gcc-4.1_4.1.2-5_multi.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
gobjc-4.1-multilib_4.1.2-5_powerpc.deb
lib64gfortran1_4.1.2-5_powerpc.deb
libgfortran1_4.1.2-5_i386.deb
lib64gfortran1_4.1.2-5_i386.deb
gcc-4.1_4.1.2-5_powerpc.deb
libffi4-dev_4.1.2-5_i386.deb
libff
Accepted:
cpp-4.1_4.1.2-5_hppa.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-4.1/cpp-4.1_4.1.2-5_hppa.deb
cpp-4.1_4.1.2-5_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-4.1/cpp-4.1_4.1.2-5_i386.deb
cpp-4.1_4.1.2-5_powerpc.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-4.1/cpp-4.1_4.1.2-5_powerpc.deb
fixincludes_4.1.2-5_hppa.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-4.1/fix
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the
override file for the following file(s):
gcc-4.1-base_4.1.2-5_hppa.deb: package says section is libs, override says
devel.
gcc-4.1-base_4.1.2-5_i386.deb: package says section is libs, override says
devel.
gcc-4.1-base_4.1.2-5_po
Your message dated Mon, 30 Apr 2007 07:17:13 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#421197: fixed in gcc-4.1 4.1.2-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Mon, 30 Apr 2007 07:17:13 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#421382: fixed in gcc-4.1 4.1.2-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Mon, 30 Apr 2007 07:17:13 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#421423: fixed in gcc-4.1 4.1.2-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Mon, 30 Apr 2007 07:17:13 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#421526: fixed in gcc-4.1 4.1.2-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Mon, 30 Apr 2007 07:17:13 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#421362: fixed in gcc-4.1 4.1.2-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
--- Comment #5 from charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-30 11:18 ---
No feedback in 6 months, closing.
--
charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
steven at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |steven at gcc dot gnu dot
|dot org
--- Comment #3 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-30 12:01 ---
There are at least 2 issues here:
1) We just lose the locus of the goto statements when we lower GIMPLE and when
we jump across forwarded blocks.
2) When we don't lose the locus in GIMPLE, we lose it in cfgexpand.
Oi, pessoal.
Tive a infelicidade de descobrir que alguem pegou minha senha restaurando a
seção do browser em um computador publico.
Nao sei quem foi, porem ja pesso desculpas por qualquer email ou bate papo
indevido ou ofecisso que pudera ter acontecido no mes que passou. ja alterei
a senha e acre
reopen 421362
thanks
>* gfortran-4.1: Depend on libgfortran1, provide the libgfortran.so
> symlink. Closes: #421362.
It seems the symlink is in
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.1/libgfortran.so, which it doesn't seem
to be using. It's should be 4.1.3 instead of 4.1?
I still get a failed
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 421362
Bug#421362: gfortran-4.1: libgfortran.so symlink missing
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
you may need to use 'found' to remove fixed versions.
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> thanks
Stoppin
--- Comment #18 from hjl at lucon dot org 2007-04-30 17:45 ---
An updated patch is posted at
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-04/msg02003.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31344
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for
Kurt Roeckx writes:
> reopen 421362
> thanks
>
> >* gfortran-4.1: Depend on libgfortran1, provide the libgfortran.so
> > symlink. Closes: #421362.
>
> It seems the symlink is in
> /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.1/libgfortran.so, which it doesn't seem
> to be using. It's should be 4.1.3
On Mon, Apr 30, 2007 at 05:45:07PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> reopen 421362
> thanks
>
> >* gfortran-4.1: Depend on libgfortran1, provide the libgfortran.so
> > symlink. Closes: #421362.
>
> It seems the symlink is in
> /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.1/libgfortran.so, which it doesn't
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> unblock 421518 by 408850
Bug#408850: conflicting stat prototypes on alpha
Bug#421518: FTBFS (alpha): conflicting types for 'stat'
Was blocked by: 408850
Blocking bugs of 421518 removed: 408850
> reassign 408850 gcc
Bug#408850: conflicting stat prototyp
The subscription of the email address:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To the mailing list:
Al-Manahel Newsletter List
is all set. Thanks for subscribing!
Date of this subscription: Wed Apr 25 06:23:29 2007
Please save this email message for future reference.
-
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcj-4.1
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
#
user [EMAIL PROTECTED]
# remote status report for #421098
# * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR28340
# * remote status changed: (?) -> RESOLVED
# * remote resolution cha
The removal of the email address:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>From the mailing list:
Al-Manahel Newsletter List
is all set.
Date of this removal: Mon Apr 23 06:23:10 2007
Please save this email message for future reference.
--
The removal of the email address:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>From the mailing list:
Al-Manahel Newsletter List
is all set.
Date of this removal: Thu Apr 26 04:03:39 2007
Please save this email message for future reference.
--
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcc-snapshot
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
#
user [EMAIL PROTECTED]
# remote status report for #367856
# * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR30700
# * remote status changed: NEW -> RESOLVED
# * remote resolutio
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcc-4.1
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
#
user [EMAIL PROTECTED]
# remote status report for #391657
# * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR27891
# * remote status changed: NEW -> RESOLVED
# * remote resolution cha
Package: java-gcj-compat
Version: 1.0.65-10
Severity: normal
Hi,
I don't know exactly if it is a bug, but I noticed that :
/usr/lib/jvm/java-1.4.2-gcj-4.1-1.4.2.0/jre/lib/i386/client/libjvm.so
/usr/lib/jvm/java-1.4.2-gcj-4.1-1.4.2.0/jre/lib/i386/libjawt.so
/usr/lib/jvm/java-1.4.2-gcj-4.1-1.4.2.0/
LAST_UPDATED: Sun Apr 29 20:44:29 UTC 2007 (revision 124285)
Native configuration is alpha-unknown-linux-gnu
=== libffi tests ===
Running target unix
=== libffi Summary ===
# of expected passes1084
# of unsupported tests 8
=
LAST_UPDATED: Sun Apr 29 20:44:29 UTC 2007 (revision 124285)
Native configuration is x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
=== g++ tests ===
Running target unix
XPASS: g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr14814.C scan-tree-dump-times &this 0
XPASS: g++.old-deja/g++.other/init5.C execution test
===
LAST_UPDATED: Sun Apr 29 20:44:29 UTC 2007 (revision 124285)
Native configuration is i486-pc-linux-gnu
=== g++ tests ===
Running target unix
XPASS: g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr14814.C scan-tree-dump-times &this 0
XPASS: g++.old-deja/g++.other/init5.C execution test
=== g+
LAST_UPDATED: Sun Apr 29 20:44:29 UTC 2007 (revision 124285)
Native configuration is mips-unknown-linux-gnu
=== g++ tests ===
Running target unix
XPASS: g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr14814.C scan-tree-dump-times &this 0
XPASS: g++.old-deja/g++.other/init5.C execution test
=
LAST_UPDATED: Sun Apr 29 20:44:29 UTC 2007 (revision 124285)
Native configuration is ia64-unknown-linux-gnu
=== g++ tests ===
Running target unix
XPASS: g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr14814.C scan-tree-dump-times &this 0
XPASS: g++.old-deja/g++.other/init5.C execution test
=
LAST_UPDATED: Sun Apr 29 20:44:29 UTC 2007 (revision 124285)
Native configuration is mipsel-unknown-linux-gnu
=== g++ tests ===
Running target unix
XPASS: g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr14814.C scan-tree-dump-times &this 0
XPASS: g++.old-deja/g++.other/init5.C execution test
LAST_UPDATED: Sun Apr 29 20:44:29 UTC 2007 (revision 124285)
Native configuration is powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu
=== g++ tests ===
Running target unix
XPASS: g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr14814.C scan-tree-dump-times &this 0
=== g++ Summary for unix ===
# of expected passes
LAST_UPDATED: Sun Apr 29 20:44:29 UTC 2007 (revision 124285)
Native configuration is s390-ibm-linux-gnu
=== g++ tests ===
Running target unix
XPASS: g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr14814.C scan-tree-dump-times &this 0
XPASS: g++.old-deja/g++.other/init5.C execution test
=== g
33 matches
Mail list logo
