Bug#339356: gnat: Assert_Failure atree.adb:678 on invalid code (mixture of protected object and accept of entry family)

2008-04-24 Thread Jacob Sparre Andersen
I have reproduced the GNAT bug box with GNAT 4.1.2 20061115: % gnatmake -gnat05 -gnatE -gnato -gnatv -gnati1 -gnatf -fstack-check -m gnat_bug.adb gcc-4.1 -c -gnat05 -gnatE -gnato -gnatv -gnati1 -gnatf -fstack-check gnat_bug.adb GNAT 4.1.2 20061115 (prerelease) (Debian 4.1.1-22) Copyright 1992-

Bug#299033: Debian bug #299033: gnat compiler crash

2008-04-24 Thread Jacob Sparre Andersen
I've just attempted to compile the system on a GNAT 4.1 compiler. It fails to compile, but there are no GNAT bug boxes. Greetings, Jacob -- PNG: Pretty Nice Graphics -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: ARM EABI (armel) Objective-C support patches

2008-04-24 Thread Matthias Klose
Julian Brown writes: > Hi, > > I'm working with Andrew Jenner at CodeSourcery to fix Objective-C and > Fortran (gfortran) for the ARM EABI Debian port. These two patches > provide Objective-C support sufficient to run GCC's ObjC testsuite with > zero unexpected failures (as tested with CodeSourcer

ARM EABI (armel) Objective-C support patches

2008-04-24 Thread Julian Brown
Hi, I'm working with Andrew Jenner at CodeSourcery to fix Objective-C and Fortran (gfortran) for the ARM EABI Debian port. These two patches provide Objective-C support sufficient to run GCC's ObjC testsuite with zero unexpected failures (as tested with CodeSourcery's cross-compilation scripts --

ada commit in r3030

2008-04-24 Thread Matthias Klose
Sam, Ludovic, some comments: - please merge the changelog entries into the existing gcc-4.3 entry. - series file checked in? I don't mind converting the patch system to quilt as long as we find a way for the conditional patches and running the autoconf stuff. - all new patches have:

Bug#476645: extra information

2008-04-24 Thread Friedrich Dominicus
Ok, I spend another few hours on this problem, it seems this is a problem with the package management. I reinstalled complete fresh Debian distribution but just choose a a 2.6.22 Kernel, I rebuild this kernel here and used 4.2 vor compiling this kernel. Then I installed the gcc-4.2-multilib also a

Bug#477662: [gcc-4.2] compiled with deprecated -m* options syntax

2008-04-24 Thread Nicolas Noirbent
Package: gcc-4.2 Version: 4.2.3-3 Severity: normal --- Please enter the report below this line. --- From ``gcc -dumpspecs'': [...] *cc1_cpu: %{!mtune*: %{m386:mtune=i386 %n`-m386' is deprecated. Use `-march=i386' or `-mtune=i386' instead. } %{m486:-mtune=i486 %n`-m486' is deprecated. Use `-marc

Bug#477662: marked as done ([gcc-4.2] compiled with deprecated -m* options syntax)

2008-04-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 24 Apr 2008 13:34:37 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Re: Bug#477662: [gcc-4.2] compiled with deprecated -m* options syntax has caused the Debian Bug report #477662, regarding [gcc-4.2] compiled with deprecated -m* options syntax to be marked as d

Re: ada commit in r3030

2008-04-24 Thread Ludovic Brenta
Selon Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Sam, Ludovic, some comments: I'll take all the blame. Sam did submit the patches but I formatted them for Debian and wrote the changelog entries. > - please merge the changelog entries into the existing gcc-4.3 >entry. > - series file checked in?

Bug#467309: marked as done (gij: do not provide java2-runtime)

2008-04-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 24 Apr 2008 15:00:43 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Re: Bug#467309: gij: do not provide java2-runtime has caused the Debian Bug report #467309, regarding gij: do not provide java2-runtime to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#473107: marked as done (should provide /usr/lib/libgfortran.so ?)

2008-04-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 24 Apr 2008 15:04:32 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Re: Bug#473107: should provide /usr/lib/libgfortran.so ? has caused the Debian Bug report #473107, regarding should provide /usr/lib/libgfortran.so ? to be marked as done. This means that you c

Processed: gcc manpages

2008-04-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 467166 gcc-doc-defaults Bug#467166: cpp: /usr/bin/gcc has no manpage Bug reassigned from package `cpp' to `gcc-doc-defaults'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrat

Processing of gcc-4.1_4.1.2-22_multi.changes

2008-04-24 Thread Archive Administrator
gcc-4.1_4.1.2-22_multi.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: cpp-4.1_4.1.2-22_i386.deb libstdc++6-4.1-dev_4.1.2-22_i386.deb cpp-4.1_4.1.2-22_powerpc.deb gcc-4.1-base_4.1.2-22_powerpc.deb gcc-4.1-locales_4.1.2-22_all.deb gcc-4.1-source_4.1.2-22_all.deb libstd

Processing of gcc-defaults_1.70_s390.changes

2008-04-24 Thread Archive Administrator
gcc-defaults_1.70_s390.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: cpp_4.3.0-5_s390.deb gcc_4.3.0-5_s390.deb gcc-multilib_4.3.0-5_s390.deb gnat_4.3.0-5_s390.deb libgnatvsn-dev_4.3.0-5_s390.deb libgnatprj-dev_4.3.0-5_s390.deb gdc_4.1.2-20_s390.deb g++_4.3.0-5_s39

Bug#477738: RM: gdc [sparc] -- NBS; gdc disabled on sparc since gcc-defaults 1.70

2008-04-24 Thread Rene Engelhard
Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal gcc-defaults (1.70) unstable; urgency=low [Matthias Klose] * /usr/share/gcj/debian_defaults: Remove alpha, arm, hppa from gcj_archs, remove alpha from gcj_native_archs, add armel to gcj_archs and gcj_native_archs. * Make GCC-4.3 the default o

gcc-defaults_1.70_s390.changes ACCEPTED

2008-04-24 Thread Debian Installer
Accepted: cpp_4.3.0-5_s390.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-defaults/cpp_4.3.0-5_s390.deb g++-multilib_4.3.0-5_s390.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-defaults/g++-multilib_4.3.0-5_s390.deb g++_4.3.0-5_s390.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-defaults/g++_4.3.0-5_s390.deb gcc-multilib_4.3.0-5_s390.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-def

gcc-4.1_4.1.2-22_multi.changes REJECTED

2008-04-24 Thread Debian Installer
Rejected: g++-4.1-multilib_4.1.2-22_powerpc.deb: no sha1 checksum Rejected: lib64stdc++6-4.1-dbg_4.1.2-22_powerpc.deb: no sha1 checksum Rejected: gcc-4.1-multilib_4.1.2-22_powerpc.deb: no sha1 checksum Rejected: gcc-4.1-base_4.1.2-22_powerpc.deb: no sha1 checksum Rejected: libstdc++6-4.1-pic_4.1.2

Results for 4.1.3 20080420 (prerelease) (Debian 4.1.2-22) testsuite on i486-pc-linux-gnu

2008-04-24 Thread Matthias Klose
LAST_UPDATED: Sun Apr 20 13:12:12 UTC 2008 (revision 134483) Target: i486-linux-gnu gcc version 4.1.3 20080420 (prerelease) (Debian 4.1.2-22) Native configuration is i486-pc-linux-gnu === g++ tests === Running target unix XPASS: g++.old-deja/g++.other/init5.C execution test

Results for 4.1.3 20080420 (prerelease) (Debian 4.1.2-22) testsuite on powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu

2008-04-24 Thread Matthias Klose
LAST_UPDATED: Sun Apr 20 13:12:12 UTC 2008 (revision 134483) Target: powerpc-linux-gnu gcc version 4.1.3 20080420 (prerelease) (Debian 4.1.2-22) Native configuration is powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu === g++ tests === Running target unix === g++ Summary for unix ===

Bug#448789: marked as done (Static libgcj is not supplied for gcj-4.2)

2008-04-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 25 Apr 2008 02:12:49 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Re: Static libgcj is not supplied for gcj-4.2 has caused the Debian Bug report #448789, regarding Static libgcj is not supplied for gcj-4.2 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

Processed: Re: Static libgcj is not supplied for gcj-4.2

2008-04-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 448789 + wontfix Bug#448789: Static libgcj is not supplied for gcj-4.2 There were no tags set. Tags added: wontfix > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrato

Bug#470967: marked as done (gcc-4.2: has no manpage)

2008-04-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 25 Apr 2008 02:15:12 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Re: Bug#470967: gcc-4.2: has no manpage has caused the Debian Bug report #470967, regarding gcc-4.2: has no manpage to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dea