: g++-4.3: g++ examines second value to "?" always if it is a template has caused the Debian Bug report #538647, regarding g++-4.3: g++ examines second value to "?"

gnat-4.4_4.4.0-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: gnat-4.4-base_4.4.0-1_amd64.deb to pool/main/g/gnat-4.4/gnat-4.4-base_4.4.0-1_amd64.deb gnat-4.4_4.4.0-1.diff.gz to pool/main/g/gnat-4.4/gnat-4.4_4.4.0-1.diff.gz gnat-4.4_4.4.0-1.dsc to pool/main/g/gnat-4.4/gnat-4.4_4.4.0-1.dsc gnat-4.4_4.4.0-1_amd64.deb to pool/main/g/gnat-4.4/g

[Bug libgcj/40859] [4.4/4.5 regression] regressions in libjava testsuite on arm-linux

--- Comment #1 from mikpe at it dot uu dot se 2009-07-26 12:54 --- Looks like fallout from revision 144323. As far as I can tell the "warning" is informational (ABI change from 4.3) so should be suppressed or ignored in the test suite. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=

Bug#538647: closed by Florian Weimer (Re: Bug#538647: g++-4.3: g++ examines second value to "?" always if it is a template)

* Philip Ashmore: /*HERE*/enum { value = (wanted <= guess) ? result : next_value_type::value }; Not a bug. You need to implement your own conditional operator at the template level to make this work. The version with ?: is not valid C++ Not valid C++ ? My C++ compiler (g++) disagr

[Bug bootstrap/37739] [4.4 Regression] bootstrap broken with core gcc > gcc-4.2.x

--- Comment #29 from giffordj at la dot twcbc dot com 2009-07-26 20:28 --- STAGE1_CFLAGS="-g -O2" is a workaround, -O1 gave failure later in the build. -O2 built GCC all the way through, with only one unexpected testsuite failure. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3773