> On Sat, Dec 16, 2006 at 03:37:48PM +0300, Nikita V. Youshchenko wrote:
> > > - If you have a package that needs updating, *please* don't forget
> > > to contact us. *Don't expect us to find out about it on our own*.
> >
> > Please allow gcc-doc-defaults 4.1.1.nf3 into etch.
> > This upload fi
I wrote:
Having looked a little deeper, it appears it *does* use dh_strip after
all. The file to examine is debian/rules.d/binary-ada.mk.
I'll try modifying that file to add --keep-debug to the dh_strip
commands to see if that does anything useful...
And indeed it does. Very nicely, actua
Hi Kevin,
Thanks for taking all that trouble. The debugging information should
not go into the package libgnat-4.1, because that's a run-time-only
package not intended for developers.
Instead, the debugging information should go either to a new package
(libgnat-4.1-dbg), either into package gnat
gcc-4.2_4.2-20061217-1_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
gcc-4.2_4.2-20061217-1.dsc
gcc-4.2_4.2-20061217.orig.tar.gz
gcc-4.2_4.2-20061217-1.diff.gz
gcc-4.2-source_4.2-20061217-1_all.deb
cpp-4.2-doc_4.2-20061217-1_all.deb
libgcj8-jar_4.2-20061217-1_all
gcc-snapshot_20061217-1_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
gcc-snapshot_20061217-1.dsc
gcc-snapshot_20061217.orig.tar.gz
gcc-snapshot_20061217-1.diff.gz
gcc-snapshot_20061217-1_i386.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, em
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-18 20:16 ---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 323 ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #85 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-18 20:16
---
*** Bug 30255 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
Ludovic Brenta wrote:
> Hi Kevin,
>
> Thanks for taking all that trouble. The debugging information should
> not go into the package libgnat-4.1, because that's a run-time-only
> package not intended for developers.
That may be true, but developers aren't the only ones who might make
use of thes
Accepted:
gcc-snapshot_20061217-1.diff.gz
to pool/main/g/gcc-snapshot/gcc-snapshot_20061217-1.diff.gz
gcc-snapshot_20061217-1.dsc
to pool/main/g/gcc-snapshot/gcc-snapshot_20061217-1.dsc
gcc-snapshot_20061217-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-snapshot/gcc-snapshot_20061217-1_i386.deb
gcc-snapshot
cpp-4.2-doc_4.2-20061217-1_all.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-4.2/cpp-4.2-doc_4.2-20061217-1_all.deb
cpp-4.2_4.2-20061217-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-4.2/cpp-4.2_4.2-20061217-1_i386.deb
fixincludes_4.2-20061217-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-4.2/fixincludes_4.2-20061217-1_i386.deb
(new) g++-4.2-mult
--- Comment #2 from whaley at cs dot utsa dot edu 2006-12-18 20:43 ---
Hi,
While it may be decided not to fix this problem, this is not a duplicate of bug
323, and so it should be closed for another reason if you want to ignore it.
323 has a problem because of the function call, where
--- Comment #3 from whaley at cs dot utsa dot edu 2006-12-18 21:16 ---
BTW, in case it isn't obvious, here's the fix that I typically use for problems
like bug 323 that I cannot when it is gcc itself that is unpredictably spilling
the computation:
void test(double x, double y)
{
const
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-18 22:04 ---
The problem with register spilling and what PR 323 is talking about is all the
same issue really, it is just exposed differently.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 323 ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu
--- Comment #86 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-18 22:04
---
*** Bug 30255 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=323
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are
--- Comment #5 from whaley at cs dot utsa dot edu 2006-12-18 22:14 ---
I cannot, of course, force you to admit it, but 323 is a bug fixable by the
programmer, and this one is not. The other requires a lot of work in the
compiler, and this does not. So, viewing them as the same can be d
Kevin Brown writes:
> That may be true, but developers aren't the only ones who might make
> use of these files. Anyone who gets a crash in an Ada application
> could get a much better traceback (for filing a bug report) with
> these files in place than without.
>
> Independent of the potential i
--- Comment #6 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-18 23:02 ---
>I cannot, of course, force you to admit it, but 323 is a bug fixable by the
> programmer, and this one is not.
Depends on what you mean by fixable by the programmer because most people don't
know anything about pr
Ludovic Brenta writes:
> Kevin Brown writes:
> > That may be true, but developers aren't the only ones who might make
> > use of these files. Anyone who gets a crash in an Ada application
> > could get a much better traceback (for filing a bug report) with
> > these files in place than without.
>
Ludovic Brenta wrote:
> Kevin Brown writes:
> > That may be true, but developers aren't the only ones who might make
> > use of these files. Anyone who gets a crash in an Ada application
> > could get a much better traceback (for filing a bug report) with
> > these files in place than without.
> >
That version of binutils is nowhere to be found in Debian: not in
testing, not in unstable and not in experimental. So I'm wondering
why it is necessary to build-depend on it, and whether or not I should
revert that particular change (see revision 1669).
I'm already building with BINUTILSV set to
--- Comment #7 from whaley at cs dot utsa dot edu 2006-12-19 00:31 ---
>Depends on what you mean by fixable by the programmer because most people don't
know anything about precusion issues.
Most people don't know programming at all, so I guess you are suggesting that
errors that are f
After purging the package libpthread-dev the above code doesn't make g++ yield
that error message. The program actually works like it's supposed to after
being compiled.
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection a
22 matches
Mail list logo
