Bug#433636: gij-4.1 broken, gij-4.2 OK

Hi, Sorry for the delay. When I compile with gcj 4.1 and then run with gij-4.1, I get the error. If I run the same class file with gij-4.2, everything's OK. It looks like the issue is (or was) in the classpath libs, in java/util/Calendar.java. The gcj4.2-src source package has some extra stateme

gcc allows negatively sized arrays.

>Submitter-Id: net >Originator:Steven Young >Organization: n/a >Confidential: no >Synopsis: gcc allows negatively-sized arrays >Severity: non-critical >Priority: low >Category: c >Class: accepts-illegal >Release: gcc (GCC) 4.1.2 (Ubuntu 4.1.2-0ubuntu4) >Envi

Processed: [bts-link] source package gcc-4.2

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # > # bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcc-4.2 > # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html > # > user [EMAIL PROTECTED] Setting user to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (was [EMAIL PROTECTED]). > # remote status report f

Processed: [bts-link] source package gcc-4.0

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # > # bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcc-4.0 > # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html > # > user [EMAIL PROTECTED] Setting user to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (was [EMAIL PROTECTED]). > # remote status report f

Processed: [bts-link] source package gcj-4.1

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # > # bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcj-4.1 > # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html > # > user [EMAIL PROTECTED] Setting user to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (was [EMAIL PROTECTED]). > # remote status report f

Processed: [bts-link] source package gcc-4.1

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # > # bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcc-4.1 > # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html > # > user [EMAIL PROTECTED] Setting user to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (was [EMAIL PROTECTED]). > # remote status report f

[bts-link] source package gcc-4.2

# # bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcc-4.2 # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html # user [EMAIL PROTECTED] # remote status report for #431608 # * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR30052 # * remote status changed: (?) -> REOPENED forwarded 431608 http://gc

[bts-link] source package gcc-defaults

# # bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcc-defaults # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html # user [EMAIL PROTECTED] # remote status report for #395057 # * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR29609 # * remote status changed: (?) -> NEW usertags 395057 + status-N

[bts-link] source package gcc-4.0

# # bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcc-4.0 # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html # user [EMAIL PROTECTED] # remote status report for #342126 # * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR28318 # * remote status changed: (?) -> RESOLVED # * remote resolution cha

[bts-link] source package gcj-4.1

# # bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcj-4.1 # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html # user [EMAIL PROTECTED] # remote status report for #423160 # * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR32862 # * remote status changed: ASSIGNED -> RESOLVED # * remote resolutio

[bts-link] source package gcc-4.1

# # bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcc-4.1 # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html # user [EMAIL PROTECTED] # remote status report for #386174 # * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR19430 # * remote status changed: (?) -> NEW forwarded 386174 http://gcc.gnu

gcc-3.4 3.4.6ds1-6 MIGRATED to testing

FYI: The status of the gcc-3.4 source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 3.4.6ds1-5 Current version: 3.4.6ds1-6 -- This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible. See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information

Re: gcc allows negatively sized arrays.

On Wed, 08 Aug 2007 12:46:50 -0400, Steven Young wrote: >>Fix: > I don't know. comp.gcc.bugs indicates undefined C99 behavior doesn't need a fix. =) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: retitle gcj report

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 433636 [fixed in 4.2] java.util.Calendar.setTimeZone fails to set > ZONE_OFFSET Bug#433636: gcj-4.1: java.util.Calendar.setTimeZone fails to set ZONE_OFFSET Changed Bug title to `[fixed in 4.2] java.util.Calendar.setTimeZone fails to set ZONE_