Re: gcc-4.1: debian/patches/gcc-long-double.dpatch fails to apply

2006-12-20 Thread Ludovic Brenta
Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > sorry, I did check in changes on the sid branch, which are not target > for etch. If we do want to make modifications for the etch target, we > should work on branches/etch instead. Well since Etch is frozen, the only thing that would justify an Etch br

Re: Please allow gcc-doc-defaults 4.1.1.nf3 into etch

2006-12-20 Thread Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt
"Nikita V. Youshchenko" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Please allow gcc-doc-defaults 4.1.1.nf3 into etch. > This upload fixes RC bug (#403328); the only change from previous version > is addition of missing Conflicts: entry. Unblocked. Marc -- Fachbegriffe der Informatik - Einfach erklärt 213: N

Re: gcc-4.1: debian/patches/gcc-long-double.dpatch fails to apply

2006-12-20 Thread Matthias Klose
Ludovic Brenta writes: > Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > sorry, I did check in changes on the sid branch, which are not target > > for etch. If we do want to make modifications for the etch target, we > > should work on branches/etch instead. > > Well since Etch is frozen, the only

Re: gcc-4.1: debian/patches/gcc-long-double.dpatch fails to apply

2006-12-20 Thread Ludovic Brenta
Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > prepared for sid unfreezing again after etch is released. the first > thing to do is to update glibc and then binutils and gcc. You can find > both versions needed in experimental. > >> I propose to revert the offending changes in the sid branch; if you