* Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-04-21 20:18]:
> The underlying problem appears to be
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19495
The good news is that this is gone in 4.3 and might get fixed, at
least work-arouned, for 4.2:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31638#c3
--- Comment #4 from tbm at cyrius dot com 2007-04-22 11:13 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> In fact, the problem cannot be reproduced on ia64, with current mainline.
I tried revision 123217, just a few revisions before C++/30500. Glad to
hear it's no longer there.
--
http://gcc.gnu.
* Alex Romosan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-04-19 21:34]:
> remove -gstab+ or change -O2 to -O0 and the file compiles just fine.
I forgot -fPIC. I can see this error now, thanks.
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscri
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> forwarded 396745 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR30472
Bug#396745: regression on amd64 with optimazation enabled
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to http://gcc.gnu.org/PR30472.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assi
* Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-04-22 19:25]:
> I believe this is the same as PR30472.
Actually, I notice that I filed PR29443, which I believe is the same
too.
Also, there are good news: it works with gcc 4.2.
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email t
forwarded 396745 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR30472
thanks
* Alex Romosan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-04-19 21:34]:
> remove -gstab+ or change -O2 to -O0 and the file compiles just fine.
I believe this is the same as PR30472. The response to that bug is "I
don't know why anyone would want to use stabs deb
* Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-04-22 19:29]:
> Also, there are good news: it works with gcc 4.2.
Actually, it's a little bit more complicated. Your code compiles with
4.2 while my testcase doesn't. This also applies from the testcase
for PR30472.
In any case, this is a known bug.
--
tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||debian-gcc at lists dot
||d
--- Comment #4 from tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-22 18:27 ---
isn't this a duplicate of 29443?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30472
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
--
T
--- Comment #5 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-22 18:29 ---
Indeed.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 29443 ***
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
יבואן /יצואן
רוצה לחסוך בעלויות שילוח מטענים עמילות והובלה?
פרילנסר ותיק בענף יועץ ומטפל מול הרשויות
איתור ספקים מוצרים וטכנולוגיה בעולם
לפרטים
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
050-2033366
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: gcc-3.4
Version: 3.4.6-5
Severity: normal
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~>man gcc-3.4|cat
GCC(1)GNU GCC(1)
gcc-3.4.6 2007-01-01GCC(1)
I think this should be removed.
-- System Infor
gcc-snapshot_20070422-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
gcc-snapshot_20070422-1.dsc
gcc-snapshot_20070422.orig.tar.gz
gcc-snapshot_20070422-1.diff.gz
gcc-snapshot_20070422-1_amd64.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
--- Comment #5 from mark at codesourcery dot com 2007-04-23 02:19 ---
Subject: Re: [4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] string usage leads
to warning with -Wcast-align
pcarlini at suse dot de wrote:
> --- Comment #3 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2007-04-22 01:19 ---
> In fact, the problem
Accepted:
gcc-snapshot_20070422-1.diff.gz
to pool/main/g/gcc-snapshot/gcc-snapshot_20070422-1.diff.gz
gcc-snapshot_20070422-1.dsc
to pool/main/g/gcc-snapshot/gcc-snapshot_20070422-1.dsc
gcc-snapshot_20070422-1_amd64.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-snapshot/gcc-snapshot_20070422-1_amd64.deb
gcc-snapsh
Your message dated Mon, 23 Apr 2007 01:32:08 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#416370: fixed in gcc-snapshot 20070422-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the c
Your message dated Mon, 23 Apr 2007 01:32:08 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#395162: fixed in gcc-snapshot 20070422-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the c
Your message dated Mon, 23 Apr 2007 01:32:08 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#416312: fixed in gcc-snapshot 20070422-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the c
Your message dated Mon, 23 Apr 2007 01:32:08 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#416629: fixed in gcc-snapshot 20070422-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the c
19 matches
Mail list logo
