Bug#268115: lauteill

2007-11-20 Thread alan DOMINGOS
Long and big dragon as a symbol of your power PUJA deluca http://www.fewdiscuss.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#384052: grundfra

2007-11-20 Thread Lan pomnitz
You can experience multiple [EMAIL PROTECTED] addison Merkle http://heartoward.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[Bug tree-optimization/34123] [4.3 Regression] verify_ssa failed with -ftree-loop-linear

2007-11-20 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-20 10:59 --- The testcase is wrong, static unsigned char sbox[] = {}; means zero sized array. But using sbox[256] makes the testcase valid and the problem is still there. This looks like a bug in can_convert_to_perfect_nest, this l

Bug#452108: gcc-4.2: Incorrect results with abs()

2007-11-20 Thread Frans Pop
Package: gcc-4.2 Version: 4.2.2-3 Severity: important At least gcc-4.2 and gcc-4.1 but probably also earlier versions are affected by a bug discussed on the linux-kernel list [1]. The following test program will result in "OMG,-10==10 in linux!" when compiled with both gcc-4.1 and gcc-4.2. int m

Processed: Re: Bug#452081: makedb broken on alpha/sid

2007-11-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > clone 452081 -1 Bug#452081: makedb broken on alpha/sid Bug 452081 cloned as bug 452110. > reassign -1 gcc-4.2 Bug#452110: makedb broken on alpha/sid Bug reassigned from package `libc6.1' to `gcc-4.2'. > retitle -1 gcc-4.2 generates bad code on alpha B

Processed: Re: gcc-4.2: Incorrect results with abs()

2007-11-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 452108 + patch Bug#452108: gcc-4.2: Incorrect results with abs() There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > clone 452108 -1 -2 -3 Bug#452108: gcc-4.2: Incorrect results with abs() Bug 452108 cloned as bugs 452113-452115. > reassign -1 gcc-4.1 4.

Bug#452108: gcc-4.2: Incorrect results with abs()

2007-11-20 Thread Bastian Blank
On Tue, Nov 20, 2007 at 03:09:17PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote: > The following test program will result in "OMG,-10==10 in linux!" when > compiled with both gcc-4.1 and gcc-4.2. Further information: | int i = 2; | int a = -10 * abs (i - 1); | int b = 10 * abs (i - 1); compiles to (original tree) | in

Processed: tagging 452108

2007-11-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26 > tags 452108 + fixed-upstream Bug#452108: gcc-4.2: Incorrect results with abs() Tags were: patch Tags added: fixed-upstream > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact

Processed: bug 452108 is forwarded to http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34130

2007-11-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26 > forwarded 452108 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34130 Bug#452108: gcc-4.2: Incorrect results with abs() Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to http://gcc.gn

Bug#452108: gcc-4.2: Incorrect results with abs()

2007-11-20 Thread Frans Pop
tags 452108 + patch clone 452108 -1 -2 -3 reassign -1 gcc-4.1 4.1.2-17 reassign -2 gcc-3.3 1:3.3.6-15 reassign -3 gcc-3.4 3.4.6-6 thanks On Tuesday 20 November 2007, Frans Pop wrote: > The following test program will result in "OMG,-10==10 in linux!" when > compiled with both gcc-4.1 and gcc-4.2.

Processed: Re: gcc-4.2: Incorrect results with abs()

2007-11-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > found 452113 4.1.1-21 Bug#452113: gcc-4.2: Incorrect results with abs() Bug marked as found in version 4.1.1-21. > found 452114 3.3.5-13 Bug#452114: gcc-4.2: Incorrect results with abs() Bug marked as found in version 3.3.5-13. > found 452114 3.3.6-15

Processed: Re: gcc-4.2: Incorrect results with abs()

2007-11-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Use correct versions > notfound 452114 3.3.5-13 Bug#452114: gcc-4.2: Incorrect results with abs() Bug no longer marked as found in version 3.3.5-13. > notfound 452114 3.3.6-15 Bug#452114: gcc-4.2: Incorrect results with abs() Bug no longer marked as

Bug#452108: gcc-4.2: Incorrect results with abs()

2007-11-20 Thread Frans Pop
found 452113 4.1.1-21 found 452114 3.3.5-13 found 452114 3.3.6-15 found 452115 3.4.3-13sarge1 found 452115 3.4.6-5 thanks On Tuesday 20 November 2007, Frans Pop wrote: > Just tested that gcc-3.3 and gcc-3.4 are also affected. Sarge and Etch versions of 3.3, 3.4 and 4.1 are affected as well. gcc-2

Processing of gnat-4.2_4.2.2-3_hppa.changes

2007-11-20 Thread Archive Administrator
gnat-4.2_4.2.2-3_hppa.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: gnat-4.2-base_4.2.2-3_hppa.deb libgnatprj-dev_4.2.2-3_hppa.deb libgnatprj4.2_4.2.2-3_hppa.deb libgnatprj4.2-dbg_4.2.2-3_hppa.deb libgnat-4.2_4.2.2-3_hppa.deb libgnat-4.2-dbg_4.2.2-3_hppa.deb libgnat

gnat-4.2_4.2.2-3_hppa.changes REJECTED

2007-11-20 Thread Debian Installer
Rejected: gnat-4.2_4.2.2-3_hppa.changes: a file with this name already exists in the Done directory. Rejected: libgnat-4.2-dbg_4.2.2-3_hppa.deb: old version (4.2.2-3) in unstable >= new version (4.2.2-3) targeted at unstable. Rejected: libgnat-4.2-dbg_4.2.2-3_hppa.deb: can not overwrite existing

Bug#452108: what binary packages to update?

2007-11-20 Thread Török Edwin
> Note that this issue is in theory pretty serious as in principle _any_ > binary package in the archive could be affected. Since the abs() is optimized away on miscompilations, searching for binaries that have the abs() symbol won't find the buggy ones. The only reliable way to find out what pac