Hi all,
I'm looking for someone who can review patch attached to this bug report [1].
I've applyed it locally and it seems to work fine but I'm not specialist in
java-gcj-compat and may not see some corner cases.
Doko, you seems to be the last Uploader of java-gcj-compat package, could you
plea
Am Montag, den 09.03.2009, 20:49 +0100 schrieb Damien Raude-Morvan:
> I'm looking for someone who can review patch attached to this bug report [1].
> I've applyed it locally and it seems to work fine but I'm not specialist in
> java-gcj-compat
Well, the main point is, that rebuild-gcj-db is call
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> #
> # bts-link upstream status pull for source package gnat-4.3
> # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
> #
> user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Setting user to bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package gnat-4.3
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
#
user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org
# remote status report for #494945
# * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR37110
# * remote status changed: WAITING -> RESOLV
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcc-4.3
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
#
user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org
# remote status report for #518751
# * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR36415
# * remote status changed: (?) -> NEW
usertag
5 matches
Mail list logo