On Mon, May 05, 2008 at 09:23:38AM +0200, A Mennucc wrote:
> the original submitter of this bug marked it as wontfix.
> But I think that this bug should be addressed somehow.
Indeed, I think it should be as well
> There are 25 packages that directly rdepend on libffi4, and removing
> libffi4 has
On Tue, May 06, 2008 at 02:40:14PM +0200, Filippo Giunchedi wrote:
> I don't know about the strict requirement of gcc-4.3-base but there are some
> packages build-depending on libffi4-dev and not on libffi5-dev thus a binNMU
> would not be sufficient, namely:
>
> $ grep-dctrl -i -sPackage -FBuild
On Tue, 06 May 2008, Filippo Giunchedi wrote:
> Nevermind, those bugs have been already filed by Raphael.
>
> Regarding packages Depending on binary libffi4 but source not build-depending
> libffi-dev those should be:
binnmus have been filed already, see thread on debian-release:
http://lists.de
On Tue, May 06, 2008 at 02:40:14PM +0200, Filippo Giunchedi wrote:
> On Mon, May 05, 2008 at 09:23:38AM +0200, A Mennucc wrote:
> > the original submitter of this bug marked it as wontfix.
> > But I think that this bug should be addressed somehow.
>
> Indeed, I think it should be as well
There i
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcc-4.1
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
#
user [EMAIL PROTECTED]
# remote status report for #356316
# * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR7302
# * remote status changed: (?) -> ASSIGNED
usertags 356316 + status-AS
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcc-4.2
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
#
user [EMAIL PROTECTED]
# remote status report for #443028
# * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR31947
# * remote status changed: (?) -> NEW
usertags 443028 + status-NEW
#
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcj-4.2
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
#
user [EMAIL PROTECTED]
# remote status report for #399833
# * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR32863
# * remote status changed: (?) -> UNCONFIRMED
usertags 399833 + statu
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcj-4.1
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
#
user [EMAIL PROTECTED]
# remote status report for #255525
# * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR16122
# * remote status changed: (?) -> NEW
usertags 255525 + status-NEW
#
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcc-snapshot
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
#
user [EMAIL PROTECTED]
# remote status report for #336511
# * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR24619
# * remote status changed: (?) -> ASSIGNED
usertags 336511 + sta
On Tue, May 06, 2008 at 07:17:03PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Tue, May 06, 2008 at 02:40:14PM +0200, Filippo Giunchedi wrote:
> > On Mon, May 05, 2008 at 09:23:38AM +0200, A Mennucc wrote:
> > > the original submitter of this bug marked it as wontfix.
> > > But I think that this bug should be
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcc-3.3
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
#
user [EMAIL PROTECTED]
# remote status report for #361637
# * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR12245
# * remote status changed: (?) -> NEW
usertags 361637 + status-NEW
t
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcj-4.3
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
#
user [EMAIL PROTECTED]
# remote status report for #192035
# * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR10632
# * remote status changed: (?) -> NEW
usertags 192035 + status-NEW
#
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcc-4.3
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
#
user [EMAIL PROTECTED]
# remote status report for #36600
# * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR14990
# * remote status changed: (?) -> SUSPENDED
usertags 36600 + status-SU
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcj-4.1
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
#
user [EMAIL PROTECTED]
# remote status report for #255525
# * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR16122
# * remote status changed: (?) -> NEW
usertags 255525 + status-NEW
#
14 matches
Mail list logo